This is what I found... did an image search- doesn't appear in this search by image at image.google.com or TinEye etc.
So I looked into detecting AI generated images... found several links.. here is one I did a screen capture of after uploading the image to it. .
to the OP..."Flack"?....
It isn't a photograph, It isn't an illustration... It's computer generated to a level that is getting scary. The old adage : "Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see" will have to be rewritten --- where you can't believe anything.
Can't argue, she is a pretty and attractive arrangement of pixels!
Rich2236
Loc: E. Hampstead, New Hampshire
bdk wrote:
Isnt she pretty.
I wasnt sure I wanted to post this . Im sure i'll be getting a lot of flack
but here it is.
If this is a portent of things to come, there won't be any need for photography at all ! Hell, there won't be a need for anything...Just create anything out of NOTHING!!!
I didn't know how to do that, but there was something odd about the image.
RichieC wrote:
This is what I found... did an image search- doesn't appear in this search by image at image.google.com or TinEye etc.
So I looked into detecting AI generated images... found several links.. here is one I did a screen capture of after uploading the image to it. .
to the OP..."Flack"?....
It isn't a photograph, It isn't an illustration... It's computer generated to a level that is getting scary. The old adage : "Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see" will have to be rewritten --- where you can't believe anything.
Can't argue, she is a pretty and attractive arrangement of pixels!
This is what I found... did an image search- doesn... (
show quote)
tried a few sample pics on that website and sadly it failed to pick out genuine human pics...
the OP seems to be keeping the secret.
RichieC wrote:
This is what I found... did an image search- doesn't appear in this search by image at image.google.com or TinEye etc.
So I looked into detecting AI generated images... found several links.. here is one I did a screen capture of after uploading the image to it. .
to the OP..."Flack"?....
It isn't a photograph, It isn't an illustration... It's computer generated to a level that is getting scary. The old adage : "Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see" will have to be rewritten --- where you can't believe anything.
Can't argue, she is a pretty and attractive arrangement of pixels!
This is what I found... did an image search- doesn... (
show quote)
I was wondering about the proportions showing. Most of the examples I have seen of AI women seemed to show the same waist to hip slope. Would love to see the photos that were used to make the composite.
bwana
Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
RichieC wrote:
... Can't argue, she is a pretty and attractive arrangement of pixels!
I guess when it comes right down to it any digital image can be said to be 'arrangement of pixels'...
bwa
RogStrix wrote:
tried a few sample pics on that website and sadly it failed to pick out genuine human pics...
What were the percentages it returned on those " human pics"... Ie 60-40%. 49-51% , I was looking to see if I could find a tool in case I was wrong. This one returned 0.82% human... so less than a percent.
Sicko's are making AI generated child porn, Law Enforcement has decided that it is still crime. I don't get child porn myself... but I can't wrap my head around who specifically is the victim if it is fake... I can understand the fact that that age group is adversely impacted - even if they are fakes... people would doctor real images, or law enforcement would have to prove they aren't real- and it creates a market-so I guess that is why. ...
Funny that fake nudes I think protect people who have been hacked or whatever, as they can say they are fake, and who could tell? .
RichieC wrote:
What were the percentages it returned on those " human pics"... Ie 60-40%. 49-51% , I was looking to see if I could find a tool in case I was wrong. This one returned 0.82% human... so less than a percent.
Sicko's are making AI generated child porn, Law Enforcement has decided that it is still crime. I don't get child porn myself... but I can't wrap my head around who specifically is the victim if it is fake... I can understand the fact that that age group is adversely impacted - even if they are fakes... people would doctor real images, or law enforcement would have to prove they aren't real- and it creates a market-so I guess that is why. ...
Funny that fake nudes I think protect people who have been hacked or whatever, as they can say they are fake, and who could tell? .
What were the percentages it returned on those &qu... (
show quote)
I think the percentage tended to reflect how much Photoshop work had been carried out, although a non human picture of tree branches on a beach came up as 98% AI?
As with all things it's left to our judgement to work out what is real and what isn't though I share your concerns about the way AI is progressing under the hands of those who wish to pursue 'other subjects'.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
While AI did a great job on the woman I can’t say the same for the rock that is a poor facsimile of a horse’s butt!
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
toxdoc42 wrote:
Why flack?
And now we know why... AI.
I am still glad you posted it. There is a lesson to be learned from the exercise.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.