Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Gun myths debunked NRA will hate this
Page <<first <prev 14 of 15 next>
Feb 3, 2013 20:50:05   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
donrent wrote:
I don't know where in the hell you got that information "cause it is nothing more THAN Democrate written BULL SHIT !!!


I was going to say the same thing but I was going to use Bulls**t to be gentle. I like yours better. I've seldom seen such a disgusting list of anti-gun fiction except I won't say it's Democrat written because not all Democrats are anti-gun. I'd prefer to say panty-waist, pacifist, cowards who fear their own shadows and are afraid to even use one finger to touch the grip of a BB gun wrote it.

6X times more than what or when? 10X more than what or when? Women carrying guns are more likely shot by someone known than someone not known? Of course... Because the person is trusted to not be homicidal - but notice that they are not killed by strangers easily - thus carrying concealed works. "Legal" guns bought from private owners without a background check? How's that called legal?

Skewed "facts" distributed to enhance anti-gun U.N. rhetoric. Skewed "facts" distributed by anti-gun pediatric medical people.

Come on... if this was a tongue-in-cheek joke skit on Comedy Channel it might be funny but this is an insult to the intelligence of anybody with logic and an IQ above 70.

Reply
Feb 4, 2013 10:17:16   #
pounder35 Loc: "Southeast of Disorder"
 
Whew!!!! OK Marco calm down. You are dead on the mark though. :lol: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 4, 2013 16:29:59   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
papayanirvana wrote:
seriously, the 2nd amendment guys never mention this part of the amendment, but I think you meant well-regulated militia.

And boo on our founding fathers. While I appreciate brevity,

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

it sounds more like a haiku, than a constitutional amendment.


There are as many opinions regarding the second amendment as there are gun deaths per year. Many believe the amendment was to allow for the formation of an organized armed forces Constitutionally thereby preventing any law being passed that would dissolve the army and or navy. I really don't care what happens with the gun laws and their enforcement as I have stated before if they want my gun they can have it...I expect to be compensated in either tax credits or cash if they take it though. Those that live in fear of some overlord coming to take their guns are suffering from a psychosis and need treatment. Those are really the ones we need worry about.

Reply
 
 
Feb 4, 2013 17:03:41   #
RustyEire
 
RixPix wrote:
. . . . if they want my gun they can have it...I expect to be compensated in either tax credits or cash if they take it though. Those that live in fear of some overlord coming to take their guns are suffering from a psychosis and need treatment. Those are really the ones we need worry about.


Fear not, RixpIx! The same folks who gave the Let's-Keep-Guns-in-the-House-So-We-Can-Shoot-Down-the-F-16s-and-B-1s-the-Feds-Send-to-Bomb-Us-into-a-Tyrannized-State crowd the 2nd amendment also gave us the 5th Amendment! It's better known for your right not to testify against yourself . . . but the last few clauses also ensure your right not to be deprived of your property without due process of law (and, if those confiscated weapons were later to be used by the Feds to be distributed amongst its standing army actively engaged in that tyrannical suppression of the lunatic fringe previously alluded to, thus a "public" use of said confiscated guns, the same amendment guarantees you "just compensation." So. No worries, Rix Pix. All's well in Looneyville.
As for the psychosis you mention, prevalent among that same lunatic fringe "prepping" for the coming Federal Tyranny---we have a fine example of the condition unfolding before our very eyes in Alabama, starring the Anti-Federal Survivalist Nutjob holding a 5-year-old hostage against said Tyranny. Live Free or Die, Brother!

Reply
Feb 4, 2013 17:05:04   #
pounder35 Loc: "Southeast of Disorder"
 
RixPix wrote:
papayanirvana wrote:
seriously, the 2nd amendment guys never mention this part of the amendment, but I think you meant well-regulated militia.

And boo on our founding fathers. While I appreciate brevity,

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

it sounds more like a haiku, than a constitutional amendment.


There are as many opinions regarding the second amendment as there are gun deaths per year. Many believe the amendment was to allow for the formation of an organized armed forces Constitutionally thereby preventing any law being passed that would dissolve the army and or navy. I really don't care what happens with the gun laws and their enforcement as I have stated before if they want my gun they can have it...I expect to be compensated in either tax credits or cash if they take it though. Those that live in fear of some overlord coming to take their guns are suffering from a psychosis and need treatment. Those are really the ones we need worry about.
quote=papayanirvana seriously, the 2nd amendment ... (show quote)


If you get compensated will you pay for my mental treatments? :roll: :lol: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 4, 2013 17:08:08   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
From your post, it sounds like you are the one in need of Mental Health care...

