Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
An open letter to Admin
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Feb 23, 2024 11:32:40   #
Spirit Vision Photography Loc: Behind a Camera.
 
agillot wrote:
Can a frozen embryo ride in an HOV lane , Now we can change the subject .


Hmmm, I’ll look into that. 🤔

Reply
Feb 23, 2024 11:35:35   #
goldstar46 Loc: Tampa, Fl
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Some folks have a hard time accepting that this free-to-use website is not also free to be you and me

UHH owner "Admin" has made it clear that no nudity is allowed anywhere on UHH except the one section designed to display it. UHH owner "Admin" has made it clear that no politics are allowed in General Chit Chat. I couldn't find any specific reference to religious content, however.

Most volunteer-managed sections have guidelines relative to their specialty (such as Black and White not allowing color) and references to courtesy and constructive feedback. I didn't see the post being discussed here, and being a current manager of Digital Artistry and former manager of Post Processing Forum, I'm not going to second-guess the AI Creation manager's decision nor say what I "might" have done.

Admin has shown a willingness to create new sections when someone steps forward to volunteer to manage - hence, our 50+ forums to date So, a new "AI Artistry and Photography - all religions welcomed" might be a possibility.

Bottom line is UHH is a private entity. We are guests.
Some folks have a hard time accepting that this b... (show quote)

==============================================




Cheers
Goldstar46
George Veazey

Reply
Feb 23, 2024 11:52:45   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
...
...
Bottom line is UHH is a private entity. We are guests.

Bingo!

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2024 11:54:46   #
NateB
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Some folks have a hard time accepting that this free-to-use website is not also free to be you and me

UHH owner "Admin" has made it clear that no nudity is allowed anywhere on UHH except the one section designed to display it. UHH owner "Admin" has made it clear that no politics are allowed in General Chit Chat. I couldn't find any specific reference to religious content, however.

Most volunteer-managed sections have guidelines relative to their specialty (such as Black and White not allowing color) and references to courtesy and constructive feedback. I didn't see the post being discussed here, and being a current manager of Digital Artistry and former manager of Post Processing Forum, I'm not going to second-guess the AI Creation manager's decision nor say what I "might" have done.

Admin has shown a willingness to create new sections when someone steps forward to volunteer to manage - hence, our 50+ forums to date So, a new "AI Artistry and Photography - all religions welcomed" might be a possibility.

Bottom line is UHH is a private entity. We are guests.
Some folks have a hard time accepting that this b... (show quote)


👍👍

Reply
Feb 23, 2024 16:42:12   #
flathead27ford Loc: Colorado, North of Greeley
 
terryMc wrote:
While I personally have no religious beliefs or affiliation, neither do I have a problem with religious imagery as long as there is no discrimination and anyone can post their pictures freely. I happen to like to photograph churches, temples, and other places of worship, and do so at every opportunity, mostly because of the artwork and architecture which is often stunning. But I think to be fair, if you ban some, you must ban it all. Likewise, if you allow some, you must allow it all.



Reply
Feb 24, 2024 12:35:43   #
chasgroh Loc: Buena Park, CA
 
tommystrat wrote:
Clearly you have not visited the Christian Photography section in a long time. Even a brief look would show categorically that the posts there are affirming, positive, and express a love and longing for Jesus - exactly what the section was intended to present. There has not been one hateful, accusatory or hostile posting in well over a year (which is as far back as I looked) there. But I suppose that nowadays the issue of a Christian's faith is cause for immediate rejection, fear and hatred, as is so clearly expressed in your narrow post.
Clearly you have not visited the Christian Photogr... (show quote)


Dunno if it's "fear and hatred" but "stay off my lawn" seems appropriate! ;0)

Reply
Feb 24, 2024 12:39:20   #
chasgroh Loc: Buena Park, CA
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Some folks have a hard time accepting that this free-to-use website is not also free to be you and me

UHH owner "Admin" has made it clear that no nudity is allowed anywhere on UHH except the one section designed to display it. UHH owner "Admin" has made it clear that no politics are allowed in General Chit Chat. I couldn't find any specific reference to religious content, however.

Most volunteer-managed sections have guidelines relative to their specialty (such as Black and White not allowing color) and references to courtesy and constructive feedback. I didn't see the post being discussed here, and being a current manager of Digital Artistry and former manager of Post Processing Forum, I'm not going to second-guess the AI Creation manager's decision nor say what I "might" have done.

