Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What size memory cards do you normally use?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 13 next> last>>
Dec 8, 2023 11:32:13   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
JBRIII wrote:
Mostly 64GB, have used 256 for solar eclipses where I use bracketing and take as many as 7 images every 15secs for several hours, overkill even here, but don't want to change a card. 256 in action cams used during Snorkeling.

Never reuse vacation chips, third backup, at least two hard drives plus the chips. Why worry about the cost if a few chips compared to the trip.

Chips can become useless after many uses, residual charge build up? Takes a lot, but possible.


I have been using my 4 camera cards (2 bodies, 2 slots each) for probably 15 years now. None of them has become useless or even noticeably diminished capacity. True, the cost is fairly small but I have never found it to be a problem. If a card dies, I am using the dual slots as backup so I'm covered. If I haven't lost a card in 15 years it is unlikely I will lose two in one shoot.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 11:42:51   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
R.G. wrote:
If a card fails you lose everything on it. The smaller the capacity the smaller the loss when they fail. Leaving stuff on a card long term is tempting fate. Some might say the risk is small but others will tell you they've learned the hard way and now play safe. There's something to be said for downloading at the end of every day if possible, and if you're doing that you probably don't need large capacity cards.

If you use your camera to shoot video then large capacity cards have an obvious advantage. If it's stills only and you can download at the end of every day, the chances are that 32GB is plenty. For most people it would be, even when using multi-shot techniques. And for the few that might shoot more than 1000 frames in a single day, changing the card isn't that big a deal. 32GB cards aren't expensive - even the fast ones - so having a spare or two isn't prohibitively expensive (and it's also a good idea).
If a card fails you lose everything on it. The sm... (show quote)


On my list of requirements for my next camera: dual identical card slots with identical specifications. I like the idea of redundancy when I need it, and the ability to seamlessly record video from one card to the next when the first is full.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 11:56:07   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
burkphoto wrote:
On my list of requirements for my next camera: dual identical card slots with identical specifications. I like the idea of redundancy when I need it, and the ability to seamlessly record video from one card to the next when the first is full.


It probably doesn't add much to the cost of a camera and it's obviously a useful feature. I can't think of a better way to carry a spare card.

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2023 12:01:13   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
steve49 wrote:
I have pretty much always used 32g cards. Big enough.
I use a full frame Canon R6 so the files are pretty big.
It brings me in around 1,000 frames.
Generally on a 2 week travel vacation I will pretty much fill a card and sometimes I'll use 2 camera so 32g each.

I did manage to fill 4 cards on a recent to Iceland... never before more than 2.
After a trip I'll generally save the cards and file them.
Locally I'll erase and reuse the cards.

I see but can't really grasp using a giant card... 256g, more?
Why?

Anyway,
What does everybody think on this?
I have pretty much always used 32g cards. Big enou... (show quote)

64 GB is more than adequate, even for my 61MP Sony A7R V.

bwa

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 12:07:47   #
Canisdirus
 
Longshadow wrote:

Curious - In what manner?


If you don't know what the speed of your cards are...or know what it means.

Back to basics for you then.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 12:11:33   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
R.G. wrote:
It probably doesn't add much to the cost of a camera and it's obviously a useful feature. I can't think of a better way to carry a spare card.


Yep. Although card failures are rare, they do happen. Pro event photographers need redundancy to ensure they walk away with usable images. If I covered weddings or photojournalistic assignments or corporate events, I'd want dual slots, saving the same content to two cards, simultaneously.

Years ago, in "the film days," I worked in a lab. One of our customers had 11 teams of photographers making school portraits. I was drafted to call him when TWO of his photographers sent us blank film for processing. In one case, a 100' roll of 46mm film showed up a week later with double exposures running through half of it. In the other, the photographer had failed to load 35mm film properly. When she realized that the leader hadn't engaged, she sent the film in anyway.

The cynic in me says they'd find a way to screw up a job with dual card slots, but it would be less likely to result in a total failure.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 12:18:05   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
burkphoto wrote:
...The cynic in me says they'd find a way to screw up a job with dual card slots, but it would be less likely to result in a total failure.


Yep, foolproof probably doesn't exist, but Murphy-resistant is a possibility.

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2023 12:21:44   #
Basil Loc: New Mexico
 
R.G. wrote:
If a card fails you lose everything on it. The smaller the capacity the smaller the loss when they fail. Leaving stuff on a card long term is tempting fate. Some might say the risk is small but others will tell you they've learned the hard way and now play safe. There's something to be said for downloading at the end of every day if possible, and if you're doing that you probably don't need large capacity cards.

If you use your camera to shoot video then large capacity cards have an obvious advantage. If it's stills only and you can download at the end of every day, the chances are that 32GB is plenty. For most people it would be, even when using multi-shot techniques. And for the few that might shoot more than 1000 frames in a single day, changing the card isn't that big a deal. 32GB cards aren't expensive - even the fast ones - so having a spare or two isn't prohibitively expensive (and it's also a good idea).
If a card fails you lose everything on it. The sm... (show quote)


I agree with you about the possibility of losing a lot if a larger card fails. There is a definite risk. Even though I've never, in many years of shooting, had a card go bad such that I lost everything, but I do take a laptop with me and backup my images often to an external drive. I suppose it's just personal preference, but I just like having the larger capacity as I like to keep images on the card as an additional backup, at least for a while, till I get home from a trip and get images backed up onto my BackBlaze backup as well. What I typically do is have folders for each month of shooting. I name the folders OCT23, NOV23, DEC23, etc. Probably not the most scientific way to do it, but it works for me.

