Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Best online site to display prints
Page <prev 2 of 2
Apr 4, 2024 15:04:19   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
imagemeister wrote:
So far, IMO, UHH is the best place to display images .......I use Fine Art America to sell .....$30 a year.


Uhh is not a place to display to public.

Reply
Apr 4, 2024 15:07:26   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
frankraney wrote:
Some people did not read your post right. Sometimes some of them can be snarky, but not this time. They miss read your post.

I see no mention of displaying prints online on the above post.


Try (re) reading the subject line of the post ....

Reply
Apr 4, 2024 15:38:42   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
frankraney wrote:
Some people did not read your post right. Sometimes some of them can be snarky, but not this time. They miss read your post.

I see no mention of displaying prints online on the above post.


It’s in the headline!

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2024 16:02:10   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
It’s in the headline!


AND, there NO mention of the "public" ....

Reply
Apr 4, 2024 17:37:45   #
cbtsam Loc: Monkton, MD
 
Aloysius wrote:
Im looking for something that’s a bit more upscale than Flickr—any thoughts?


I imagine I'm just being dense - yet again - but in what way "more upscale" than Flickr? More expensive? Fancier website? Fewer low income users? Fewer images that seem unappealing?

Reply
Apr 4, 2024 22:12:53   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Try (re) reading the subject line of the post ....


He knows he can't display prints. Only a digital copy. I did not read the post that he really wants to display prints. I took it as just a figure of speech.

Reply
Apr 4, 2024 22:48:04   #
Aloysius Loc: Tampa, FL
 
You’ve got it right of course—I know anything on line is a digital file, ideally optimized for web display. I’m not trying to sell anything, nor was I denigrating Flicker. I was simply inquiring if there were sites that were more ‘professional looking than Flickr (whatever ‘professional’ might might mean.)

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2024 01:01:27   #
User ID
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Are you looking for a site to sell your work or just show it? If it’s the latter and you’re an Adobe subscriber you can easily set up your own website with MyPortfolio, which is included in your subscription.

Thread title (FWIW) says "Display".

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 04:56:46   #
User ID
 
zug55 wrote:
Yep, you can't display prints online.
.

"Cant display prints online" ?!?

Oh, right ... acoarst not ! Just like you cant display engravings, or paintings, or sculpture, or sneakers or dogs etc etc etc.

The OP wanting an "upscale" venue strongly suggests that hard copy might be depicted as an "art object", perhaps as merchandise.

But unlike paintings or bicycles or sketches, a photo print is special in that you dont need to digitize the art object cuz its origin is digital (not news, acoarst). Therein lies the rub.

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 11:24:57   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
Aloysius wrote:
You’ve got it right of course—I know anything on line is a digital file, ideally optimized for web display. I’m not trying to sell anything, nor was I denigrating Flicker. I was simply inquiring if there were sites that were more ‘professional looking than Flickr (whatever ‘professional’ might might mean.)


If you’re not looking to sell and are an Adobe subscriber I again say checkout MyPortfolio since it’s included.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.