Looking for a landscape tripod.
Feb 10, 2024 07:10:18 #
Feb 10, 2024 09:24:29 #
Sidwalkastronomy
Loc: New Jersey Shore
streetmarty wrote:
Hello all, I’ve been a photographer for 60 years. ... (show quote)
I have a few sirui carbon tripods. I'm very happy with them. I have a gamble head on one
Feb 10, 2024 09:27:05 #
Marty
As already suggested, check several models out at a real store and see if you find a model that will allow you to "stand tall" while looking through your viewfinder.
Also consider a carbon fiber version. You'll find a pound will make a difference will carrying it around.
Good luck.
As already suggested, check several models out at a real store and see if you find a model that will allow you to "stand tall" while looking through your viewfinder.
Also consider a carbon fiber version. You'll find a pound will make a difference will carrying it around.
Good luck.
Feb 10, 2024 11:11:13 #
To be comfortable for landscape you need a tripod that is steady when the eyepiece is at about 68". Most tripods are not steady when the center column is raised. Look on the web for how to choose a tripod. I am about 69" tall and the no longer manufactured Promaster XC528C with 3 extensions works well has a ball head and can be carried in a pack pack; but I need to bend other to use it. there seem to be few tall tripods
Feb 10, 2024 11:16:17 #
Feb 10, 2024 11:16:58 #
home brewer wrote:
To be comfortable for landscape you need a tripod that is steady when the eyepiece is at about 68". Most tripods are not steady when the center column is raised. Look on the web for how to choose a tripod. I am about 69" tall and the no longer manufactured Promaster XC528C with 3 extensions works well has a ball head and can be carried in a pack pack; but I need to bend other to use it. there seem to be few tall tripods
AGREE .....You have to pay up for height ! A centerpost is much cheaper than having all three legs giving height and, IMO, a centerpost can be OK if you do not need absolute GREAT stability - OR - have a relatively small/lightweight camera/lens and NOT 500/600 f4's !
Feb 10, 2024 11:40:00 #
streetmarty wrote:
Hello all, I’ve been a photographer for 60 years.
I've had my eye on this one but have not yet purchased it.
https://www.amazon.com/Carbon-Tripod-ARTCISE-Camera-10-Layer/dp/B0C2PKV6VQ/ref=pd_ybh_a_sccl_34/142-7024596-9827458?pd_rd_w=wyHLu&content-id=amzn1.sym.67f8cf21-ade4-4299-b433-69e404eeecf1&pf_rd_p=67f8cf21-ade4-4299-b433-69e404eeecf1&pf_rd_r=GRX54CHZRG7QKGCHCBP4&pd_rd_wg=uY6gI&pd_rd_r=fcb3c304-445f-4d9d-867e-4a98cebb32cd&pd_rd_i=B0C2PKV6VQ&th=1
I am budget sensitive and this seems to have what I need at a reasonable price. It does not include a ballhead but I have one I could use on it. The cost of the ballhead (or other camera mount) can be significant. So you need to include that in your $400 cost limit. I have a really good travel tripod (peak design) but in some instances it is susceptible to vibrations in the wind when doing landscape. It is good to avoid the center column for height as it also makes the tripod less stable.
Feb 10, 2024 12:05:55 #
daledo wrote:
I've had my eye on this one but have not yet purch... (show quote)
I have this tripod and love it.
The upside, is that it's a real price performer.
Downsides -- Although it's steady, I can tell the difference between this and my friend's RRS (given the price difference, no surprise).
The Bowl size is non-standard, which isn't a problem, unless you're looking to expand.
Nice thing about it, they've changed the design since I bought it, so there's now a hook to hang a bag (if you don't want to use the stone bag.
It does fit in my Camera Bag, but not in my smaller backpack, but I knew that when I bought it.
Feb 10, 2024 12:11:29 #
lmTrying
Loc: WV Northern Panhandle
bsprague wrote:
What is it that you like about it? The marketing ... (show quote)
I'm curious. What is it about leg flip locks that you do not like. I have two that have twist locks that I find to be time consuming and annoying.
Feb 10, 2024 12:11:40 #
Feb 10, 2024 12:34:02 #
daledo wrote:
I've had my eye on this one but have not yet purchased it.
That one looks interesting. Very simple. But it weighed more (6.29 lbs) that I expected considering that it was carbon fiber without a ball head and no real center column. I wonder if that included the rock sling and the smartphone mount.
Feb 10, 2024 12:58:02 #
I’ve owned lots of tripods from big wooden ones for view cameras , to manfrotto, to giro carbon fiber. As I got older I decided to try something a bit lighter. I bought the Sirius waterproof which may be one model up from what you describe . I have been Very impressed with every aspect. It even has a detachable leg to monopod that gives up no stability. It is now my most used tripod.
Feb 10, 2024 13:09:26 #
You might want to check this one out: https://www.amazon.com/Feisol-Classic-CT-3401-4-Section-Carbon/dp/B005DNTAN2/ref=sr_1_18?crid=21SLB906OBGC9&keywords=feisal+tripod&qid=1707587975&sprefix=feisol+tripod%2Caps%2C401&sr=8-18
I have a Feisol CT-3442 (which appears to be discontinued). Very light weight to carry, but very strong & easy to use. I've had mine for several years & it works well. I use a fluid head by Manfrotto (MVH500AH) on it.
I have a Feisol CT-3442 (which appears to be discontinued). Very light weight to carry, but very strong & easy to use. I've had mine for several years & it works well. I use a fluid head by Manfrotto (MVH500AH) on it.
Feb 10, 2024 13:58:21 #
Feb 10, 2024 14:36:27 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.