I just took a look at some of my shoots at Bosque Del Apache and saw that I had in the neighborhood of 1200-1500 shots in a single day. When I shoot RAW, I'd say the average file size is around 45MP, so on a 128GB card I could get at least a couple days shooting without changing card.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 12:27:27   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
burkphoto wrote:
Great advice...

Cards are CHEAP compared to film and processing. A decent SanDisk 64GB Extreme PRO UHS-I SDXC card costs $14.50, less than a roll of Ektachrome 100 film ($22 at B&H) OR processing that film ($21 at The Darkroom Dot Com)!


Plus, it is very hard to reuse film!

---

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 12:35:35   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Jack 13088 wrote:
I’m a rebel so I reformat the card in the computer right after import and a copy has been backed up off site via DropBox. I increment a a count in the volume label so if one ever fails I’ll know how many times it was formatted. Unless the label is also unreadable. DUH

Not a rebel. MANY feel most comfortable re-formatting.
I don't think the number of times it was formatted has much to do with a failure as much as total writes in general.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 13:13:50   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
steve49 wrote:
I have pretty much always used 32g cards. Big enough.
I use a full frame Canon R6 so the files are pretty big.
It brings me in around 1,000 frames.
Generally on a 2 week travel vacation I will pretty much fill a card and sometimes I'll use 2 camera so 32g each.

I did manage to fill 4 cards on a recent to Iceland... never before more than 2.
After a trip I'll generally save the cards and file them.
Locally I'll erase and reuse the cards.

I see but can't really grasp using a giant card... 256g, more?
Why?

Anyway,
What does everybody think on this?
I have pretty much always used 32g cards. Big enou... (show quote)


When I bought my first digital cameras, they used Compact Flash Cards. They were relatively expensive and didn't come in particularly large sizes. Nor would my cameras use large cards. I remember a firmware update that increased the compatibility of my D200 to include 4 GB memory cards. Somewhere along the way, a thought came into my mind that it would be smart to choose memory cards that would hold about as many exposures as the battery would provide power for. That led to my having a number of 2 GB (and later, 4 GB) memory cards. As time passed, I got a D300. Firmware updates got it up to 16 GB cards, which was fortunate, since my local memory seller was moving away from the now outdated 1 and 2 GB cards.

Eventually, I moved to cameras that offered two card slots and had lots more resolution. I also started collecting raw files as well as JPEGs. Memory cards got bigger. My retailers continues moving up the scale of minimum sizes of cards offered for sale.

Now I have a 325 GB CFE Type B (for raw) and a 256 GB SD in my D850. That's about 3300 exposures. Less if I happen to store a couple of video clips. Same arrangement in my D500. 6800 exposures, which is complete overkill, but it maintains consistency amd avoids confusion. A backup for each camera wilol eventually be equjipped the same way. Right now, one of them still has about half half as much memory in each slot.

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2023 13:22:06   #
RightOnPhotography Loc: Quebec,QC
 
My files are about 50Mb each. I have 2 slots in my Nikon Z7ii. In slot 1 I have Sony XQD 64Mb and in slot 2 - SD 64Mb.
Slot 2 is set as "overflow". I have never run out of space.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 13:27:56   #
tillmanb
 
I use a 512GB and a 1TB in a Canon R3. I do that because I cannot ask for a performance to stop while I change cards. The speed of the 1 TB card is inadequate to keep up with the camera. I rely upon the 512 GB card not filling up. I shoot only RAW and have had as many as 35,000 shots in a day. My second camera is a 1 DX III my second shooter uses two 128GB cards. I use only Sandisk cards.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 13:29:54   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
steve49 wrote:
I have pretty much always used 32g cards. Big enough.
I use a full frame Canon R6 so the files are pretty big.
It brings me in around 1,000 frames.
Generally on a 2 week travel vacation I will pretty much fill a card and sometimes I'll use 2 camera so 32g each.

I did manage to fill 4 cards on a recent to Iceland... never before more than 2.
After a trip I'll generally save the cards and file them.
Locally I'll erase and reuse the cards.

I see but can't really grasp using a giant card... 256g, more?
Why?

Anyway,
What does everybody think on this?
I have pretty much always used 32g cards. Big enou... (show quote)


I have cards of all sizes and 4 types I have accumulated over the years. But lately I have only bought 128GB.
Between myself, my wife and our special needs son (he has a little pocket zoom) we have 9 cameras and my wife has a Camcorder that use cards, I get her 256GB. I also have an old camcorder that uses tapes.
The wife loves video and chews up cards at a high rate. Jon will click at random and sometimes will push the video button and forget to turn it off so he can go through a card fast at times.
I do a lot of birds and usually use burst, so I can go through a card in a hurry. Birds in flight can use up cards in a hurry on hi-speed burst trying to get "that" pose/composition.

I have about 15 128GB, 2 or 3 256GB and about 20 various sizes from less than 1GB to 64GB of 4 types and various ages back to the 90s. I probably forgot some, in fact, I just remembered somewhere I have a 1TB card for emergency backup of images I import onto my laptop when traveling.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 13:30:51   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
steve49 wrote:
I have pretty much always used 32g cards. Big enough.
I use a full frame Canon R6 so the files are pretty big.
It brings me in around 1,000 frames.
Generally on a 2 week travel vacation I will pretty much fill a card and sometimes I'll use 2 camera so 32g each.

I did manage to fill 4 cards on a recent to Iceland... never before more than 2.
After a trip I'll generally save the cards and file them.
Locally I'll erase and reuse the cards.

I see but can't really grasp using a giant card... 256g, more?
Why?

Anyway,
What does everybody think on this?
I have pretty much always used 32g cards. Big enou... (show quote)


My Canon 5D Mark IV has a CF slot and a SD slot. I usually buy 64 Gig cards when on sale. It is easier to manage and work with. I don’t re-format the cards. I label the cards and put them away.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.