The Border! (Page 16): I also get tired of hearing the Asylum argument, the Idea that you just need to claim Asylum and get a free pass for years waiting for a court appearance.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

DennyT wrote:

No one including I have the though of asylum seekers are not increasing thedebt !!

But to portray it as a bigger thing than it is is disingenuous at best is nothing more misleading

I also get tired of hearing the Asylum argument, the Idea that you just need to claim Asylum and get a free pass for years waiting for a court appearance.

Triple G

Blurryeyed wrote:

Yes, and we have plenty of them, don't need 10 million more.

Not enough here to match the housing demand.

Triple G

letmedance wrote:

Those Laborers are taking away jobs from American Tax payers, the Myth is that Americans won't do those jobs, the truth is that undocumented workers have depressed the prevailing wages to a point that it is more profitable to stay home.

Not true. Employers are looking for any and all warm bodies who are reliable. Job openings are still all over the place. We have Smith & Wesson, multiple boat manufacturers, meat packing plants, EV battery plants, infrastructure projects who are petitioning for work permits for these workers. Wages are increasing due to lack of labor supply.

https://www.uschamber.com/workforce/understanding-tennessee-labor-market

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1351276/wage-growth-vs-inflation-us/

https://immresearch.org/publications/immigrants-in-the-u-s-economy-overcoming-hurdles-yet-still-facing-barriers/

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

I do believe that federal law requires that Asylum seekers are to remain in custody until an adequate screening is done to determine if there is merit for further adjudication, that's not happening.

Triple G

letmedance wrote:

I also get tired of hearing the Asylum argument, the Idea that you just need to claim Asylum and get a free pass for years waiting for a court appearance.

It's because the rules and processes haven't kept up with the numbers - they need to be changed requiring Congress to act.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/24/politics/new-us-asylum-rule?cid=ios_app

Triple G

Blurryeyed wrote:

I do believe that federal law requires that Asylum seekers are to remain in custody until an adequate screening is done to determine if there is merit for further adjudication, that's not happening.

Yes, it is and efforts are ongoing to make the asylum determination happen quicker.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/24/politics/new-us-asylum-rule?cid=ios_app

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Triple G wrote:

Yes, it is and efforts are ongoing to make the asylum determination happen quicker.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/24/politics/new-us-asylum-rule?cid=ios_app

Instead of sending thousands of agents to protect our border we should be sending thousands of Immigration judges to process Asylum cases. If that happens we should see the number of true asylum cases dwindle as there is no chance of admission without true cause and no long term free pass to plunder or resources while waiting a court date.

Triple G

letmedance wrote:

Instead of sending thousands of agents to protect our border we should be sending thousands of Immigration judges to process Asylum cases. If that happens we should see the number of true asylum cases dwindle as there is no chance of admission without true cause and no long term free pass to plunder or resources while waiting a court date.

I'm advocating and in touch with TN officials to work out a cost analysis for USA to put offices in each State Dept. office to process people in their own country before getting here. Lots of obstacles, but we're committed to the belief that it's the only way to formalize and manage a migration beyond any individual country's control. Go to the source.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Triple G wrote:

Yes, it is and efforts are ongoing to make the asylum determination happen quicker.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/24/politics/new-us-asylum-rule?cid=ios_app

Well, clearly that is not happening. So, is Slo ignoring federal law?

Triple G

Blurryeyed wrote:

Well, clearly that is not happening. So, is Slo ignoring federal law?

No.

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2023/04/27/fact-sheet-us-government-announces-sweeping-new-actions-manage-regional-migration

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/immigration-us-asylum-process-who-qualifies/

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

No.

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2023/04/27/fact-sheet-us-government-announces-sweeping-new-actions-manage-regional-migration

Release Date: April 27, 2023

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Thankfully It appears that taking the problem out of the South West and transporting it all over the nation has awakened the people that believed it was just to much do about nothing, till it showed up in their backyard.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

letmedance wrote:

Thankfully It appears that taking the problem out of the South West and transporting it all over the nation has awakened the people that believed it was just to much do about nothing, till it showed up in their backyard.

Funny how that works.

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

DennyT wrote:

Read the last para in you link( based on numbers from a private. Anti immigration. Study)
It states cost of illegal immigration to all government levels - federal, state and local of $182 B with tax revenue of $31B. ( and that doesn’t even consider the contribution to economy is terms of secondary spending and the secondary jobs created )
That equates to $151 B at all levels of govt.
I’m just saying trying to tieillegal immigration to nation debt is total unfounded .

Then quit saying it..,we are tired of hearing it

InfiniteISO Loc: The Carolinas, USA

Kraken wrote:

Maybe you should let more hard workers over the border.

Is Canada ready to take a few hundred a day, or whatever number would be the same percentage of your population as the US?