Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
First image from Hasselblad!
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Mar 31, 2024 07:26:38   #
ecobin Loc: Paoli, PA
 
I like it. Did you do anything in post after scanning, such as sharpening?

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 07:29:22   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Thank you for a lovely photo. I often wish I still had one of my Hasselblads to use for film. They are a pleasure just using them.

Dennis

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 08:28:47   #
agillot
 
I dont blow , i vacuum with a shop minivac .

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2024 08:50:43   #
mvetrano2 Loc: Commack, NY
 
nice, but logo is very distracting!

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 09:20:22   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
Robertl594 wrote:
Nicely done!!!


Thank you, Robert.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 09:28:39   #
jederick Loc: Northern Utah
 
Terrific image, Kathy...The Hasse is a keeper!!

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 09:31:25   #
photon-collector Loc: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
 
jim quist wrote:
Now you have me wanting to buy some 220 film and start using my old hasselblads.


Unfortunately, Jim, 220 film is no longer available...

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2024 09:31:26   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
jederick wrote:
Terrific image, Kathy...The Hasse is a keeper!!


Thanks, Jederick. I believe it is!

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 09:31:57   #
randave2001 Loc: Richmond
 
Well done. Haven't used film for many, many years now.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 09:32:22   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
photon-collector wrote:
Unfortunately, Jim, 220 film is no longer available...


That's what they told me at Tempe Camera. And if you should find some, don't buy it!

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 09:36:59   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
randave2001 wrote:
Well done. Haven't used film for many, many years now.


Thanks. Nor have I. I have five film cameras and have film in the freezer. But I'll admit to seldom taking it with me. Something has to be "film worthy" for me to take it. The Hasse is so easy to use, it may change my mind!

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2024 09:40:19   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
AzPicLady wrote:
On Wednesday I took the new Hasselblad with a roll of Ektar 100 out to the river to see what the Hasse would do with my favorite local mountain. I got the roll developed that afternoon by TCR and came home with the negs to do the scanning. Ever since then I've been working to clean up the dust spots. (That's why I don't like scanning!) I found a spot where I could get some foreground interest in the frame for Cany143.

The resulting TIFF is 201 mg. Sort of large, no?

I think this camera is a keeper. It's easy to use and gives pretty nice results. What do you think?
On Wednesday I took the new Hasselblad with a roll... (show quote)


I just downloaded your picture and look at the image at 100%. Unless you have weird clouds where you live, the sky should not look like that. The blue appears mottled, not even. There are broad areas of irregular white where there shouldn't be any. I don't believe that this is caused by dust. So A. Get someone else to develop your film and see if the results are the same, or B. You're creating artifacts from removing dust spots in a photo editor (seems unlikely but possible.)

I have scanned thousands of negatives and slides. Dust spots have a sharp margin. Same with hair from my dogs that got on them. These are my thoughts.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 09:52:42   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
I agree, WOW! , great detail & clarity. It's a keeper! What model camera & lens? More than 1 lens? I guess you clean the scanner & blow the negative off with air before scanning. Still, I imagine after the scan, you see the things you can't see with the eye like in macro.

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 10:05:36   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
👍💕👍

Reply
Mar 31, 2024 10:24:23   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
therwol wrote:
I just downloaded your picture and look at the image at 100%. Unless you have weird clouds where you live, the sky should not look like that. The blue appears mottled, not even. There are broad areas of irregular white where there shouldn't be any. I don't believe that this is caused by dust. So A. Get someone else to develop your film and see if the results are the same, or B. You're creating artifacts from removing dust spots in a photo editor (seems unlikely but possible.)

I have scanned thousands of negatives and slides. Dust spots have a sharp margin. Same with hair from my dogs that got on them. These are my thoughts.
I just downloaded your picture and look at the ima... (show quote)


The mottling in the sky is from my trying to remove the thousands of dust spots! The company that developed the film is the top place in the Valley, so I don't fault them. I fault the scanner. It creates horrid dust spots!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.