Abortion Access has that much support.
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Abortion Access has that much support.
There has been so much misinformation regarding the supreme court ruling on abortion. The supreme court did not outlaw abortion. They said that it was a state issue not a federal issue. So they are leaving it up to each state to establish the boundaries.
rcarol wrote:
There has been so much misinformation regarding the supreme court ruling on abortion. The supreme court did not outlaw abortion. They said that it was a state issue not a federal issue. So they are leaving it up to each state to establish the boundaries.
So the people that give birth should just calm the hell down?
Texcaster wrote:
So the people that give birth should just calm the hell down?
Seriously? Aren't you and your fellow geezers shooting blanks?
Texcaster wrote:
So the people that give birth should just calm the hell down?
I don’t understand the point you are trying to make.
rcarol wrote:
I don’t understand the point you are trying to make.
Was that unexpected coming from that mentally disturbed weirdo?
rcarol wrote:
There has been so much misinformation regarding the supreme court ruling on abortion. The supreme court did not outlaw abortion. They said that it was a state issue not a federal issue. So they are leaving it up to each state to establish the boundaries.
Abortion bans are resulting in doctors leaving states with restrictive abortion bans, and new doctors avoiding "conservative" states.
The recent Alabama IVF ban is leading to copycat bans in other "conservative" states.
Where will these invasive restrictions stop?
How deeply into your lives are you willing to let the religious zealots go before you start screaming that they've gone too far?
Remember that those religious zealots are in the MINORITY, but they're writing laws or adjudicating against the MAJORITY of residents in the United States.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tom-parker-alabama-ivf-embryo_n_65d7ea34e4b0cc1f2f7b3e26
rcarol wrote:
There has been so much misinformation regarding the supreme court ruling on abortion. The supreme court did not outlaw abortion. They said that it was a state issue not a federal issue. So they are leaving it up to each state to establish the boundaries.
Tell that to a woman who is pregnant with a non-viable fetus who is being forced to endure the emotional and physical pain of carrying a fetus which she will then have to watch suffer and die.
gorgehiker wrote:
Tell that to a woman who is pregnant with a non-viable fetus who is being forced to endure the emotional and physical pain of carrying a fetus which she will then have to watch suffer and die.
What an ignorant and uneducated response. What does your response have to do with what he said?
Racmanaz wrote:
What an ignorant and uneducated response. What does your response have to do with what he said?
Tell that to the women that want to have a choice about how big their families are going to be. You might want to brush-up on "white extinction in the US". It drives the MAGA's mandatory-white-birth-imperative.
It's no longer a federal issue.
the number of abortions has not changed since SCOTUS overturned Roe vs Wade.
Women should do whatever they want with their bodies.as long as taxpayers don't have to pay for it.
Taxpayers should be required to vote for approval of all legislation requiring the expenditure mod taxpayer funds. In addition, all voting approval are required to pay if the legislation passes.
johnnievegas wrote:
the number of abortions has not changed since SCOTUS overturned Roe vs Wade.
Women should do whatever they want with their bodies.as long as taxpayers don't have to pay for it.
Taxpayers should be required to vote for approval of all legislation requiring the expenditure mod taxpayer funds. In addition, all voting approval are required to pay if the legislation passes.
"Taxpayers should be required to vote for approval of all legislation requiring the expenditure mod taxpayer funds. In addition, all voting approval are required to pay if the legislation passes." _
-johnnievegas" I have three questions:
1 How will schools be financed if only PARENTS vote and pay for them.
2 If one doesn't vote for infrastructure improvements, how will the Government prevent them from using: Bridges, Highways, Rest stops, trains, etc.
3 If one is an Anti-War activist, they don't have to pay taxes for the war effort?
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
"Taxpayers should be required to vote for approval of all legislation requiring the expenditure mod taxpayer funds. In addition, all voting approval are required to pay if the legislation passes." _
-johnnievegas"
I have three questions:
1 How will schools be financed if only PARENTS vote and pay for them.
2 If one doesn't vote for infrastructure improvements, how will the Government prevent them from using: Bridges, Highways, Rest stops, trains, etc.
3 If one is an Anti-War activist, they don't have to pay taxes for the war effort?
i "Taxpayers should be required to vote for ... (
show quote)
Goodness, and you claim to be an educator?
Racmanaz wrote:
Goodness, and you claim to be an educator?
lol... Yes. I'm not a psychic. Please elaborate.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.