RustyEire wrote:
RixPix wrote:
. . . . if they want my gun they can have it...I expect to be compensated in either tax credits or cash if they take it though. Those that live in fear of some overlord coming to take their guns are suffering from a psychosis and need treatment. Those are really the ones we need worry about.


Fear not, RixpIx! The same folks who gave the Let's-Keep-Guns-in-the-House-So-We-Can-Shoot-Down-the-F-16s-and-B-1s-the-Feds-Send-to-Bomb-Us-into-a-Tyrannized-State crowd the 2nd amendment also gave us the 5th Amendment! It's better known for your right not to testify against yourself . . . but the last few clauses also ensure your right not to be deprived of your property without due process of law (and, if those confiscated weapons were later to be used by the Feds to be distributed amongst its standing army actively engaged in that tyrannical suppression of the lunatic fringe previously alluded to, thus a "public" use of said confiscated guns, the same amendment guarantees you "just compensation." So. No worries, Rix Pix. All's well in Looneyville.
As for the psychosis you mention, prevalent among that same lunatic fringe "prepping" for the coming Federal Tyranny---we have a fine example of the condition unfolding before our very eyes in Alabama, starring the Anti-Federal Survivalist Nutjob holding a 5-year-old hostage against said Tyranny. Live Free or Die, Brother!
quote=RixPix . . . . if they want my gun they can... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 4, 2013 17:11:57   #
pounder35 Loc: "Southeast of Disorder"
 
RustyEire wrote:
RixPix wrote:
. . . . if they want my gun they can have it...I expect to be compensated in either tax credits or cash if they take it though. Those that live in fear of some overlord coming to take their guns are suffering from a psychosis and need treatment. Those are really the ones we need worry about.


Fear not, RixpIx! The same folks who gave the Let's-Keep-Guns-in-the-House-So-We-Can-Shoot-Down-the-F-16s-and-B-1s-the-Feds-Send-to-Bomb-Us-into-a-Tyrannized-State crowd the 2nd amendment also gave us the 5th Amendment! It's better known for your right not to testify against yourself . . . but the last few clauses also ensure your right not to be deprived of your property without due process of law (and, if those confiscated weapons were later to be used by the Feds to be distributed amongst its standing army actively engaged in that tyrannical suppression of the lunatic fringe previously alluded to, thus a "public" use of said confiscated guns, the same amendment guarantees you "just compensation." So. No worries, Rix Pix. All's well in Looneyville.
As for the psychosis you mention, prevalent among that same lunatic fringe "prepping" for the coming Federal Tyranny---we have a fine example of the condition unfolding before our very eyes in Alabama, starring the Anti-Federal Survivalist Nutjob holding a 5-year-old hostage against said Tyranny. Live Free or Die, Brother!
quote=RixPix . . . . if they want my gun they can... (show quote)


It's apparently over. The kid is alive but probably mentally scarred for life. The perp has had a mental problem for a long time as testified by neighbors. Whether or not it had something to do with his service to our country in Vietnam will never be known. My Dad served in Vietnam and saw some pretty bad stuff in air rescue but he never "lost it."

Reply
 
 
Feb 4, 2013 19:20:09   #
Marc-Wi Loc: Oshkosh Wi
 
Rusty Eire,you have made several posts on this thread. None of them make any sense. Could you please sit down, collect your thoughts and write them out in clear, concise properly constructed sentences. This will help me ( and the rest of us ) understand your position. The unorganized thoughts you are spewing out are gobbily gook.
Thank you.

Reply
Feb 4, 2013 19:46:57   #
RustyEire
 
Marc-Wi wrote:
Rusty Eire,you have made several posts on this thread. None of them make any sense. Could you please sit down, collect your thoughts and write them out in clear, concise properly constructed sentences. This will help me ( and the rest of us ) understand your position. The unorganized thoughts you are spewing out are gobbily gook.
Thank you.


I'm not trying to be abstruse, Marc. In fact, I thought my posts were pretty clear. If you tell me what it is that's confusing you, I'll try to clarify. My sentences were properly constructed & unambiguous. And I think the phrase is "gobbledy gook" . . . .

Reply
Feb 4, 2013 20:36:40   #
Marc-Wi Loc: Oshkosh Wi
 
Well,your second sentence is a bit messed up. what's guns in houses,shooting down F16s and B1s and feds bombing got to do with anything? And the folks who gave us the 2nd and 5th amendments are involved in that? I'm at a loss there. The founding fathers listed the first ten amendments as being given by our creator,to be protected by the gov't, not abused. And why would the Fed use confiscated semi automatic weapons when they allready have fully automatic ones?
What is this lunatic fringe and Loonyville talk? I see no lunatic fringe. I see a lot of good people grounded in the constitution worried about loosing those rights and liberties. I don't think that is at all loony.
And what does a nut job in Alabama have to do with any thing? They are all over the place, kidnapping kids, killing their own kids. We used to put these people away until the liberals decided it was a civil rights voilatoin and let them out on the streets.
And you are right it is gobbledy gook.

