black mamba wrote:
Thanks for your input, Dennis. I'm subject to try anything. But that's not really the way I normally would look at a flower. That way would have more merit with me if there was a feature of the flower below the plane of the petals...something of interest that I want to show. And that's my ultimate goal, present the flower with its best foot forward. No doubt I'll run across instances where your suggestion bears fruit.
I assume you're on home grounds now?
Yes I am back in Idaho. Fishing has been a bit slow but hopefully will pick up.
Good luck on your photography journey. You are on the right track.