Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Equivalent focal length - a more correct way to compare
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
Mar 31, 2024 01:35:10   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
a6k wrote:
Wrong. They affect ability to crop for small distant subjects.


Missing the point completely.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 10:06:02   #
User ID
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I have no issue with User ID. He made a valid point. Jeez. I guess that means he’s also ignoring UHH sacred traditions.

The bozo who wrote that will sometimes post inuendo that we two are one person running two accounts ... but hes typically inconsistent in his "logic". Basically hes just kinda grumpy and humorless. This is an entertaiment site and seems to thrive on having a wide cast of typecast players, so he has a specific role in the overall success of the site. UHH rolls on.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 10:08:20   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
Bruce T wrote:
But depth of field is important. If you want a very shallow depth of field, you need a fast lens…f/1.2,f/1.4. If you want everything in focus you can use a f2/8 or f/5.6 lens and set it at f/8 for your shot.



DOF is sometimes important. I don't see how a fast lens has anything to do with DOF.

DOF is controlled mostly by lens mm, distance to subject, f stop

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2024 10:27:49   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
User ID wrote:
The bozo who wrote that will sometimes post inuendo that we two are one person running two accounts ... but hes typically inconsistent in his "logic". Basically hes just kinda grumpy and humorless. This is an entertaiment site and seems to thrive on having a wide cast of typecast players, so he has a specific role in the overall success of the site. UHH rolls on.


That’s the only reason I engage him. I feel it’s a duty of my role here.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 10:29:13   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
frankraney wrote:
DOF is sometimes important. I don't see how a fast lens has anything to do with DOF.

DOF is controlled mostly by lens mm, distance to subject, f stop


Well “fast” means a wider f stop. Seems pretty straightforward to me.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 10:34:09   #
BebuLamar
 
frankraney wrote:
DOF is sometimes important. I don't see how a fast lens has anything to do with DOF.

DOF is controlled mostly by lens mm, distance to subject, f stop


Fast lenses give you shallow depth of field. Today it's about the only reason to have fast lens. Imaging sensor can do so well at high ISO that fast lenses for more light isn't needed any more.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 11:07:58   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Well “fast” means a wider f stop. Seems pretty straightforward to me.


Completing the concept for the noobs among us: Wider apertures allow more light to hit the sensor or film, so you need less time to complete the exposure. A shorter open shutter interval is described as a faster shutter speed. So a "fast" lens is one with a wide aperture that allows a "faster shutter speed." "Faster shutter speeds" stop faster action or action closer to the camera.

The lens itself isn't fast or slow. It just exists and lets a specific maximum amount of light through. But we describe it with shorthand when we compare... with a specific intent in mind.

There was an old pro at the camera store I dealt with in the 1970s who explained concepts like this to new customers. He deconstructed all the terminology and explained where it came from. When you know the WHY, the what to do or not do becomes obvious (to most people).

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2024 11:58:54   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Well “fast” means a wider f stop. Seems pretty straightforward to me.


True, but it is only one component for DOG. it also is used for a faster shutter speed. And a longer lens can give shallower DOF ( just have to be careful with compression). A fast lens let's more light in and allows for a faster shutter speed. The three things I mentioned control DOF more than a fast lens.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 13:09:59   #
Retina Loc: Near Charleston,SC
 
jerryc41 wrote:
This seems to be a very contentious topic. I wish camera makers could have thought of a better way to state the focal length for the various sensors. Someone will post something about the focal length he used, and someone else will say he's incorrect. It's the "equivalent" focal length. Does it really matter? No. You select your lens or your zoom length, and you take a picture.

A similar topic is "depth of field." That's been beaten to death, but it keeps coming back to life. Something is either in focus or it isn't.
This seems to be a very contentious topic. I wish... (show quote)

The proportion of camera buyers who know what FL means using a 35mm film camera will decrease. When 35mm film cameras are seen mostly on museum shelves and later generations ask what is meant by filming a scene or taping a conversation, I wonder if the equiv. FL for any non-FF camera will also lose its significance altogether. Maybe it will be replaced by the angle or range in degrees in the field of view or something else not tied to a historical standard.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 13:25:39   #
BebuLamar
 
Retina wrote:
The proportion of camera buyers who know what FL means using a 35mm film camera will decrease. When 35mm film cameras are seen mostly on museum shelves and later generations ask what is meant by filming a scene or taping a conversation, I wonder if the equiv. FL for any non-FF camera will also lose its significance altogether. Maybe it will be replaced by the angle or range in degrees in the field of view or something else not tied to a historical standard.