Reply
Feb 5, 2013 11:12:09   #
rrforster12 Loc: Leesburg Florida
 
What is all the smoke and heat about the citizens having weapons about anyway? There are far more people getting maimed and killed by our automobiles each year and its just chalked up to "the cost of living our lives". Why not use the same logic with the very infrequent instances of mayhem where guns are the instrument used. Mentally disturbed people are the cause of that mayhem virtually every time, but we spend enormous amounts of time and emotion focusing on the instrument of mayhem instead of the cause of it. Get the crazies out of our population and that will serve to reduce the instances of mass murder far more then trying to implement the virtually impossible task of trying to control 300 million guns that are already in the public's hands. That idea is really tilting at windmills! Thats my 2 cents worth.

Reply
 
 
Feb 5, 2013 14:34:34   #
billj316 Loc: Bedford, VA
 
From another old Sarge! Instead of finding fault with Organizations that are made up of individual citizens who are exercising their rights under the second amendment. Why not investigate the reasoning behind this big push to strip the Constitution of its true purpose, to protect the rights of the citizens of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Something I spent 20 some odd years of my life doing, plus ten more representing a good face to people outside the U.S. I personally believe in the Constitution of the United States and the Bill Of Rights and don't have much patience for people who want to destroy 236 years of success. WHAT SAY YOU?
bill

ole sarg wrote:
10 Pro-Gun Myths, Shot Down
Fact-checking some of the gun lobby's favorite arguments shows they're full of holes.
—By Dave Gilson | Thu Jan. 31, 2013 3:01 AM PST
192

By cutting off federal funding for research and stymieing data collection and sharing, the National Rifle Association has tried to do to the study of gun violence what climate deniers have done to the science of global warming. No wonder: When it comes to hard numbers, some of the gun lobby's favorite arguments are full of holes.

Myth #1: They're coming for your guns.
Fact-check: No one knows the exact number of guns in America, but it's clear there's no practical way to round them all up (never mind that no one in Washington is proposing this). Yet if you fantasize about rifle-toting citizens facing down the government, you'll rest easy knowing that America's roughly 80 million gun owners already have the feds and cops outgunned by a factor of around 79 to 1.


Sources: Congressional Research Service (PDF), Small Arms Survey

Myth #2: Guns don't kill people—people kill people.
Fact-check: People with more guns tend to kill more people—with guns. The states with the highest gun ownership rates have a gun murder rate 114% higher than those with the lowest gun ownership rates. Also, gun death rates tend to be higher in states with higher rates of gun ownership.


Sources: Pediatrics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Myth #3: An armed society is a polite society.
Fact-check: Drivers who carry guns are 44% more likely than unarmed drivers to make obscene gestures at other motorists, and 77% more likely to follow them aggressively.
• Among Texans convicted of serious crimes, those with concealed-handgun licenses were sentenced for threatening someone with a firearm 4.8 times more than those without.
• In states with Stand Your Ground and other laws making it easier to shoot in self-defense, those policies have been linked to a 7 to 10% increase in homicides.

Also see our yearlong investigation of gun laws and mass shootings: America Under the Gun.
Myth #4: More good guys with guns can stop rampaging bad guys.
Fact-check: Mass shootings stopped by armed civilians in the past 30 years: 0
• Chances that a shooting at an ER involves guns taken from guards: 1 in 5

Myth #5: Keeping a gun at home makes you safer.
Fact-check: Owning a gun has been linked to higher risks of homicide, suicide, and accidental death by gun.
• For every time a gun is used in self-defense in the home, there are 7 assaults or murders, 11 suicide attempts, and 4 accidents involving guns in or around a home.
• 43% of homes with guns and kids have at least one unlocked firearm.
• In one experiment, one third of 8-to-12-year-old boys who found a handgun pulled the trigger.


Advertise on MotherJones.com

Myth #6: Carrying a gun for self-defense makes you safer.
Fact-check: In 2011, nearly 10 times more people were shot and killed in arguments than by civilians trying to stop a crime.
• In one survey, nearly 1% of Americans reported using guns to defend themselves or their property. However, a closer look at their claims found that more than 50% involved using guns in an aggressive manner, such as escalating an argument.
• A Philadelphia study found that the odds of an assault victim being shot were 4.5 times greater if he carried a gun. His odds of being killed were 4.2 times greater.

