Texcaster wrote:
Talk's cheap. Get Her In Court! LOCK HER UP!
Sorry you already tried that and it didn't go well did it? The "Dog Ate The Evidence Again'' excuse.
No it wasn't the dog unless you consider the weaponized corrupt FBI and DOJ as attack dogs for the Democratic Socialist Party. Of course that fact is becoming quite evident in American politics as the Left goes after political opponents as does a Communist country.
Your corrupt clown talk has no value at all, just a blowhard releasing gas.
Dennis
scooter1 wrote:
The fact is the democrats own the DOJ. Just the fact that Hiliary got away with deleting everything that was required by a judge and she paid nothing monetarily or otherwise. She broke so many laws while running, by the "Russia collusion" and other sly things yet here she walks free. You do know about these things right?
So why hasn't a prosecutor ever taken her before a judge? All ... conspiracy theories/NO evidence ... usually knocks these swiftboat-quests on the head before ever going to trial.
Here's an oldie but a goodie. (the new hats say ... "But His Boxes")
Texcaster wrote:
So why hasn't a prosecutor ever taken her before a judge? All ... conspiracy theories/NO evidence ... usually knocks these swiftboat-quests on the head before ever going to trial.
Here's an oldie but a goodie. (the new hats say ... "But His Boxes")
You're just not paying attention are you. Yes she was in fact found to have deleted 30K emails, smashed computers and cell phones. If anyone here did that we would be in prison.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
dennis2146 wrote:
Of course I AM bright enough to correctly spell the word whillikers. It seems, actually it IS, you who is not bright enough to spell the word. Now that isn't my lying but more like you just aren't too bright. That is the truth. Thanks for proving it to us right here this morning.
You might find these facts more interesting about the word, Whillikers, in American English, informal, (used as an intensive after gee or golly gee to express astonishment, delight, etc.
Consider little krackhead, golly gee whillikers I am completely astonished you are not bright enough to spell the word, whillikers properly.
Dennis
Of course I AM bright enough to correctly spell th... (
show quote)
But Grammer Cop Dennis is not bright enough to include the closing parentheses in his rant!
Love those gotchas!!!
scooter1 wrote:
You're just not paying attention are you. Yes she was in fact found to have deleted 30K emails, smashed computers and cell phones. If anyone here did that we would be in prison.
You poor MAGA sap, you'll go to the grave believing everything the Central Park Rapist whispers in your ear. You parrot every utterance of 5th Ave Johnny as if direct words from God. I'll repeat ... "So Lock Her Up Genius!"
Fact check: Trump’s self-serving comparison to Hillary Clinton’s classified email scandal
Marshall Cohen Updated June 20, 2023
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/14/politics/fact-check-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-classified-documents/index.html Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly and inaccurately compared his federal indictment to the Hillary Clinton email investigation that ended without charges, claiming unfair treatment.
Facts First: This is an inaccurate and self-serving comparison. To be sure, investigators found problems with how both Trump and Clinton handled classified material, and they both misled the public about their conduct. But there are several major differences that break in Clinton’s favor. Trump mishandled far more classified material. And prosecutors have presented evidence that he knowingly broke the law and obstructed the investigation, while the FBI concluded that Clinton didn’t act with criminal intent.
On Tuesday night, Trump baselessly claimed that “Hillary Clinton broke the law, and she didn’t get indicted” because “the FBI and Justice Department protected her.” But an exhaustive 2018 report from the Justice Department inspector general concluded that investigators made the right call by not charging Clinton, and that their decision-making wasn’t motivated by political bias.
Trump also claimed Clinton had a “deliberate intention” of violating records retention laws when she used a private email server to conduct government business as secretary of state. He also said “there has never been obstruction as grave” as what Clinton did to impede the FBI probe into her emails. Both of Trump’s assertions here are belied by the FBI’s conclusions in the case.
JohnFrim wrote:
But Grammer Cop Dennis is not bright enough to include the closing parentheses in his rant!
Love those gotchas!!!
Holy Shit John. Is that the best you can do?
Oh! Please point out exactly where you think I should have used parentheses. You did notice I used commas didn’t you.
You are also aware when I perform my duties as a grammar cop I STILL answer questions and/or post to the member writing.
But you ONLY point out a grammar error that I disagree with.
Post away John. Like most of the Left Wingers here you come across as an ASS.
Dennis
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
dennis2146 wrote:
Please point out exactly where you think I should have used parentheses.