Admin has shown a willingness to create new sections when someone steps forward to volunteer to manage - hence, our 50+ forums to date So, a new "AI Artistry and Photography - all religions welcomed" might be a possibility.

Bottom line is UHH is a private entity. We are guests.
Some folks have a hard time accepting that this b... (show quote)


Yes Ma'am! (Salute!).

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2024 14:48:07   #
terryMc Loc: Arizona's White Mountains
 
tommystrat wrote:
But I suppose that nowadays the issue of a Christian's faith is cause for immediate rejection, fear and hatred, as is so clearly expressed in your narrow post.

"Hartford Institute estimates there are roughly 350,000 religious congregations in the United States. This estimate relies on the RCMS 2010 religious congregations census. Of those, about 314,000 are Protestant and other Christian churches, and 24,000 are Catholic and Orthodox churches." From Google Search

I don't often participate in discussions like this for this very reason—characterizing any disagreement with today's Christian Nationalists as persecution, hatred, and fear is a very old tactic. Just as rushing to the side of the billionaires who own everything and have incalculable wealth and power and claiming they are victims because a large portion of the populace believes they should pay more in taxes, so is claiming that the largest faction of the religious population is being discriminated against, hated, persecuted and worse disingenuous (to be kind) inasmuch as their beliefs already dominate the culture in our society. We have Christian prayers before public events and meetings, Christian holy days are celebrated as national holidays, no one who calls himself a church is liable for taxes. ("Taxation without representation" has always been a big deal in the U.S. Well, what about representation without taxation? Churches seek an outsized say in government but refuse to pay the price of admission.)

I don't hate anyone. You can define fear in many ways, but basically, while I don't fear any religious belief, I do worry about the blatantly obvious attempts to install a Christian theocracy in the U.S. which would then mean rule by Biblical law. I worry because of the vast number of interpretations of what that kind of law would mean. We can see what it means to the Islamists who rule in various Middle Eastern countries, and it seems that while the Islamists themselves are not idealized, their form government based on their view of God's law is highly regarded.

You can argue that Islamic law is barbaric and not at all like what a Christian government would be, but they are both Abrahamic religions with a basis in the God of the Old Testament. Government rule based on the "teachings" of Jesus, who could easily be called a socialist or humanist, would never fly with today's fundamentalists who are all about denying the things that Jesus said should be freely given.

Reply
Feb 24, 2024 17:54:55   #
srg
 
terryMc wrote:
"Hartford Institute estimates there are roughly 350,000 religious congregations in the United States. This estimate relies on the RCMS 2010 religious congregations census. Of those, about 314,000 are Protestant and other Christian churches, and 24,000 are Catholic and Orthodox churches." From Google Search

I don't often participate in discussions like this for this very reason—characterizing any disagreement with today's Christian Nationalists as persecution, hatred, and fear is a very old tactic. Just as rushing to the side of the billionaires who own everything and have incalculable wealth and power and claiming they are victims because a large portion of the populace believes they should pay more in taxes, so is claiming that the largest faction of the religious population is being discriminated against, hated, persecuted and worse disingenuous (to be kind) inasmuch as their beliefs already dominate the culture in our society. We have Christian prayers before public events and meetings, Christian holy days are celebrated as national holidays, no one who calls himself a church is liable for taxes. ("Taxation without representation" has always been a big deal in the U.S. Well, what about representation without taxation? Churches seek an outsized say in government but refuse to pay the price of admission.)

I don't hate anyone. You can define fear in many ways, but basically, while I don't fear any religious belief, I do worry about the blatantly obvious attempts to install a Christian theocracy in the U.S. which would then mean rule by Biblical law. I worry because of the vast number of interpretations of what that kind of law would mean. We can see what it means to the Islamists who rule in various Middle Eastern countries, and it seems that while the Islamists themselves are not idealized, their form government based on their view of God's law is highly regarded.

You can argue that Islamic law is barbaric and not at all like what a Christian government would be, but they are both Abrahamic religions with a basis in the God of the Old Testament. Government rule based on the "teachings" of Jesus, who could easily be called a socialist or humanist, would never fly with today's fundamentalists who are all about denying the things that Jesus said should be freely given.
"Hartford Institute estimates there are rough... (show quote)


My personal rule is, if they demand a specific headgear, I want nothing to do with them. That includes red Maga hats.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.