Myth #7: Guns make women safer.
Fact-check: In 2010, nearly 6 times more women were shot by husbands, boyfriends, and ex-partners than murdered by male strangers.
• A woman's chances of being killed by her abuser increase more than 7 times if he has access to a gun.
• One study found that women in states with higher gun ownership rates were 4.9 times more likely to be murdered by a gun that women in states with lower gun ownership rates.

Myth #8: "Vicious, violent video games" deserve more blame than guns.
Fact-check: So said NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre after Newtown. So what's up with Japan?

United States Japan
Per capita spending
on video games $44 $55
Civilian firearms
per 100 people 88 0.6
Gun homicides
in 2008 11,030 11
Sources: PricewaterhouseCoopers, Small Arms Survey (PDF), UN Office on Drugs and Crime

Myth #9: More and more Americans are becoming gun owners.
Fact-check: More guns are being sold, but they're owned by a shrinking portion of the population.
• About 50% of Americans said they had a gun in their homes in 1973. Today, about 45% say they do. Overall, 35% of Americans personally own a gun.
• Around 80% of gun owners are men. On average they own 7.9 guns each.

Myth #10: We don't need more gun laws—we just need to enforce the ones we have.
Fact-check: Weak laws and loopholes backed by the gun lobby make it easier to get guns illegally.
• Around 40% of all legal gun sales involve private sellers and don't require background checks. 40% of prison inmates who used guns in their crimes got them this way.
• An investigation found 62% of online gun sellers were willing to sell to buyers who said they couldn't pass a background check.
• 20% of licensed California gun dealers agreed to sell handguns to researchers posing as illegal "straw" buyers.
• The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has not had a permanent director for 6 years, due to an NRA-backed requirement that the Senate approve nominees.

Icons in gun ownership chart: Handgun designed by Simon Child, rifle designed by Nadav Barkan, shotgun designed by Ammar Ceker, all from the Noun Project
10 Pro-Gun Myths, Shot Down br Fact-checking some ... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 5, 2013 16:07:50   #
Croce Loc: Earth
 
To Billj316 ... Bill, wise up you are wasting your time trying to make sense to Old Sarge, a troll who variously professes to be a guy with a 43 year military career (I think 6 active but not sure but that is close) a history professor (revisionist of course) at a 3rd rate college in the backwoods somewhere, a book publisher, and, get this, a pistol packer but only because he is a "potential target" (he does not tell us why or who might be "targeting him"). He hates, and I mean hates, yes really, really hates, all who are not screaming liberals. And he often treats them very nasty on this forum calling them stupid, racist, ill informed, haters of Obama only because he is black (he is a prolific race card hurler) etc etc. I have relished in answering his nasties with nasties and he does not acknowledge them. All in all a nasty burned out vile old creep troll.

Reply
Feb 5, 2013 18:09:17   #
pounder35 Loc: "Southeast of Disorder"
 
Croce wrote:
To Billj316 ... Bill, wise up you are wasting your time trying to make sense to Old Sarge, a troll who variously professes to be a guy with a 43 year military career (I think 6 active but not sure but that is close) a history professor (revisionist of course) at a 3rd rate college in the backwoods somewhere, a book publisher, and, get this, a pistol packer but only because he is a "potential target" (he does not tell us why or who might be "targeting him"). He hates, and I mean hates, yes really, really hates, all who are not screaming liberals. And he often treats them very nasty on this forum calling them stupid, racist, ill informed, haters of Obama only because he is black (he is a prolific race card hurler) etc etc. I have relished in answering his nasties with nasties and he does not acknowledge them. All in all a nasty burned out vile old creep troll.
To Billj316 ... Bill, wise up you are wasting your... (show quote)


Damn Croce! Why sugar coat it? Tell us how you really feel. :lol: I agree with what you posted about ole sarge. I have no idea about his background (race, military service, whatever. And don't care.) but I know we don't see eye to eye. For that I'm thankful. Must be strange to live in that fantasy land of his. :lol: :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 20, 2013 21:09:26   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
ole sarg wrote:
10 Pro-Gun Myths, Shot Down
Fact-checking some of the gun lobby's favorite arguments shows they're full of holes.
—By Dave Gilson | Thu Jan. 31, 2013 3:01 AM PST
192

By cutting off federal funding for research and stymieing data collection and sharing, the National Rifle Association has tried to do to the study of gun violence what climate deniers have done to the science of global warming. No wonder: When it comes to hard numbers, some of the gun lobby's favorite arguments are full of holes.

