radiojohn wrote:
Most of the loosely moderated FB pages for portraits are hit with semi nudes, heavily tattooed glamor, staged model shots and other sexually charged images.
As one poster said, "A portrait should let you see something of a person's personality regardless of what that may be. A glamor or cheesecake shot is meant to display sexy or attractiveness regardless of what a person's personality may be."
Has there been a blurring of types of photos or just sloppy admins. Your thoughts?
Most of the loosely moderated FB pages for portrai... (
show quote)
I hesitate to comment, since I'm not on FaceBook, have never used it, and intend never to use it.
I really don't see a "versus" here — at all. Personally, I like portraits to be about personality. For me, it's all about the expression. It's a glimpse of the person's nature, purpose, presence, soul… whatever that is. Glamourousness and sexiness are projected facets of personality. They may be utter fantasy, but many people want to see that fantasy, or be that fantasy, if only momentarily.
I have absolutely no issues with people showing off their bodies, their expensive fashions, their exotic makeup skills, etc., if that's what they have, or want, to show. Let them project what they wish to project about themselves, within the boundaries of the site's taste or acceptability.
In the end, the subject is MORE in charge of what they want to display than the photographer is. There may, in some instances, be an agent involved, such as in promotional images of actors, or images of models selling a product. OTOH, a lot of images on social media are "selfies", displayed out of pure vanity. Even the ones made by professional photographers may not reflect the tastes and insights of the photographer. Whatever is posted on a site as a "portrait," I think we have to take at face value.
If someone comes to me and says, "Take my portrait, please…," I'm going to have a conversation with them to understand who they are, what makes them "tick," how they wish to appear before others, and most importantly,
why they want to look like that. It's a serious consideration, one that I don't take lightly and one that they shouldn't take lightly, either.
I've been a HUGE fan of Annie Leibovitz since her work appeared in RollingStone in the 1970s. She's an extremely accomplished celebrity and portrait photographer. While a lot of her work shows similar approaches, what sets her apart is her ability to connect with the people she portrays, and reveal something appealing or unusual or insightful about them. She manages to peel back the layers of awkwardness surrounding a portrait session, make a connection, and reveal something more than surface-level about the person. Everything she does supports that skill.