Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
“Filtered” image from PS
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jan 10, 2024 08:29:01   #
bkwaters
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
Then we can only speculate on what their objection was, or whether you're nuts.


Agree we need more info. Maybe the color profile?

Reply
Jan 10, 2024 10:43:37   #
GLSmith Loc: Tampa, Fl
 
Probably, they want to do their own PS or LightRoom per their standards

Reply
Jan 10, 2024 11:22:49   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
HRoss wrote:
I recently received a mobile phone headshot photo from a friend who was having a book published. I did some PP with PS and Topaz, created a jpg version and sent it back to my friend for submission to the publisher.

The publisher told her she needed an unadjusted image, because PS images have a “filter” that they can’t use.

Has anyone heard of this or can anyone provide an explanation?


Call the publisher direct and get the answer.

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2024 14:25:28   #
jackpinoh Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
 

Reply
Jan 10, 2024 15:03:02   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
jackpinoh wrote:


If you use Quote Reply, we would know who you are giving thumbs up to.

Reply
Jan 11, 2024 21:49:58   #
HRoss Loc: Longmont, CO
 
Since a number of you asked for the original and PP images, I thought it would be appropriate for you all to see the work.

Also, I do want to speak with the publisher, but it's not my book, so I'm waiting on my friends return to discuss calling them and getting their requirements. I do know they have certain size (pixel based) requierments, which are easy to adjust, but I do hope to get a better understanding of their other needs/wants.

Here are the 2 images.

Thanks for any further thoughts or input.

This was the original via cellphone and sent by text.
This was the original via cellphone and sent by te...
(Download)

After PP
After PP...
(Download)

Reply
Jan 11, 2024 22:08:50   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
HRoss wrote:
Since a number of you asked for the original and PP images, I thought it would be appropriate for you all to see the work.

Also, I do want to speak with the publisher, but it's not my book, so I'm waiting on my friends return to discuss calling them and getting their requirements. I do know they have certain size (pixel based) requierments, which are easy to adjust, but I do hope to get a better understanding of their other needs/wants.

Here are the 2 images.

Thanks for any further thoughts or input.
Since a number of you asked for the original and P... (show quote)


Obviously nothing radical has been done. It just looks a little better than the original. I would contact the publisher directly and ask what is the problem.

Reply
 
 
Jan 12, 2024 09:08:38   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
HRoss wrote:
Since a number of you asked for the original and PP images, I thought it would be appropriate for you all to see the work.

Also, I do want to speak with the publisher, but it's not my book, so I'm waiting on my friends return to discuss calling them and getting their requirements. I do know they have certain size (pixel based) requierments, which are easy to adjust, but I do hope to get a better understanding of their other needs/wants.

Here are the 2 images.

Thanks for any further thoughts or input.
Since a number of you asked for the original and P... (show quote)


As I said earlier, call the publisher and get it straight from the horses mouth you do not need your friends ok

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 09:41:25   #
HRoss Loc: Longmont, CO
 
frankraney wrote:
As I said earlier, call the publisher and get it straight from the horses mouth you do not need your friends ok


Frank, it’s my friends book, I have no idea who the publisher is, so I need the info from her. It is my intention to speak with them. Thanks.

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 11:19:06   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
It could be that's their polite way of saying that the photo isn't good enough to go on one of their books. It's not your editing that's at fault - it's the original phone camera photo.

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 11:22:30   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
R.G. wrote:
It could be that's their polite way of saying that the photo isn't good enough to go on one of their books. It's not your editing that's at fault - it's the original phone camera photo.


If that's the case, they should just say so and not make up some nonsense about it being "filtered".

Reply
 
 
Jan 12, 2024 11:23:07   #
HRoss Loc: Longmont, CO
 
R.G. wrote:
It could be that's their polite way of saying that the photo isn't good enough to go on one of their books. It's not your editing that's at fault - it's the original phone camera photo.


I’ve offered to take the actual photo for my friend, but she wanted it quickly and had her husband use his phone. It was a terrible shot all around. Perhaps she’ll rethink my offer.

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 11:42:31   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
HRoss wrote:
....Perhaps she’ll rethink my offer.


That could save a lot of embarrassment all round.

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 12:58:35   #
HRoss Loc: Longmont, CO
 
R.G. wrote:
That could save a lot of embarrassment all round.


For sure. Kind regards.

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 13:54:59   #
Grahame Loc: Fiji
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
If that's the case, they should just say so and not make up some nonsense about it being "filtered".

The term 'filtered' is commonly used these days to describe a picture that does not look natural.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.