Myth #1: They're coming for your guns.
Fact-check: No one knows the exact number of guns in America, but it's clear there's no practical way to round them all up (never mind that no one in Washington is proposing this). Yet if you fantasize about rifle-toting citizens facing down the government, you'll rest easy knowing that America's roughly 80 million gun owners already have the feds and cops outgunned by a factor of around 79 to 1.


Sources: Congressional Research Service (PDF), Small Arms Survey

Myth #2: Guns don't kill people—people kill people.
Fact-check: People with more guns tend to kill more people—with guns. The states with the highest gun ownership rates have a gun murder rate 114% higher than those with the lowest gun ownership rates. Also, gun death rates tend to be higher in states with higher rates of gun ownership.


Sources: Pediatrics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Myth #3: An armed society is a polite society.
Fact-check: Drivers who carry guns are 44% more likely than unarmed drivers to make obscene gestures at other motorists, and 77% more likely to follow them aggressively.
• Among Texans convicted of serious crimes, those with concealed-handgun licenses were sentenced for threatening someone with a firearm 4.8 times more than those without.
• In states with Stand Your Ground and other laws making it easier to shoot in self-defense, those policies have been linked to a 7 to 10% increase in homicides.

Also see our yearlong investigation of gun laws and mass shootings: America Under the Gun.
Myth #4: More good guys with guns can stop rampaging bad guys.
Fact-check: Mass shootings stopped by armed civilians in the past 30 years: 0
• Chances that a shooting at an ER involves guns taken from guards: 1 in 5

Myth #5: Keeping a gun at home makes you safer.
Fact-check: Owning a gun has been linked to higher risks of homicide, suicide, and accidental death by gun.
• For every time a gun is used in self-defense in the home, there are 7 assaults or murders, 11 suicide attempts, and 4 accidents involving guns in or around a home.
• 43% of homes with guns and kids have at least one unlocked firearm.
• In one experiment, one third of 8-to-12-year-old boys who found a handgun pulled the trigger.


Advertise on MotherJones.com

Myth #6: Carrying a gun for self-defense makes you safer.
Fact-check: In 2011, nearly 10 times more people were shot and killed in arguments than by civilians trying to stop a crime.
• In one survey, nearly 1% of Americans reported using guns to defend themselves or their property. However, a closer look at their claims found that more than 50% involved using guns in an aggressive manner, such as escalating an argument.
• A Philadelphia study found that the odds of an assault victim being shot were 4.5 times greater if he carried a gun. His odds of being killed were 4.2 times greater.

Myth #7: Guns make women safer.
Fact-check: In 2010, nearly 6 times more women were shot by husbands, boyfriends, and ex-partners than murdered by male strangers.
• A woman's chances of being killed by her abuser increase more than 7 times if he has access to a gun.
• One study found that women in states with higher gun ownership rates were 4.9 times more likely to be murdered by a gun that women in states with lower gun ownership rates.

Myth #8: "Vicious, violent video games" deserve more blame than guns.
Fact-check: So said NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre after Newtown. So what's up with Japan?

United States Japan
Per capita spending
on video games $44 $55
Civilian firearms
per 100 people 88 0.6
Gun homicides
in 2008 11,030 11
Sources: PricewaterhouseCoopers, Small Arms Survey (PDF), UN Office on Drugs and Crime

Myth #9: More and more Americans are becoming gun owners.
Fact-check: More guns are being sold, but they're owned by a shrinking portion of the population.
• About 50% of Americans said they had a gun in their homes in 1973. Today, about 45% say they do. Overall, 35% of Americans personally own a gun.
• Around 80% of gun owners are men. On average they own 7.9 guns each.

Myth #10: We don't need more gun laws—we just need to enforce the ones we have.
Fact-check: Weak laws and loopholes backed by the gun lobby make it easier to get guns illegally.
• Around 40% of all legal gun sales involve private sellers and don't require background checks. 40% of prison inmates who used guns in their crimes got them this way.
• An investigation found 62% of online gun sellers were willing to sell to buyers who said they couldn't pass a background check.
• 20% of licensed California gun dealers agreed to sell handguns to researchers posing as illegal "straw" buyers.
• The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has not had a permanent director for 6 years, due to an NRA-backed requirement that the Senate approve nominees.

Icons in gun ownership chart: Handgun designed by Simon Child, rifle designed by Nadav Barkan, shotgun designed by Ammar Ceker, all from the Noun Project
10 Pro-Gun Myths, Shot Down br Fact-checking some ... (show quote)


"Post Ignored Due To Source"

Reply
Page <<first <prev 14 of 15 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.