As it should be stated in the beginning. Stating the actual focal length of the lens, the size of the sensor and perhaps the angle of view is much better than 35mm equivalent focal length.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 18:59:19   #
BebuLamar
 
a6k wrote:
I used two cameras+lenses:

Sony 𝜶6500 with Minolta 500/8 AF Reflex (EXIF reports 496 mm = 744) The lens is fixed length.
Sony RX10 IV with 220 mm lens (EXIF reports 220 mm=600). The zoom lens is not interchangeable.

Using a tripod, I shot the same target at the same distance with the RX10 at longest setting (Minolta is a prime). The picture, exposure, etc. are not important because the dimensions of the lenses, sensors and distance to target are the only things being compared.

744 / 600 = 1.24 so if the equivalent focal length were really only about the physical size of the sensor, the displayed image from the 𝜶6500 would be 1.24 times the size of the one from the RX10 IV.

Skip the math. The screenshot shown here tells me that in order to make the shot taken with the RX10 IV as large as the one taken with the 𝜶6500 + Minolta 500 it was necessary to increase the smaller image by 49%.

If we care about what the equivalent focal length means then either the 𝜶6500 is 894 or the RX10 is 499.
Of course, the truth could be some mixture/hybrid of the two discrepancies.

It's a shame there is no standard to use for pixels per mm on the sensor so all we can do is compare lens and sensor combinations to each other. The discrepancy here appears to be the difference in pixels per mm in the horizontal dimension of the sensor.

The second screenshot that I added as an edit shows the RX10 shot with one using the 𝜶6500 with a Sony 70-400 on which the EXIF says 400=600. Same two cameras, supposed to be the same equivalent length. Twelve % difference.
I used two cameras+lenses: br br Sony 𝜶6500 with... (show quote)


Well your comparison isn't right. I am looking for someone with a Nikon Df and D850. Using the same lens and do your test. You will see the 2 cameras which have same size sensor using same lens the size of the subject is much different when you do a 100% zoom in editing software.

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2024 19:41:39   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
frankraney wrote:
True, but it is only one component for DOG. it also is used for a faster shutter speed. And a longer lens can give shallower DOF ( just have to be careful with compression). A fast lens let's more light in and allows for a faster shutter speed. The three things I mentioned control DOF more than a fast lens.


I’m not sure if you’re just dense or being disingenuous. A fast lens lets more light in specifically because it has a larger aperture and that larger aperture is the #1 thing for shallow depth of field.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 19:44:34   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Well your comparison isn't right. I am looking for someone with a Nikon Df and D850. Using the same lens and do your test. You will see the 2 cameras which have same size sensor using same lens the size of the subject is much different when you do a 100% zoom in editing software.


Could it be because the df is a ff camera and the 850 is a dx, ff vs crop sensor? And what is the lens made for?

Same size Sensor in what, pixels?

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 19:51:02   #
BebuLamar
 
frankraney wrote:
Could it be because the df is a ff camera and the 850 is a dx, ff vs crop sensor? And what is the lens made for?

Same size Sensor in what, pixels?


No both are FX (FF). The difference is that the Df is only 16MP and the D850 is 45MP. Any Nikon F mount lens it doesn't matter. Just use the same lens.
Take a picture with each camera. Same distance from camera to subject. Same lens. display both in PS and zoom to 100%. The subject in the D850 image is 1.7 times the one from the Df.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 19:57:19   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I’m not sure if you’re just dense or being disingenuous. A fast lens lets more light in specifically because it has a larger aperture and that larger aperture is the #1 thing for shallow depth of field.


What was stated was a fast lens was needed to control DOF. As I stated (and it is correct) DOF is controlled by, lens mm, apperature, and distance to subject.

I also stated a fast lens let's more light in, allowing for faster shutter speed. Can you get a shallow DOF with one, yes, but it is only one component, but not necessary, a shallow DOF can be had at lower apertures,



Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.