Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Canon G5X Mk ii - Refurb vs Used vs new gray-market?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 7, 2024 21:31:01   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
Earl Grey wrote:
Perhaps I've given a wrong impression. I'm not "worrying" or fretting or hand-wringing or lip-biting. In my job, I'm in the habit of listing all the pros and cons I can think of to make sure I'm thinking logically. Just a habit of forcing myself to think through an issue, which has served me well.

I wasn't expecting a lecture. I had heard of refurbs that needed to be sent back, and I had the experience once of buying a tape deck that was a demo model, and it ended up with a worn out main bearing that was unrepairable. So I thought I should ask whether worn out AF gears were an issue. I have never purchased gray market and have had issues with used stuff on eBay -- so I wondered what more experienced folks have learned about this. I'm grateful for the help; I didn't expect to be scorned and lectured. Do you treat all newbies here like this?

Mainly, what I'm looking to do is address the frustrations I felt with my Canon S95. The G5X looks really good to me.

Thanks.
Perhaps I've given a wrong impression. I'm not &q... (show quote)


These are valid thoughts, as borne out by my personal experiences. As far as I can tell, there is no real legal standard for what constitutes a "refurbished" item. For a number of years, i "refurbished" older two-way radio sets. That involved cleaning them, repairing them, usually by swapping parts from donor units, and evev doing some repainting with textured spray paint. I was not doing this for resale. It was just the only financially feasible way that I had to add operating examples of older models to my collection.

While refurbisment of camera equipment depends mightily on who is doing the refurbishing, "factory" refurbs generally consist of a quick cleaning and repacking into boxes that provide some protection while distinguishing the products from new ones. The problems generally arise when a return product damaged by a customer gets mixed in with demos and ordinary undamaged returns. Why would that happen? If you bought a new lens and dropped it, would you rather be honest about what happened and have it repaired or take it back to the store with a complaint of "never worked properly right out of the box?" Thats why most people buy refurbs with never a complaint, but a few of us have had very negative experiences. (Fortunately, my lens was rather quickly "made right" by the manufacturer, but it was not replaced.)

I have also had two cameras of different models which were bought new from the same retailer at slightly different times. Both suffered serious operational failures during their warranty period. The exchange period for each was past, so they had to go for repair. Those repairs were pretty serious, involving replacement of the main circuit board and a second (different) circuit board in each camera. I will always believe that those cameras were part of a damaged shipment...perhaps the same one. Either a truck accident, a train derailment, or who knows what?

That's why I said earlier that there is always some risk involved with a purchase, no matter where from. And no number of choruses of "I've never had a problem," or "I've never had to file a warranty claim remove that risk. You just have to understand it and be ready to respond if circumstances require it.

Finally...I still have and occasionally shoot my original digital SLR, bought in 2006. I like it, it is important to me, and I like to use it once in a while. (I've finally found homes for several other older cameras which still work just fine.) So I understand having an attachment to a camera that is no longer "current." But the photo equipment world is changing. Rapidly and radically. Its going to be getting harder and harder to maintain old stuff in operating condition. So there is some merit to some of the advice which has been given to you.

Just be aware and be prepared to be flexible.

Reply
Jan 8, 2024 00:36:46   #
Laramie Loc: Tempe
 
KEH has a G5 X II and a G1 X III. the G1 has an APS-C sensor.

Reply
Jan 8, 2024 06:37:14   #
BebuLamar
 
Earl Grey wrote:
Thanks. My goal was to get a "pocket sized" camera to slim down my overhead bin requirements on airplanes, since I also travel with a musical instrument.

I would like a faster lens and more zoom than my old Canon S95. Everything now has more resolution and is more advanced than the S95, but I don't really care.

Some comparisons:

My Canon S95: 1/1.7 inch sensor, 28 - 105mm eq zoom, f2.0 to f4.9

Canon G7X Mark iii: 1.0 inch sensor, 24 - 100mm zoom, f1.8 - f2.8 -- brighter but I would like more zoom.

Canon G5X Mark ii: 1.0 inch sensor, 24 - 120mm zoom, f1.8 - f2.8 -- brighter and more zoom.

Sony RX100 Mark vii: more than I want to spend, at $1300. More zoom than I need (200mm eq), but at f/2.8 - f4.5 -- not as bright.

So I think I will probably be happiest picking up a refurb G5X, or maybe even a gray market one and hope for the best. I'm just looking to educate myself on alternatives and potential gotchas.

Thanks!
Thanks. My goal was to get a "pocket sized&q... (show quote)


is the refurbished more or less expensive than gray market one? Does the gray market one has return period?

Reply
 
 
Jan 8, 2024 10:09:21   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Earl Grey wrote:
Thanks. My goal was to get a "pocket sized" camera to slim down my overhead bin requirements on airplanes, since I also travel with a musical instrument.

I would like a faster lens and more zoom than my old Canon S95. Everything now has more resolution and is more advanced than the S95, but I don't really care.

Some comparisons:

My Canon S95: 1/1.7 inch sensor, 28 - 105mm eq zoom, f2.0 to f4.9

Canon G7X Mark iii: 1.0 inch sensor, 24 - 100mm zoom, f1.8 - f2.8 -- brighter but I would like more zoom.

Canon G5X Mark ii: 1.0 inch sensor, 24 - 120mm zoom, f1.8 - f2.8 -- brighter and more zoom.

Sony RX100 Mark vii: more than I want to spend, at $1300. More zoom than I need (200mm eq), but at f/2.8 - f4.5 -- not as bright.

So I think I will probably be happiest picking up a refurb G5X, or maybe even a gray market one and hope for the best. I'm just looking to educate myself on alternatives and potential gotchas.

Thanks!
Thanks. My goal was to get a "pocket sized&q... (show quote)


If you want the piece of mind of 'new', then buy a new camera direct from Canon or an authorized USA reseller. Don't oversubscribe the work effort on 'refurb', nor oversubscribe the risk of 'used' or 'international'. These cameras are just little bundles of relatively mature technology, about the size of a deck of cards. The 20mm difference of focal length is immaterial if that's the complete difference of a supported vs discontinued model.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.