Seriously? You have to ask? Some (incompetent) Grammar Cop you are!!!
dennis2146 wrote:
Post away John. Like most of the Left Wingers here you come across as an ASS.
Dennis
Ask away, Dennis. Like a few of the Right Wingers here you just came across as an ASS... AGAIN!!!
Texcaster wrote:
You poor MAGA sap, you'll go to the grave believing everything the Central Park Rapist whispers in your ear. You parrot every utterance of 5th Ave Johnny as if direct words from God. I'll repeat ... "So Lock Her Up Genius!"
Fact check: Trump’s self-serving comparison to Hillary Clinton’s classified email scandal
Marshall Cohen Updated June 20, 2023
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/14/politics/fact-check-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-classified-documents/index.html Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly and inaccurately compared his federal indictment to the Hillary Clinton email investigation that ended without charges, claiming unfair treatment.
Facts First: This is an inaccurate and self-serving comparison. To be sure, investigators found problems with how both Trump and Clinton handled classified material, and they both misled the public about their conduct. But there are several major differences that break in Clinton’s favor. Trump mishandled far more classified material. And prosecutors have presented evidence that he knowingly broke the law and obstructed the investigation, while the FBI concluded that Clinton didn’t act with criminal intent.
On Tuesday night, Trump baselessly claimed that “Hillary Clinton broke the law, and she didn’t get indicted” because “the FBI and Justice Department protected her.” But an exhaustive 2018 report from the Justice Department inspector general concluded that investigators made the right call by not charging Clinton, and that their decision-making wasn’t motivated by political bias.
Trump also claimed Clinton had a “deliberate intention” of violating records retention laws when she used a private email server to conduct government business as secretary of state. He also said “there has never been obstruction as grave” as what Clinton did to impede the FBI probe into her emails. Both of Trump’s assertions here are belied by the FBI’s conclusions in the case.
You poor MAGA sap, you'll go to the grave believin... (
show quote)
This from a Rachael Madcow wannabe
JohnFrim wrote:
Ask away, Dennis. Like a few of the Right Wingers here you just came across as an ASS... AGAIN!!!
John I asked only because you brought it up but were specific about what you think deserves parenthesis marks.
Apparently you still haven't any idea as you still have not pointed out exactly what it is you mean though I DID ASK and you haven't answered. I did look at my post and am satisfied it is just fine. If you are not able to exactly point out your niggling problem with it then I can only tell you to suck an egg. How easy for you on the Left to run your mouths but with nothing to back up your crying and bitching.
An ASS you call me but only because you are unable to back up your statement. Now isn't that just like a whining crying bitching little Left Winger. Pretty pathetic.
Dennis
Texcaster wrote:
You poor MAGA sap, you'll go to the grave believing everything the Central Park Rapist whispers in your ear. You parrot every utterance of 5th Ave Johnny as if direct words from God. I'll repeat ... "So Lock Her Up Genius!"
Fact check: Trump’s self-serving comparison to Hillary Clinton’s classified email scandal
Marshall Cohen Updated June 20, 2023
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/14/politics/fact-check-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-classified-documents/index.html Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly and inaccurately compared his federal indictment to the Hillary Clinton email investigation that ended without charges, claiming unfair treatment.
Facts First: This is an inaccurate and self-serving comparison. To be sure, investigators found problems with how both Trump and Clinton handled classified material, and they both misled the public about their conduct. But there are several major differences that break in Clinton’s favor. Trump mishandled far more classified material. And prosecutors have presented evidence that he knowingly broke the law and obstructed the investigation, while the FBI concluded that Clinton didn’t act with criminal intent.
On Tuesday night, Trump baselessly claimed that “Hillary Clinton broke the law, and she didn’t get indicted” because “the FBI and Justice Department protected her.” But an exhaustive 2018 report from the Justice Department inspector general concluded that investigators made the right call by not charging Clinton, and that their decision-making wasn’t motivated by political bias.
Trump also claimed Clinton had a “deliberate intention” of violating records retention laws when she used a private email server to conduct government business as secretary of state. He also said “there has never been obstruction as grave” as what Clinton did to impede the FBI probe into her emails. Both of Trump’s assertions here are belied by the FBI’s conclusions in the case.
