Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
Is Sony A9 still worth buying in 2024?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Feb 8, 2024 21:50:40   #
Gabyto
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
He mentioned already owning Canon's final and finest 5D-series DSLR, so EF lenses are assumed also. No one trying to be helpful would see this situation and then suggest giving up on this pro-grade equipment to chase better results with another brand. Being helpful is to be helpful, not foolishly encouraging a failed strategy.



Reply
Feb 8, 2024 21:51:05   #
Gabyto
 
gwilliams6 wrote:
He asked for comments from full time Sony users, not Canon fanboy/Sony haters like you. LOL.LOL



Reply
Feb 8, 2024 21:51:25   #
Gabyto
 
UTMike wrote:
I have the old A9 and it is still my go to body for action shots. Great ability to hold or gain focus.



Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2024 21:52:20   #
Gabyto
 
ORpilot wrote:
I moved from the a7iii and a7Riv to the a9 because of the focus speed. The a9 and ii and iii are fast with different bells and whistles . I missed the resolution of the a7Riv so I now also have the A1 . The A9 is my back up but it is also my primary star photography and low light photography camera. The A9 has less noise at higher ISO. Is the a9 still viable ....Yes. The a7iii is fast but not as fast as the A9. But what about the a7iv. A used a9 is less $$$ than a new a7iv. If you shoot birds, animals, and sports, the A9 series is the way to go.
I moved from the a7iii and a7Riv to the a9 because... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 8, 2024 21:52:41   #
Gabyto
 
azted wrote:
I shoot with a Sony A7iv and a Sony A7Rlll is my backup. Your question about the A9 has to be in relation to the type of shooting you do. Many of the event shooters who I work with went to the A9 line for the speed of focus. I waited for the A7iv, because I was shooting with an A7lll, and I wanted the better focusing system and processor on the A7iv. But some Sony engineers told me that the A9ll can be upgraded to almost the equivalent of the A1, except of course it does not have a 51mp sensor. So it depends upon what your style is as to which model I would recommend.
I shoot with a Sony A7iv and a Sony A7Rlll is my b... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 8, 2024 21:53:08   #
Gabyto
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Canon limited? What??

Via the EF to RF adapter, the largest catalog in the history of photography is adaptable, as well as numerous other SLR-style lenses from multiple non-Canon mounts. Even Canon's own legacy FD lenses can leverage the marvels of digital mirrorless technology.

Moreover, Canon is pumping out an RF catalog as fast as the designs can be completed, tested and patented. Granted, there's a price-premium for 'new' and 'best', something you see in all three major players.

If you think changing systems will make you a better photographer, well ... that's the UHH community in a nutshell. Hopefully, you can see the foolishness of this all too common sentiment.
Canon limited? What?? br br Via the EF to RF adap... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 9, 2024 06:49:31   #
whfowle Loc: Tampa first, now Albuquerque
 
It looks like the camera wars are in full tilt. Every camera will shoot great pictures if the guy or gal behind the camera does his or her part. I've used at one time or another nearly every camera brand, both film and digital. I have a few great pictures from each of them and thousands of bad pictures from all of them. My advice is just get out and practice a lot if you want more great pictures.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2024 06:51:38   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Gabyto wrote:
I am wondering if this camera is still worth buying since Sony had already introduced so many new cameras. Any information from the hard-core Sony members will be greatly appreciated. I am thinking of moving to the Sony eco system since the lens offerings is unlimited. I used to shoot with Canon 5Div BIF, but I know the RF lenses are extremely expensive. I am aware of the R cameras, but the main issue is the lenses is very limited. Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thank you all that share their knowledge.
I am wondering if this camera is still worth buyin... (show quote)


I still shoot my a9, there is basically only cosmetic differences between an a9 and a9II, both share the same guts.
I also shoot the a1. The a9 does not have the eye focus of the a1 for birds but still I get almost a 99% keep rate on birds in flight with the a9. I like the vertical grip to make the camera larger for my hands, especially with longer lenes.
I notice hardly no difference in focusing speeds between my a1 and a9, they are both very fast. The a9 does not have a shutter like the one on the a1 when turning the camera off. So be careful changing lenses outside as your sensor is exposed on the a9.
Again, I still shoot wildlife with my a9, I find it still very relevant in the field. It would be a big bucks savings from the a1.
I will be selling one of my three a9's in May 2024. I will list it here first, I have the vertical grip for it and all boxes.

