Kraken wrote:
Yes, our side but it wasn't all done by one person.
It’s done by multiple people multiple times.
Racmanaz wrote:
It’s done by multiple people multiple times.
And it is still not enough.
Ask your doctor if Adderall is right for you.
Racmanaz wrote:
Yeah, well don’t let the facts get in your way.
“Clinton and her allies, including her joint committees with the Democratic Party and the super PACs supporting her,
raised more than $1.2 billion for the full cycle, according to the last reports filed Thursday with the Federal Election Commission.
Trump and his allies collected about $600 million.” https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-clinton-campaign-fundraising-totals-232400Like DennyT said, trump got a whole boat load of FREE media coverage for the 2016 campaign!
That free media coverage was because trump was an anomaly who steamrolled over his competitors, AND thanks to peker and the National Enquirer's help with salacious or often fantasy stories about trump's competitors and the catch and kill scheme on the doorman's story about trump allegedly fathering a child out of wedlock, Karen McDougal, and Stormy Daniels.
Don't go trying to say that I'm a liar, those facts about peker and the National Enquirer came out at trial yesterday!
We all witnessed the huge amount of free media coverage trump got for his 2016 campaign. Every time we turned around, there was trump in yet another interview many times on what becam trump's favorite network, faux news. But rarely did the networks offer equal free air time to the other candidates running against trump.
Racmanaz wrote:
And how many times have your side repeated Trump‘s four indictments and 91 charges? I lost count.
It's down to 88 counts, but you failed to keep up with that fact, didn't you?
There's a whole world of difference between campaign fund raising and subsequently campaign spending, and FREE media coverage.
Hillary Clinton did get some free media coverage, but no where near the huge amount trump was afforded for the 2016 election.
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Like DennyT said, trump got a whole boat load of FREE media coverage for the 2016 campaign!
That free media coverage was because trump was an anomaly who steamrolled over his competitors, AND thanks to peker and the National Enquirer's help with salacious or often fantasy stories about trump's competitors and the catch and kill scheme on the doorman's story about trump allegedly fathering a child out of wedlock, Karen McDougal, and Stormy Daniels.
Don't go trying to say that I'm a liar, those facts about peker and the National Enquirer came out at trial yesterday!
We all witnessed the huge amount of free media coverage trump got for his 2016 campaign. Every time we turned around, there was trump in yet another interview many times on what becam trump's favorite network, faux news. But rarely did the networks offer equal free air time to the other candidates running against trump.
Like DennyT said, trump got a whole boat load of F... (
show quote)
You can make all the unfounded excuses you want, Trump still beat Hillary with half the money
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
It's down to 88 counts, but you failed to keep up with that fact, didn't you?
You are quite illiterate aren't you, I said that's what you Lefty cultists have been repeating which is true. The 4 indictments in 91 charges was the numbers that were repeated by your side.
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
There's a whole world of difference between campaign fund raising and subsequently campaign spending, and FREE media coverage.
Hillary Clinton did get some free media coverage, but no where near the huge amount trump was afforded for the 2016 election.
Lol makes no difference, Trump still beat Hillary with half the money she had. By the way Hillary still spent a lot more than Trump
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol makes no difference, Trump still beat Hillary with half the money she had. By the way Hillary still spent a lot more than Trump
But, he spent it on manipulating media per David Pecker and was lucky to get Comey's comments. Sometimes it's won by criminal activity. It's ancient history and Biden isn't Clinton, but trump is even worse.
Triple G wrote:
But, he spent it on manipulating media per David Pecker and was lucky to get Comey's comments. Sometimes it's luck that wins.
lol make all the unfounded excuses you want Trump only needed half the money that Hillary had and she was so arrogant she thought she had it in the bag.
Racmanaz wrote:
lol make all the unfounded excuses you want Trump only needed half the money that Hillary had and she was so arrogant she thought she had it in the bag.
What does that matter now? The OP is about money either winning or losing and trump may find out just how much it matters. Any comments on Clinton are just irrelevant; there's nothing comparable in those two elections. The only one comparable is the 2020 election.
Triple G wrote:
What does that matter now? The OP is about money either winning or losing and trump may find out just how much it matters. Any comments on Clinton are just irrelevant; there's nothing comparable in those two elections. The only one comparable is the 2020 election.
lol also, now you wanna twist and go back to the original post. My comments are pretty much the same has to do with the money
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.