You poor MAGA sap, you'll go to the grave believin... (
show quote)
We, in an attempt to get the news right find that CNN is completely left leaning and their so called facts are actually their own little opinions thereby rendering them false. For those of you in the Biden cult it makes sense you would also belong to the Hillary cult. Two cults max for you.
scooter1 wrote:
We, in an attempt to get the news right find that CNN is completely left leaning and their so called facts are actually their own little opinions thereby rendering them false. For those of you in the Biden cult it makes sense you would also belong to the Hillary cult. Two cults max for you.
Doesn't it just remind you of Fox News?
Texcaster wrote:
You poor MAGA sap, you'll go to the grave believing everything the Central Park Rapist whispers in your ear. You parrot every utterance of 5th Ave Johnny as if direct words from God. I'll repeat ... "So Lock Her Up Genius!"
Fact check: Trump’s self-serving comparison to Hillary Clinton’s classified email scandal
Marshall Cohen Updated June 20, 2023
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/14/politics/fact-check-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-classified-documents/index.html Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly and inaccurately compared his federal indictment to the Hillary Clinton email investigation that ended without charges, claiming unfair treatment.
Facts First: This is an inaccurate and self-serving comparison. To be sure, investigators found problems with how both Trump and Clinton handled classified material, and they both misled the public about their conduct. But there are several major differences that break in Clinton’s favor. Trump mishandled far more classified material. And prosecutors have presented evidence that he knowingly broke the law and obstructed the investigation, while the FBI concluded that Clinton didn’t act with criminal intent.
On Tuesday night, Trump baselessly claimed that “Hillary Clinton broke the law, and she didn’t get indicted” because “the FBI and Justice Department protected her.” But an exhaustive 2018 report from the Justice Department inspector general concluded that investigators made the right call by not charging Clinton, and that their decision-making wasn’t motivated by political bias.
Trump also claimed Clinton had a “deliberate intention” of violating records retention laws when she used a private email server to conduct government business as secretary of state. He also said “there has never been obstruction as grave” as what Clinton did to impede the FBI probe into her emails. Both of Trump’s assertions here are belied by the FBI’s conclusions in the case.
You poor MAGA sap, you'll go to the grave believin... (
show quote)
Holy SHIT!!!!! Look at your pathetic reply. How telling it is the FBI found nothing wrong with Hillary after an investigation. Now WTH would you expect a corrupt government agency that is protecting the higher ups from the Left to say. No surprise you and your cult members believe the FBI hook line and sinker.
A judge ordered Clinton NOT to destroy the documents. We call that a Court ORDER. They don’t usually get ignored by the rest of us but in Hillary’s case she generally GETS to tell judges to Fk themselves. Didn’t something similar happen in the Rose Law Firm documents that were lost but were miraculously found in plain sight on a hall table the day before her time to produce them was up? You and the rest of your lying corrupt cult have this dumb ass habit of believing every word from the mouths of Left Wing politicians known for years to be corrupt. It shows BIGLY.
Congratulations Your pathetic sorry post proves you are a CLOWN and a FOOL.
Dennis
Kraken wrote:
Doesn't it just remind you of Fox News?
Reminds the rest of us of YOU playing the FOOL.
Dennis
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
dennis2146 wrote:
John I asked only because you brought it up but were specific about what you think deserves parenthesis marks.
Apparently you still haven't any idea as you still have not pointed out exactly what it is you mean though I DID ASK and you haven't answered. I did look at my post and am satisfied it is just fine. If you are not able to exactly point out your niggling problem with it then I can only tell you to suck an egg. How easy for you on the Left to run your mouths but with nothing to back up your crying and bitching.
An ASS you call me but only because you are unable to back up your statement. Now isn't that just like a whining crying bitching little Left Winger. Pretty pathetic.
Dennis
John I asked only because you brought it up but we... (
show quote)
Been offline for awhile, but back now to answer your question.
In your post where you play spell checker you claim you are bright enough to catch a spelling mistake. I said you are a poor grammar cop because you did not close your parenthetical expression. You need a closing parentheses in your post to make it grammatically correct. If you are going to correct people you should at least not have mistakes in your correction.
Now, go back and see what I first posted to you and you will see that I told you that right away.
The ASS reference was simply me taking YOUR words of calling me an ASS and turning them around.
So... you DID leave off the closing parentheses, I caught you at it (GOTCHA!!), and twice you STILL did not understand your error. Yet you called me an ASS and said I could not defend my statements.
Sometimes you are very hard to understand!!! But we are still friends, right?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.