MrBob wrote:
The Apple Knockers have the " Trump Syndrome " or maybe it's just the Dunning Kruger effect manifesting itself.... The poor guy on the gallows is happy also after about 30 seconds.
OR, maybe Apple people just can't accept someone not wanting an Apple......
Kinda like "If you don't believe like I do, you're wrong.".
(Can't be that, they're too perfect.
)
And you HAD to go and make it political.....
I use a Mac Studio - and couldn't be more pleased
The kind of photography you do now and expect to do in the future, has significant implications for the system you choose. Any modern mid spec'ed machine is adequate for basic photo sharing and basic editing.
But a user who shoots large volumes of high res pictures and or does pano stitching or video will benefit from a beefed up machine.
In a desktop a separate ssd for pictures or video is often very helpful , it allows your boot drive to remain uncluttered while making your photo assets that much easier to back up.
'Just Fred' suggested a build to order based on the kind of work you expect to do, That is a very good suggestion if you are a Windows user. Most off the shelf windows machines ten to be organized more around gaming than graphics . A BTO system looks at the software requirements you will actually use and optimizes for those.
RAM and storage are historically cheap so MORE at the time of purchase is usually a good idea.
With Macs being SOC (system on a Chip) based you need to pick RAM at time of purchase.
Be honest with yourself about what your current & future needs will be and how much and what features you will use in Photoshop. What size display, what resolution, one display or two etc
No one can tell you "what's a good photo system for you" without understanding the kind of work you intend to do.
A modest system MAY be all you need, or it my be a purchase you regret.
I am not suggesting that you buy a vastly more powerful system than you need, but I am suggesting you figure out what you need to make the experience enjoyable with room to grow
Good Luck
MrBob
Loc: lookout Mtn. NE Alabama
Longshadow wrote:
OR, maybe Apple people just can't accept someone n... (
show quote)
Actually I was going to ask which was better, Canon or Nikon... BUT !
niteman3d
Loc: South Central Pennsylvania, USA
MrBob wrote:
Actually I was going to ask which was better, Canon or Nikon... BUT !
Whichever meets one's needs the best.
SIMPLE.
mikeroetex wrote:
Last August I bought a Mac mini with M2 Pro chip, 512 SDD and a 4TB external drive placed in a hub. Only apps on the 512 SDD, all data on 4TB external (connected with Thunderbird 4 cable) and two backup storage drives of 5TB and 8TB plus Backblaze cloud. I find this setup blazing fast for me and have never looked back. All are attached to 27" Dell monitor.
I have the "lowly" M1 MacBook Air with 16GB/1TB and a bunch of externals plus a 27" LG monitor. It runs the Adobe suite just fine. I haven't choked it yet. I loved it so much I got my wife one for Christmas.
Maybe when the M5 models are out, I'll see enough change to upgrade. Hopefully by then, Apple will have its AI tools ready for prime time.
3 years ago I bought an "I BUY POWER" unit through Costco. It has very accessible and upgradeable components. It is an i7-9700F CPU @ 3.00GHz with 64 BIT OS. It is water cooled 64G RAM and NVideo 8G graphics card, a 500 Gig SSD and 2TB HD. It is fast, reliable and was under $1500. It included LED mouse and LED keyboard, 4 LED fans and multiple USB ports. The great thing is Costco's return policy and the machines are specific to Costco's specs.I bought a LG HD 4K 32" display to go with it for $200.
therwol wrote:
This machine has 32GB RAM. That's more than adequate. It also has two hard drives, one SSD (512GB) and one HDD (1TB). That's fine too. The price is good. The only thing I see that it doesn't have is a dedicated graphics card. Depending on what you do, it may not matter, but it might if you're editing video. Video editors sometimes make heavy use of the graphics GPU. Anyway, fine machine on a budget. Some on UHH are going to suggest spending megabucks or having a custom machine built. Whatever suits them, but buying from Costco is the easiest thing in the world.
This machine has 32GB RAM. That's more than adeq... (
show quote)
My build from micro center was 200 more than your Costco machine and has double the ram and a 2780 super GPU. I had a 3rd hd added for an additional hundred. Micro center is a great company and has great service and warranty
Drbobcameraguy wrote:
My build from micro center was 200 more than your Costco machine and has double the ram and a 2780 super GPU. I had a 3rd hd added for an additional hundred. Micro center is a great company and has great service and warranty
There' probably a bunch of computers that are comparable in operation and price.
I don't need a super GPU though.
For some, it's a must have. Their choice.
DougS
Loc: Central Arkansas
You did not state how much you are willing to spend, but you can get more for your money if you build it yourself (yes, you can do it yourself!). I built my own, after doing quite a bit of research. My computer tech son has dibs on it if/when I die (or want to get rid of it)! But so do several (read ALL) of the other computer literate kiddos!
I looked for quite a while before deciding what I wanted; then decided to build it myself! I used pcpartpicker system builder.
The processor should be for a 'gaming' computer. They have more processing power for photo editing, plus will be good for many years of your type of use.
I used 'pcpartpicker system builder'. Just looking at the types of parts available helped me decide what I wanted. Its not as hard as you would think! 'google' " how to build a gaming computer " for lots of info!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.