Which do you like?
Mar 26, 2024 13:52:38 #
OhioJoe
Loc: Columbia Station
Photolady2014 wrote:
A photography friend of mine made these for me since I'm not much with a computer except editing.
Which do you like?
Which do you like?
I like the first one
Mar 26, 2024 14:06:25 #
Generally speaking, I prefer #1; if the intent is to present oneself as a specialist in wildlife photography, then #3.
Mar 26, 2024 14:16:55 #
Photolady2014 wrote:
A photography friend of mine made these for me since I'm not much with a computer except editing.
Which do you like?
Which do you like?
I'd keep them all. #s 2 and/or 4 for general use, #1 for formal work and weddings. And of course #3 for wildlife. If I could only choose one, it might well be #4. Good luck.
Mar 26, 2024 14:26:54 #
JFCoupe
Loc: Kent, Washington
I like #1 if you are a wedding/portrait photographer. It is very classy/professional looking. Number 2 is nice, much more graphic and would work for many professional opportunities.
#3 is not quite bold enough in its colors, in my opinion, but I like the design and it fits if you are doing more landscape or even wildlife photography.
Number 4 is striking.
I just convinced myself that I like all of them. Nice work by your friend.
#3 is not quite bold enough in its colors, in my opinion, but I like the design and it fits if you are doing more landscape or even wildlife photography.
Number 4 is striking.
I just convinced myself that I like all of them. Nice work by your friend.
Mar 26, 2024 14:32:11 #
Mar 26, 2024 14:34:13 #
Mar 26, 2024 14:39:22 #
Mar 26, 2024 14:43:34 #
Definitely NOT #4. Too ornate and would be hard to read when smaller on cornet of a print, etc. #3 is not as bad but, to some extent, does share the problem. Between #1 and #2: #1 is easiest to read, but #2 looks less like many. many other logos. What you want is is a design that attracts attention, quickly conveys what it refers to (easy to read is part of this). If you are going to specialize in wildlife photography and the word "wildlife" to #1 or #2. If you are not limiting yourself to this don't use the word. And if you use #2 make the camera outline more obvious, more like #1. The outline in #2 is obvious to those in this forum, but it won't be to the general public. Then again, if you are not using the logo commercially, who cares? This is based on my having spent many years in new product marketing.
Mar 26, 2024 14:57:48 #
Mar 26, 2024 15:15:35 #
M1911
Loc: DFW Metromess
In number one the camera looks too heavy and distracts from your name.
For a watermark I would choose Number 4. It could be white or black or whatever color works with the photo.
For a watermark I would choose Number 4. It could be white or black or whatever color works with the photo.
Mar 26, 2024 15:29:59 #
After reviewing the numerous suggestions already posted, It reminded me of an old joke about asking 2 attorneys (or doctors) for their opinions and you'll get 3 answers.
As the vast majority of your photography is wildlife, #3 fits that bill best, but I suggest you dispense with all our advice and go with the one you like best....what do we know!
Please, just keep posting your work.
As the vast majority of your photography is wildlife, #3 fits that bill best, but I suggest you dispense with all our advice and go with the one you like best....what do we know!
Please, just keep posting your work.
Mar 26, 2024 15:32:53 #
Mar 26, 2024 15:36:02 #
Mar 26, 2024 15:40:48 #
Mar 26, 2024 16:11:22 #
Heaththiel
Loc: Wisconsin
Tough one Beth, but I think I'd choose No. 2 first and right behind that, No. 1
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.