Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
No words, another
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
Dec 12, 2023 12:56:22   #
Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
It's mild compared to webcam sites which have become the modern Sodom and Gommorah of the day. Times change, ask Pee-Wee Herman... oh wait we can't. Life goes on.

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 13:41:48   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Real Nikon Lover wrote:
It's mild compared to webcam sites which have become the modern Sodom and Gommorah of the day. Times change, ask Pee-Wee Herman... oh wait we can't. Life goes on.


True. But I for one would rather see UHH not compared to those sites.

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 17:44:41   #
midnightlight Loc: Thomaston Connecticut
 
I feel you (we) should post whatever we want. If you're offended, don't look.

Tom

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Dec 13, 2023 05:01:40   #
2nefoto
 
Are you suggesting there should be no rules?

Reply
Dec 13, 2023 06:48:09   #
par4fore Loc: Bay Shore N.Y.
 
[quote=midnightlight]I feel you (we) should post whatever we want. If you're offended, don't look.

Tom[/quote
??

Reply
Dec 13, 2023 07:32:21   #
2nefoto
 
Does not appear that the "no rules" question was answered

Reply
Dec 13, 2023 08:09:54   #
midnightlight Loc: Thomaston Connecticut
 
I'm suggesting that no part of the human body should be off limits. I don't feel that that photo was inappropriate.

Tom

Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Dec 13, 2023 14:49:07   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
midnightlight wrote:
I'm suggesting that no part of the human body should be off limits. I don't feel that that photo was inappropriate.

Tom


There is nothing inappropriate in the photo, nor in any photo for that matter. The “appropriateness” is where and why it is posted. (To be blunt, a picture of an anus is fine… in an anatomy text… or maybe a perv mag.)

And I am not asking for a change in rules for UHH; I am simply expressing my opinion that the posted image is not what I expect to see on UHH. At one point in time there was a noticeable distinction between photos in Playboy vs Penthouse and Hustler. I prefer to see UHH be the Playboy of that era, and I know where to go (elsewhere) for the more explicit.

And bottom line regarding the posted image, as a “photograph” or even “nude photograph” I see little to appreciate or enjoy. At best it is exhibitionism.

Reply
Dec 13, 2023 22:47:54   #
Mr. SONY Loc: LI, NY
 
Looks good to me. :-)

Reply
Dec 13, 2023 23:35:12   #
CPR Loc: Nature Coast of Florida
 
Just porno since no redeeming social value. Not even a good snapshot.

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 16:56:38   #
InfiniteISO Loc: The Carolinas, USA
 
JohnFrim wrote:
There is nothing inappropriate in the photo, nor in any photo for that matter. The “appropriateness” is where and why it is posted. (To be blunt, a picture of an anus is fine… in an anatomy text… or maybe a perv mag.)

And I am not asking for a change in rules for UHH; I am simply expressing my opinion that the posted image is not what I expect to see on UHH. At one point in time there was a noticeable distinction between photos in Playboy vs Penthouse and Hustler. I prefer to see UHH be the Playboy of that era, and I know where to go (elsewhere) for the more explicit.

And bottom line regarding the posted image, as a “photograph” or even “nude photograph” I see little to appreciate or enjoy. At best it is exhibitionism.
There is nothing inappropriate in the photo, nor i... (show quote)


I tend to agree with all of your statement. UHH, as I've found out personally, is not the venue for images like this. That said, no matter what the content, images can be appreciated for how well they are executed. For the posters of UHH I think there is a sliding scale based on the intent and composition. If a user here tries to do a traditional figure study and blows the execution they're going to get more support than a photographer that delivers a poorly composed and posed crotch shot.

Reply
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Dec 14, 2023 17:01:54   #
PaulW128 Loc: Long Island, NY
 
InfiniteISO wrote:
I tend to agree with all of your statement. UHH, as I've found out personally, is not the venue for images like this. That said, no matter what the content, images can be appreciated for how well they are executed. For the posters of UHH I think there is a sliding scale based on the intent and composition. If a user here tries to do a traditional figure study and blows the execution they're going to get more support than a photographer that delivers a poorly composed and posed crotch shot.
I tend to agree with all of your statement. UHH,... (show quote)


This!! Thank you

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 17:26:32   #
2nefoto
 
An information request; dies this forum have stated criteria for images to be displayed? When that criteria are not met, what is the procedure?

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 20:50:37   #
Mr. SONY Loc: LI, NY
 
2nefoto wrote:
An information request; dies this forum have stated criteria for images to be displayed? When that criteria are not met, what is the procedure?


Just don't look.

Reply
Dec 14, 2023 23:59:40   #
2nefoto
 
In case you don't realize it you did not answer the question

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.