Reply
Feb 9, 2024 07:58:06   #
jbk224 Loc: Long Island, NY
 
gwilliams6 wrote:
He asked for comments from full time Sony users, not Canon fanboy/Sony haters like you. LOL.LOL


CHG_Canon, while not a Sony user, was certainly not precluded from answering since the OP also discussed part of their conundrum with Canon products. Well thought out and his final thought was relevant regardless of what one shoots.
Clearly you have no problem in answering any question since you have owned and are an expert in just about all major camera manufacturers. In fact, one can only be impressed with your stable of equipment..especially since you never let anyone forget.
And let us not forget that all of these professional organizations that use certain manufacturers, such as Sony, mean that all of us ignorant enthusiasts who choose to use anything else...are ignorant!
Thank you sincerely for pointing this out.
LoL, LoL, Cheers

Reply
Feb 9, 2024 08:38:22   #
keywest305 Loc: Baltimore Md.
 
Sony Canon Sony Canon, just buy Nikon Z and be done with all your problems. Haa just kidding. A little fuel for the fire

Reply
Feb 9, 2024 08:43:07   #
Nalu Loc: Southern Arizona
 
Should you elect to go with the a9, I have one that I would be willing to sell. It is in good shape but has a very small "burn" on the monitor (off to the side) that was caused by leaving it in the sun in my car too long. It has no impact on image quality. Also has a battery pack which IMO results in better balance with longer lenses. Other than the burn, the camera is in great shape. Send me a private message if you are interested and we can talk price and I can send pics. I was using a 5DIV for birds (and other things) before making the switch to the a9. The a9 ran circles around the 5DIV and since (having upgraded to the a1 and a7Riv) have never looked back nor considered ANYTHING but Sony. Good luck in your quest.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2024 08:52:45   #
Nalu Loc: Southern Arizona
 
PS: A Sony a9 combined with a 200-600 would be a great way to enter the Sony world at a very reasonable price.

Reply
Feb 9, 2024 08:53:24   #
Gabyto
 
billnikon wrote:
I still shoot my a9, there is basically only cosmetic differences between an a9 and a9II, both share the same guts.
I also shoot the a1. The a9 does not have the eye focus of the a1 for birds but still I get almost a 99% keep rate on birds in flight with the a9. I like the vertical grip to make the camera larger for my hands, especially with longer lenes.
I notice hardly no difference in focusing speeds between my a1 and a9, they are both very fast. The a9 does not have a shutter like the one on the a1 when turning the camera off. So be careful changing lenses outside as your sensor is exposed on the a9.
Again, I still shoot wildlife with my a9, I find it still very relevant in the field. It would be a big bucks savings from the a1.
I will be selling one of my three a9's in May 2024. I will list it here first, I have the vertical grip for it and all boxes.
I still shoot my a9, there is basically only cosme... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 9, 2024 08:54:57   #
Gabyto
 
jbk224 wrote:
CHG_Canon, while not a Sony user, was certainly not precluded from answering since the OP also discussed part of their conundrum with Canon products. Well thought out and his final thought was relevant regardless of what one shoots.
Clearly you have no problem in answering any question since you have owned and are an expert in just about all major camera manufacturers. In fact, one can only be impressed with your stable of equipment..especially since you never let anyone forget.
And let us not forget that all of these professional organizations that use certain manufacturers, such as Sony, mean that all of us ignorant enthusiasts who choose to use anything else...are ignorant!
Thank you sincerely for pointing this out.
LoL, LoL, Cheers
CHG_Canon, while not a Sony user, was certainly no... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 9, 2024 08:55:25   #
Gabyto
 
keywest305 wrote:
Sony Canon Sony Canon, just buy Nikon Z and be done with all your problems. Haa just kidding. A little fuel for the fire



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.