Effate
Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
DennyT wrote:
Seems like you rely on “ semantics “a lot. Words have meanings . Ignoring or circumventing is not changing.
I feel like you are loosing something in the translation. If there is a law, rule or common practice and you do anything to deviate from that then you are changing the practice whether it is a one time occurrence or a permanent change.
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
Effate wrote:
I feel like you are loosing something in the translation. If there is a law, rule or common practice and you do anything to deviate from that then you are changing the practice whether it is a one time occurrence or a permanent change.
Speaking of semantics . !
Effate
Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
DennyT wrote:
Speaking of semantics . !
What I said is indisputable. Change is change.
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
Effate wrote:
What I said is indisputable. Change is change.
Manipulating is not changing the law. It is. Criminal act but the law is still the same.
Effate
Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
DennyT wrote:
Manipulating is not changing the law. It is. Criminal act but the law is still the same.
I’m sorry, not trying to be facetious but I have no idea what point you are trying to make.
DennyT wrote:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-super-pac-legal-bills-1235008114/
Ouch! He must be worth all the humiliation to someone.???
Rolling Stone - " ... Donald Trump‘s legal defense is expensive, and the invoices continue to pile up as the former president drains money from his political action committees to pay his attorneys. Trump has been using Save America, a super PAC he controls, to help pay for his legal bills, but after spending tens of millions of dollars on legal consulting, it may be running out of funds.
According to the latest campaign finance records, the Save America leadership PAC spent $4.6 million on legal bills for Trump and his associates in March while only bringing in $5 million last month. Trump’s spending on legal bills amounted to a quarter of the total expenditures by his political action committees in March, The Washington Post reported.
So far this year, $16.7 million in funds from Trump’s PACs have gone toward legal bills. At the end of last month, the PACs owed another $900,000 to legal firms. In total, Trump has expended approximately $86 million total in legal fees, according to The Post. ... "
Texcaster wrote:
Ouch! He must be worth all the humiliation to someone.???
Rolling Stone - " ... Donald Trump‘s legal defense is expensive, and the invoices continue to pile up as the former president drains money from his political action committees to pay his attorneys. Trump has been using Save America, a super PAC he controls, to help pay for his legal bills, but after spending tens of millions of dollars on legal consulting, it may be running out of funds.
According to the latest campaign finance records, the Save America leadership PAC spent $4.6 million on legal bills for Trump and his associates in March while only bringing in $5 million last month. Trump’s spending on legal bills amounted to a quarter of the total expenditures by his political action committees in March, The Washington Post reported.
So far this year, $16.7 million in funds from Trump’s PACs have gone toward legal bills. At the end of last month, the PACs owed another $900,000 to legal firms. In total, Trump has expended approximately $86 million total in legal fees, according to The Post. ... "
Ouch! He must be worth all the humiliation to some... (
show quote)
I wonder if the RNC will have to pick up the tab on legal fees for the AZ indictees. More and more lawsuits to watch.
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol makes no difference, Trump still beat Hillary with half the money she had. By the way Hillary still spent a lot more than Trump
ONLY because of the Enquirer's catch and kill efforts on stories which would have painted trump in a negative light.
If the truth about trump’s past transgressions had come out, it's highly likely that the outcome of the 2016 election would have been very different!
The NDA's on two of the three known catch and kill stories were released soon after the election was over. That's blatant election interference. The information needed to make a decision about which candidate to vote for was withheld from voters.
Where did I get my information? From the court transcripts.
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
ONLY because of the Enquirer's catch and kill efforts on stories which would have painted trump in a negative light.
If the truth about trump’s past transgressions had come out, it's highly likely that the outcome of the 2016 election would have been very different!
The NDA's on two of the three known catch and kill stories were released soon after the election was over. That's blatant election interference. The information needed to make a decision about which candidate to vote for was withheld from voters.
Where did I get my information? From the court transcripts.
ONLY because of the Enquirer's catch and kill effo... (
show quote)
Lol you always just come up with the bogus excuses. It doesn't matter what your excuses are Trump still beat Hillary with half the money that she had. What the heck are you talking about court transcripts? What does the court transcripts have anything to do with Trump meeting Hillary with half the money that she had??
Effate
Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
ONLY because of the Enquirer's catch and kill efforts on stories which would have painted trump in a negative light.
If the truth about trump’s past transgressions had come out, it's highly likely that the outcome of the 2016 election would have been very different!
The NDA's on two of the three known catch and kill stories were released soon after the election was over. That's blatant election interference. The information needed to make a decision about which candidate to vote for was withheld from voters.
Where did I get my information? From the court transcripts.
ONLY because of the Enquirer's catch and kill effo... (
show quote)
Catch and kill a story, where have I heard that technique being employed (but even on a scale way beyond those “enquiring minds”)? Oh yes, I believe it was 2020!
Racmanaz wrote:
Trump only had half the money and camping funds than what Hillary had and he still beat her.
Well, he should have gone camping instead of banging porn stars and committing fraud to cover it up.
Triple G wrote:
I wonder if the RNC will have to pick up the tab on legal fees for the AZ indictees. More and more lawsuits to watch.
Well one of the Arizona indictees is now a big part of the RNC and their voting integrity unit! HAHAHAHA!
McKinneyMike wrote:
Well one of the Arizona indictees is now a big part of the RNC and their voting integrity unit! HAHAHAHA!
Voting integrity? Republicans?
Like oil and water, you can try to put them together, but it doesn’t mix.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.