Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Oh dear - a puzzle for Christmas season - Dec 2023
Page <<first <prev 15 of 24 next> last>>
Dec 12, 2023 11:25:00   #
wbchinook Loc: Everson WA
 
50

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 11:39:53   #
Merlin1300 Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
 
Vienna74 wrote:
4+(4x5) = 24
Nope - the table in the last equation only has 3 legs. 4+(3x5) = 19

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 12:00:08   #
Old Coot
 
twosummers wrote:
Hi there puzzlers - have a go at this one - suggest an answer but DON'T give your method (I want to keep people guessing for a bit) - I'll post the solution in a few days time!

Enjoy


10

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2023 12:00:55   #
Old Coot
 
twosummers wrote:
Hi there puzzlers - have a go at this one - suggest an answer but DON'T give your method (I want to keep people guessing for a bit) - I'll post the solution in a few days time!

Enjoy


16

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 12:01:05   #
gener202002
 
Merlin1300 wrote:
If folks don't bother to read the entire thread, it's no wonder they continue to post wrong answers.
The OP has already posted the answer on Page 9.
If through some deviant math you come up with an answer OTHER than 19, please show your work.


You are all wrong. The answer is 7,659,873,405. I dare you to prove me wrong.

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 12:02:05   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
srt101fan wrote:
I think you're on to something there, Jerry. It's a cute, fun puzzle, but there is no mathematical link leading to an answer.

The first equation shows 3 identical icons (clocks) that represent three numbers that added together will yield "6". Based on the equation, the clock icon must represent the number "2".

The 2nd and 3rd equations bring in additional icons whose values can be determined from those equations.

The fourth equation is not mathematically linked to the others. For example, just because a four-legged table represents the number "4" in the first three equations, doesn't mean that a three-legged table has to represent the number "3".

The fourth equation brings in a new set of icons that are only pictorially, not mathematically, linked to the first three equations. Therefore, you can assign any values to these icons and come up with any answers you want.....

[How's that for overthinking? 😁]
I think you're on to something there, Jerry. It's... (show quote)


Such a stretch!

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 13:53:56   #
inishowenjohn Loc: Hindley Green Wigan
 
If my memory serves me right the answer should be 19

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2023 14:45:07   #
drj5 Loc: Chicago, IL
 
35

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 15:12:06   #
RonBrown111
 
twosummers wrote:
Hi there puzzlers - have a go at this one - suggest an answer but DON'T give your method (I want to keep people guessing for a bit) - I'll post the solution in a few days time!

Enjoy


35

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 15:12:32   #
CCPhotoist Loc: Cape Cod
 
twosummers wrote:
Hi there puzzlers - have a go at this one - suggest an answer but DON'T give your method (I want to keep people guessing for a bit) - I'll post the solution in a few days time!

Enjoy


Thanks for a fun challenge. This post has more than 5000 views. Wonder what the record is?

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 15:44:30   #
bcplimpton Loc: Southern New Jersey
 
The only correct answer must be 35. What's different about the last table?

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2023 15:50:27   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
bcplimpton wrote:
The only correct answer must be 35. What's different about the last table?

3 legs, not 4.....

4 rolls, not 6

PEMDAS
4+3*5=?
4+(3*5)=?
4+15=19

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 15:54:56   #
Old Coot
 
twosummers wrote:
Hi there puzzlers - have a go at this one - suggest an answer but DON'T give your method (I want to keep people guessing for a bit) - I'll post the solution in a few days time!

Enjoy


We don't know because we don't know if the table with 3 legs is less than with 4 and we dont know if the 4 roll bundle is less than the 6 roll and by how much.
Can only use logic when we have the correct informatiopn

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 15:57:44   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Old Coot wrote:
We don't know because we don't know if the table with 3 legs is less than with 4 and we dont know if the 4 roll bundle is less than the 6 roll and by how much.
Can only use logic when we have the correct informatiopn

It's called deductive reasoning.....

The tables in the second and third lines have a value of four (has four legs).
What's different in the table on the fourth line? Missing a leg.(Minus one leg)
The two tables are not "the same" so they cannot have the same value.
Therefore four legs less one is three.
Same with the rolls.....
The image of six rolls has a value of six.

Reply
Dec 12, 2023 15:59:11   #
Merlin1300 Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
 
This post has taken on a life of it's own.
I think it's become a 'Dingbat' counter - one Ding for every post other than 19.
It has morphed from an observational puzzle to merely seasonal fun.
Merry Christmas All

Reply
Page <<first <prev 15 of 24 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.