Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Banned
Jan 16, 2024 10:11:38 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Maybe he was allowed one topic before incarceration?
So, the rumors are true! Members who are banned will actually be incarcerated!
Jan 16, 2024 10:32:22 #
Juy wrote:
Just take it as a badge of honor,you spoke your mind in this do not divulge your opinion society.
You have no idea why he got banned but you know it was something to be proud of? 🤔
Jan 16, 2024 11:46:36 #
Juy
Loc: Delaware
srt101fan wrote:
You have no idea why he got banned but you know it was something to be proud of? 🤔
Joke ,dude lighten up, or do you just want a fight?
Looking over your post I would say the later.
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Jan 16, 2024 12:29:44 #
Juy wrote:
Joke ,dude lighten up, or do you just want a fight?
Looking over your post I would say the later.
Looking over your post I would say the later.
No, I don't want a fight....
Sorry if I misinterpreted your post. It's just frustrating to see people immediately come out in support of a banned individual when they have no idea what triggered Admin's action.
Admin has rules we have to abide by. Some people don't like that, claiming a right to free speech and accusing Admin of "censorship" - an absurd notion!
Some folks step over the line and receive a warning from Admin. They get banned from a section or the forum if they persist in their transgressions. If you can accuse Admin of anything, it might be that he doesn't have a lot of patience with UHH miscreants.
No, I'm not looking for a fight, just fair play...
Jan 16, 2024 13:02:02 #
Jan 16, 2024 13:13:14 #
Well - absolutely no clue as to how or why one could be banned from the attic. Pretty much anything goes there - other than explicit porn OR direct threats (name-calling and disparagement are routine). So unless SodaPop commited such an egregious act (AND was subsequently incarcerated) - just no way to tell. Typically in the banishment communication, the Admin will copy the offending part of the post (these are sent to your private messages folder).
Jan 16, 2024 13:22:54 #
jerryc41 wrote:
ROTFLSo, the rumors are true! Members who are banned will actually be incarcerated!
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Jan 16, 2024 13:51:19 #
Basil_O wrote:
That's the problem with written words. It's hard to convey subtle meaning without relying on eye roll emojis. No cupie doll, but you can select any prize from the bottom shelf.
Okay! I’ll take the Goldfish in the plastic bag. She winked at me!
Jan 16, 2024 14:24:10 #
Architect1776 wrote:
You were not PC enough and perhaps actually told the truth about an issue.
That is an immediate grounds for being banned.
That is an immediate grounds for being banned.
Bingo. We have a winner.
Jan 16, 2024 15:51:35 #
Not sure what it was you said or did but evidently you’ve stood in the corner long enough. Unlike the thought nazis at the leica forum who banish you permanently if you don’t conform to their stupid DEI mindset, UHH seems pretty well run.
Jan 16, 2024 18:51:10 #
Jan 16, 2024 20:28:17 #
srron wrote:
If there is no absolute truth then that statement isnt true.
Absolutely true...
Jan 16, 2024 20:35:41 #
neillaubenthal wrote:
Bingo. We have a winner.
I too was banned from the forum for a while. I ended up in The Attic.
I wasn’t very Politically Correct in my thread. I was telling the truth about something. I took my punishment and have had the lumps and bruises to prove it. Since I was new to the forum at that time, I PM’d the Admin. Now I keep my nose clean and most of my thoughts to myself.
As for the term “thought Nazis” please refrain for being insulting. Administrating a forum is a very grueling task!!
Jan 16, 2024 21:15:56 #
Scruples wrote:
Okay! I’ll take the Goldfish in the plastic bag. She winked at me!
You have chosen wisely. She was once a beautiful princess, but crossed a line and was banned from the castle. I found her in the attic.
Jan 16, 2024 21:37:40 #
Wyantry
Loc: SW Colorado
[quote=srron]
Good point!
Red6 wrote:
Therein lies the problem. Whose version of truth is correct?
There is no absolute truth, it is all in the perspective of the speaker or witness of the event.
If there is no absolute truth, then the statement that there is no absolute truth , isn't true.
There is no absolute truth, it is all in the perspective of the speaker or witness of the event.
If there is no absolute truth, then the statement that there is no absolute truth , isn't true.
Good point!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.