Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
More on Biden's Student Loan Plan
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Apr 26, 2024 13:12:00   #
FrumCA
 
Biden's New Student Loan Forgiveness Plan Costs Taxpayers $559B and Benefits 6-Figure Income Households More Than Anyone
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/personalfinance/biden-s-new-student-loan-forgiveness-plan-costs-taxpayers-559b-and-benefits-6-figure-income-households-more-than-anyone/ss-AA1nHV9z?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=7eece753770c44139e7fb66d4374a515&ei=42

Reply
Apr 26, 2024 18:54:22   #
National Park
 
$700 billion in 2008 to bail out crooked, wealthy bankers.

Reply
Apr 26, 2024 23:45:30   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 



Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2024 01:11:08   #
FrumCA
 
Too bad it's not that simple.
There is no such thing as “forgiveness,” and student loan debt does not go away—it remains on the federal government’s books. Cancelation alone is estimated to cost at least $400 billion dollars. The Biden administration simply moved the loan debt, agreed to by millions of student loan borrowers, onto the backs of American taxpayers. Biden’s student loan bailout will cost every taxpayer, even those who never went to college, at least $2,500.

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 07:52:13   #
joehel2 Loc: Cherry Hill, NJ
 
Does this mean when can claim “College Student” as a dependent on our tax return this year.😊

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 09:28:25   #
DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods
 
I tried to find out but couldn’t .

Given How Rix explained it, is the cost to tax payers in reality lost income over future years.?

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 10:49:00   #
FrumCA
 
DennyT wrote:
I tried to find out but couldn’t .

Given How Rix explained it, is the cost to tax payers in reality lost income over future years.?

Maybe it can be written off as a bad loan.

Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2024 12:11:24   #
DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods
 
FrumCA wrote:
Maybe it can be written off as a bad loan.


That’s not what I ask . If a student borrowed 20k and has already paid back 30 and still owes 15 because of the loan structure how can that be costing the government anything. ?

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 12:22:58   #
FrumCA
 
DennyT wrote:
That’s not what I ask . If a student borrowed 20k and has already paid back 30 and still owes 15 because of the loan structure how can that be costing the government anything. ?

As I said, it's because the debt stays on the government's books.

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 13:19:10   #
Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
 
DennyT wrote:
That’s not what I ask . If a student borrowed 20k and has already paid back 30 and still owes 15 because of the loan structure how can that be costing the government anything. ?


Seems to me, and I don’t know, if Sallie Mae or a third party loan servicing company has the loan and the government is merely guaranteeing it then how is the taxpayer not on the hook for the balance regardless of the student’s payment history? Additionally, if you enter into an offer and compromise with a lender or credit card company doesn’t it wound your credit for a period (until rebuilt) and if so shouldn’t it happen to these students. Also no matter how you parse this argument using examples such as a person who has paid much more than the original loan is probably an exception rather than the rule and to lump everyone in the same basket regardless of history, need, etc. is merely buying votes and thumbing your nose at a SCOTUS ruling.

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 15:02:06   #
FrumCA
 
Effate wrote:
Seems to me, and I don’t know, if Sallie Mae or a third party loan servicing company has the loan and the government is merely guaranteeing it then how is the taxpayer not on the hook for the balance regardless of the student’s payment history? Additionally, if you enter into an offer and compromise with a lender or credit card company doesn’t it wound your credit for a period (until rebuilt) and if so shouldn’t it happen to these students. Also no matter how you parse this argument using examples such as a person who has paid much more than the original loan is probably an exception rather than the rule and to lump everyone in the same basket regardless of history, need, etc. is merely buying votes and thumbing your nose at a SCOTUS ruling.
Seems to me, and I don’t know, if Sallie Mae or a ... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2024 15:03:54   #
DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods
 
Effate wrote:
Seems to me, and I don’t know, if Sallie Mae or a third party loan servicing company has the loan and the government is merely guaranteeing it then how is the taxpayer not on the hook for the balance regardless of the student’s payment history? Additionally, if you enter into an offer and compromise with a lender or credit card company doesn’t it wound your credit for a period (until rebuilt) and if so shouldn’t it happen to these students. Also no matter how you parse this argument using examples such as a person who has paid much more than the original loan is probably an exception rather than the rule and to lump everyone in the same basket regardless of history, need, etc. is merely buying votes and thumbing your nose at a SCOTUS ruling.
Seems to me, and I don’t know, if Sallie Mae or a ... (show quote)


I think the discussion is about government loans no government guaranteed loans. Not sure.

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 15:05:48   #
DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods
 
FrumCA wrote:
As I said, it's because the debt stays on the government's books.


Then it is an accounting debt that has already been paid.
Right and is no cost to tax payer

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 16:07:02   #
DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods
 
Effate wrote:
Seems to me, and I don’t know, if Sallie Mae or a third party loan servicing company has the loan and the government is merely guaranteeing it then how is the taxpayer not on the hook for the balance regardless of the student’s payment history? Additionally, if you enter into an offer and compromise with a lender or credit card company doesn’t it wound your credit for a period (until rebuilt) and if so shouldn’t it happen to these students. Also no matter how you parse this argument using examples such as a person who has paid much more than the original loan is probably an exception rather than the rule and to lump everyone in the same basket regardless of history, need, etc. is merely buying votes and thumbing your nose at a SCOTUS ruling.
Seems to me, and I don’t know, if Sallie Mae or a ... (show quote)


One we are talking about direct government loans and two even in guaranteed loans government is only on the hook “ the student “ defaults. Do you have any source showing this is the case. ?
I don’t like real debts to be forgiven but some honesty is needed without spinning the numbers for pure political reasons .

Reply
Apr 27, 2024 16:15:16   #
Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
 
DennyT wrote:
One we are talking about direct government loans and two even in guaranteed loans government is only on the hook “ the student “ defaults. Do you have any source showing this is the case. ?
I don’t like real debts to be forgiven but some honesty is needed without spinning the numbers for pure political reasons .


I don’t favor one person being forgiven a dime that they are obligated to pay absent a showing of lender fraud or a school going broke leaving students high and dry (Trump U anyone). I’ll put that right up front but if there is any political spin it rests clearly on the party who is defying SCOTUS and buying votes.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.