“Filtered” image from PS
Jan 12, 2024 15:26:31 #
Interesting. If that's what they mean, they are crazy to be so concerned about this photo. I have since resized it to their requirements (900 x 1500 pixels - 3 x 5 at 300dpi). This is going on a book jacket. Do they actually think the image detail will be so significant? Fear that it will kill their sales?? 🤪
Jan 12, 2024 15:31:20 #
Grahame wrote:
The term 'filtered' is commonly used these days to describe a picture that does not look natural.
I don't think the photo looks unnatural.
Jan 12, 2024 16:32:21 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
I don't think the photo looks unnatural.
The original does not look unnatural, just well out of focus, but the rendition screams 'doctored' to me.
Jan 12, 2024 17:14:08 #
Grahame wrote:
The original does not look unnatural, just well out of focus, but the rendition screams 'doctored' to me.
As you noticed from the trail of posts, the original did suck, and while the other is heavily doctored, it was the most one could achieve in a short time. Still, as noted in my original post, I didn’t understand why a PP image was not useable.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.