Are RAW files really RAW?
Apr 20, 2024 12:43:43 #
......And, you were not even comparing noise reduction, because every different exposure & Iso had a different need for noise reduction.
There is no saving this effort, and certainly not by concluding everyone in the world is wrong except you.....
There is no saving this effort, and certainly not by concluding everyone in the world is wrong except you.....
Apr 20, 2024 12:48:04 #
JohnR wrote:
Everyone - including you, has missed the point completely! I was simply looking at the difference in noise reduction straight out of the camera between JPG & RAW for the different sensors.
Obviously people skip through the text, briefly look at the pics and then think of a criticism which they think will make them look good
Obviously people skip through the text, briefly look at the pics and then think of a criticism which they think will make them look good
Reading your text or not doesn’t change the fact that it’s a stupid experiment that doesn’t prove anything.
Apr 20, 2024 14:49:22 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Reading your text or not doesn’t change the fact that it’s a stupid experiment that doesn’t prove anything.
He did say he did it out of boredom. Nothing is wrong with doing that. I sometimes run casual real world checks of one thing against another. The only significant difference between his and mine is that I keep mine to myself.
When doing such stuff one may or may not dig up any useful data, but either way there is no rationale for posting personal casual tests as if they would have any value to anyone else !
If you extract any useful data from the below attached comparison, let me know, and maybe Ill invent enuf of a back story to publish it as an advice thread
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.