Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Do you carry anything unusual in your camera bag?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 18 next> last>>
Mar 5, 2024 06:47:41   #
Mau
 
Good to know!!

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 07:10:11   #
Mr. B Loc: eastern Connecticut
 
Retired CPO wrote:
I carry a Model 1911 .45 ACP! Don't know if that would be considered unusual??


Nope. I carry a SIG365.

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 07:17:25   #
ecobin Loc: Paoli, PA
 
Acetaminophen

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2024 07:20:05   #
BurghByrd Loc: Pittsburgh
 
dennis2146 wrote:
No offense to your cousin but a 45 ACP would be considered small to the bears of Alaska. That round generally is not known for penetration unless a specific bullet is loaded to give more penetration. But even still it is not considered a good caliber to STOP a bear coming toward you. If the bear has no idea you are there and it is closer than 25 yards a shot to the ear would work well. Otherwise many other calibers would be a better choice.

Dennis


True, for that case a 454 casull would be a better choice. But, the odds of an attack by a bi-pedal predator are much more likely and for that case the venerable 45 acp is an effective choice. My preference is 357 sig. but the platforms chambered for it are limited.

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 07:20:54   #
BurghByrd Loc: Pittsburgh
 
MJPerini wrote:
Well, I don’t carry any firearms but I do carry one item that has been useful countless times
A cheap white plastic shower curtain liner.
It makes a great reflector, a great rain cover, a good tarp for gear or to set my bag on or for me to kneel on in mud or sand.
If it gets too grungy, I throw it away. I buy a half dozen at a time at Walmart
Not nearly as interesting as a Colt 45


good idea.

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 07:23:42   #
sourdough58 Loc: Maine
 
Retired CPO wrote:
I carry a Model 1911 .45 ACP! Don't know if that would be considered unusual??


one of my favorites

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 07:27:03   #
Mr. B Loc: eastern Connecticut
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Now that is a possibility and of course a much wiser choice. I have a number of 45 Colt revolvers, one I just shot yesterday, a 1939 Colt New Service, using an old Elmer Keith load of 9 grains of Unique powder under a 260 grain cast 454 bullet. I would have no problem dropping a deer or elk if the bullet was placed in the right place. Another I shot yesterday was a Freedom Arms Model 97 lightweight 5 shot, also in 45 Colt. I have shot that one with some 300 grain cast bullets and would feel comfortable using it if necessary on a charging bear. It does not handle those cartridges well though due to a very heavy recoil. Those 300 grain bullets are more likely to be used in either one of two Ruger Bisley 45 Colt revolvers I have. Those bullets would give great penetration but of course would have to be placed well on a charging bear. Even a shot from a heavy rifle would have to be placed correctly on a charging bear.

I like your terminology of 45 Long Colt. Many say it is not a proper name for the old 1873 Colt cartridge but I think it is properly named. The shorter 45 cartridge of the time would have been the 45 Schofield, shorter than the Long Colt and used in the Smith and Wesson top break revolver.

We really need to get together to do some shooting and fishing.

One more comment is my personal 1911-A1 series 70 45 ACP has Smith and Wesson adjustable rear sights installed by an old gunsmith in the 1970's, James Hoag. It was somewhat common at the time and was a great addition to a 1911 giving it target sights but very low on the slide. I carried it off duty most of the time back in the 70's.

Dennis
Now that is a possibility and of course a much wis... (show quote)


That Elmer Keith load with a hard swaged bullet would probably take care of a bear with any head shot...the heck with aiming for that little ear while under a "bit" of stress.

One of my favorite Ruger single action revolvers (I have them in four calibers) is an early Blackhawk Convertible with a 4.6" barrel in .45 ACP/.45 Long Colt. I practice with the somewhat cheaper .45 ACP.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2024 07:32:42   #
Mr. B Loc: eastern Connecticut
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Uhm I don't have a camera bag. I used to carry a 1911 back before 1975 but I was very bad. I couldn't hit a pop can at 30feet.


With a lot of the old .45 ACPs that would be perfectly normal. Now, if you couldn't hit a six-pack at 30 feet...

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 07:34:59   #
Mr. B Loc: eastern Connecticut
 
Dennis833 wrote:
We only have Teddy Bears in Australia.


Yes, but from what I've heard, they can be nasty little buggers!

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 07:37:21   #
Mr. B Loc: eastern Connecticut
 
billnikon wrote:
When I did wedding photography, I carried 20 colors of thread, 3 bobby pin colors, a toy car and a quarter, and two bottles of water.


Okay, you got me. What was the quarter for?

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 07:44:47   #
richardsaccount
 
I hope that you never had to employ the heat.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2024 08:18:43   #
home brewer Loc: Fort Wayne, Indiana
 
Retired CPO
I agree although I tend toward Glock G24 or G23

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 08:20:10   #
Warhorse Loc: SE Michigan
 
Retired CPO wrote:
I carry a Model 1911 .45 ACP! Don't know if that would be considered unusual??




Although, I'm not a fan myself of off body carry.

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 08:43:37   #
don1047 Loc: Colorado
 
Toilet paper.

Reply
Mar 5, 2024 09:08:21   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
Retired CPO wrote:
I carry a Model 1911 .45 ACP! Don't know if that would be considered unusual??


It's just common sense if you are lugging $5-10 M in equipment with you. I'd carry if I were lugging that much cash, so why not the same rational with cameras.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 18 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.