Merlin1300
Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
It’s either 24 or 40. But, I’m not betting on it.
Merlin1300
Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
And this incredible parade of ( - fill in the blank - ) continues, ad infinitum.
-
MAN !! I'll have to come up with some simple math puzzle for next year, that may also live forever.
I'm thinking maybe - a song to the tune of Please My Dear Aunt Sally.
(a few will get it - E was not a concept taught in elementary school, so it was excused for recess).
Merlin1300 wrote:
And this incredible parade of ( - fill in the blank - ) continues, ad infinitum.
-
MAN !! I'll have to come up with some simple math puzzle for next year, that may also live forever.
I'm thinking maybe - a song to the tune of Please My Dear Aunt Sally.
(a few will get it - E was not a concept taught in elementary school, so it was excused for recess).
Realize that the icons that represent the three numbers in the last equation are not mathematically/logically derived from the three equations above them (The fact that a 4-legged table has the value 4 doesn't mean that a 3-legged table has a value of 3). So the values of the icons in the last equation are indeterminate and the answer can be anything.
srt101fan wrote:
Realize that the icons that represent the three numbers in the last equation are not mathematically/logically derived from the three equations above them (The fact that a 4-legged table has the value 4 doesn't mean that a 3-legged table has a value of 3). So the values of the icons in the last equation are indeterminate and the answer can be anything.
Then I'll make the three legged table 27 and the four rolls 12....
Pick a number, any number, forget any logic or deductive reasoning.
Merlin1300
Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
srt101fan wrote:
Realize that the icons that represent the three numbers in the last equation are not mathematically/logically derived from the three equations above them (The fact that a 4-legged table has the value 4 doesn't mean that a 3-legged table has a value of 3). So the values of the icons in the last equation are indeterminate and the answer can be anything.
Its a LOGIC PUZZLE. Of course, if you insist on existential Diractive Morphisms, you can make this into anything you want. But for those of us grounded in Logical observation, the table is not important. The Legs are the defining factor.
Yes - in all prior examples, the table was 4, the rolls were 6, and the clock was 2.
In the question, however, all 3 changed. The table had 3 legs, there were only 4 rolls, and the clock was 5.
So - IF you insist on Table = 4, Rolls = 6 and Clock = 2, THEN the answer COULD be: 4+4x5 = 24
BUT since ALL of the items changed, one must logically assume the values are connected to some other attribute - namely the Number of Legs on the table, the Number of Rolls, and the Number shown on the clock face.
Thus the only LOGICAL answer is 4+3x5 (PDMAS) = 19.
Who knows? Is a timer worth 2 points, or is each minute on a timer worth one point? If a 4 legged table is worth 4 points, does that mean a 3 legged table is worth 3 points, or nothing because it's missing a leg?
mikee wrote:
Who knows? Is a timer worth 2 points, or is each minute on a timer worth one point? If a 4 legged table is worth 4 points, does that mean a 3 legged table is worth 3 points, or nothing because it's missing a leg?
Could be x60 for seconds.....
Are three legged tables 2, 3, 6, 8 times as hard to keep stable?
Well, the trend anymore with almost everything seems to be make it/do what/interpret how you want.....
No rhyme, reason, or <valid> logic.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.