Which do you like?
Mar 30, 2024 13:32:35 #
# 2 My Sister-in-law is an artist she made me one similar to #2 I have to put my signature in but I am having trouble trying to shrink it down. When I do my signature in photoshop I go down to 18 points. When I first saw that on Facebook I said I just have to have that.
Mar 30, 2024 14:31:52 #
Mar 30, 2024 22:21:12 #
Lucian
Loc: From Wales, living in Ohio
I'd suggest number 4
1. is too small of a word for Photography and the camera overpowers your name, which is a bit large anyway.
2. is too busy, as nice as it is.
3. also a nice design but limits you to wildlife photography, in case you chose to branch out into other photography forms at a later time. This number 3 would not owrk for portraits, weddings, family photos etc. Therfore you are limiting yourself from the very start.
4. This is the best because it is simplistic, easy in black on white or white on black or any other colour. The camera is not too large, neither is your name or the word photography. However, that font used for the word Photography is not the best. It is too thin in sections of the letters and can become lost when printed on some things. I would go with the font used for the photography, in your first sample or something extremely close. Then you'll have the best of all worlds in photography logos. That is, until the world sees cameras as a different shape, because then, that camera shape will have dated itself too much.
1. is too small of a word for Photography and the camera overpowers your name, which is a bit large anyway.
2. is too busy, as nice as it is.
3. also a nice design but limits you to wildlife photography, in case you chose to branch out into other photography forms at a later time. This number 3 would not owrk for portraits, weddings, family photos etc. Therfore you are limiting yourself from the very start.
4. This is the best because it is simplistic, easy in black on white or white on black or any other colour. The camera is not too large, neither is your name or the word photography. However, that font used for the word Photography is not the best. It is too thin in sections of the letters and can become lost when printed on some things. I would go with the font used for the photography, in your first sample or something extremely close. Then you'll have the best of all worlds in photography logos. That is, until the world sees cameras as a different shape, because then, that camera shape will have dated itself too much.
Mar 31, 2024 01:01:11 #
RickL wrote:
Number 1 shows the most class. It is by far the most professional
It doesn’t have to be stuffy and formal to be professional.
Mar 31, 2024 01:19:05 #
It seems there’s a lot of votes for #2, but I like #3, with 2 as runner up.
Mar 31, 2024 10:30:12 #
Mar 31, 2024 13:50:07 #
Mar 31, 2024 15:50:10 #
Mar 31, 2024 15:56:15 #
Mar 31, 2024 16:04:19 #
Mar 31, 2024 16:19:43 #
Photolady2014 wrote:
A photography friend of mine made these for me since I'm not much with a computer except editing.
Which do you like?
Which do you like?
I like the 4th one. Not limited to wildlife photography.
Mar 31, 2024 19:59:38 #
Mar 31, 2024 20:52:29 #
Apr 1, 2024 00:48:19 #
Apr 1, 2024 08:32:12 #
Photolady2014 wrote:
A photography friend of mine made these for me since I'm not much with a computer except editing.
Which do you like?
Which do you like?
#3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.