Gender Issues and Public Bathrooms: A solution.
Nov 16, 2023 09:45:49 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
I appreciate your concern with the border. If you'... (show quote)
Don't be so sure. In the recent past the "border issues" mainly affected the border states. This time out the Feds have sent them all over the place. At least 50,000 to NYC, hell, they're at the Holiday Inn 3 miles from my house in MA. I think this will end up being a gross miscalculation by the Dems.
Nov 16, 2023 09:58:34 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
thom w wrote:
Have a little pride. It really isn't that hard to read your post and think about whether that is really what you want to say before hitting the send button. That you don't do this, or look for errors from your voice to text, shows just how little respect you have for your audience. You are obviously more focused on your post count than getting any believable points across. Now I'm off to my corner to do penance for once again getting sucked it to responding to you.
The irony of you claiming that I’m not having respect to the audience. It is you if I remember right that said that you are not a very good speller and sometimes are too lazy to use your spellcheck, which was evident in multiple of your posts. You freaking hypocrite.
Nov 16, 2023 10:07:51 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Racmanaz wrote:
The irony of you claiming that I’m not having respect to the audience. It is you if I remember right that said that you are not a very good speller and sometimes are too lazy to use your spellcheck, which was evident in multiple of your posts. You freaking hypocrite.
You are misconstruing, but that is no surprise.
Nov 16, 2023 11:10:38 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
thom w wrote:
You are misconstruing, but that is no surprise.
Wrong again little liar. But it’s not surprising that you lefties have double standards.
Nov 16, 2023 15:31:54 #
Racmanaz wrote:
The irony of you claiming that I’m not having respect to the audience. It is you if I remember right that said that you are not a very good speller and sometimes are too lazy to use your spellcheck, which was evident in multiple of your posts. You freaking hypocrite.
Ain't it awful?
"Calm the hell down grasshopper, you're like a bee in a bottle. You'll blow another valve." Ghastly Granny Foxx
Nov 24, 2023 18:21:34 #
If one has a problem with sharing a bathroom. HOLD it.
Nov 24, 2023 18:41:38 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
If one has a problem with sharing a bathroom. HOLD it.
Well, that depends.
Nov 24, 2023 18:45:27 #
Kraken wrote:
Well, that depends.
If one uses Depends, it's not an issue, right?
Nov 24, 2023 18:58:32 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
If one uses Depends, it's not an issue, right?
Haven't put any on yet, I've always made it to the washroom in time. I hate running water.
Nov 24, 2023 18:59:52 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Kraken wrote:
Haven't put any on yet, I've always made it to the washroom in time. I hate running water.
Most people who stink and don’t bathe hate running water
Nov 24, 2023 19:02:25 #
Kraken wrote:
Haven't put any on yet, I've always made it to the washroom in time. I hate running water.
Ssh, I have a stash in my closet, in case. lol
Everytime wifey asks me to refill her glass of water, I end up at the bathroom peeing.
Nov 24, 2023 19:04:30 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Most people who stink and don’t bathe hate running water
I guess living in a garage you would know.
Nov 25, 2023 10:28:19 #
Effate wrote:
Are you confusing being gay with gender dysphoria because even though the terms are lumped together (LGBTQ) they are quite different. I am surprised some enterprising attorney hasn’t sued for access under the Americans with Disability Act since the American Psychiatric Association has labeled gender dysphoria a mental disorder.
Once the LGB community decided to add the T, the entire movement / agenda lost its logical cohesion. LGB women were defined first as women, with L,G, or B as adjectives specifying particular attributes of said women. The T agenda, though, by abject necessity, has to eliminate the definition of ‘woman’ and of ‘man’, and in so doing actually ‘undefines ‘ ‘lesbian’ ‘gay’ and ‘bisexual’ as well.
If ‘man’ has no definition, and a biological woman somehow meets the definition of ‘man’, then we have the non-trivial issue of describing the sexual preferences of trans ‘men’ vs biological men. If each of these prefer ‘men’ (and for this example, let’s go with men XY biology) is the trans man ‘gay’ for preferring relationships that involve an XX and an XY person? By allowing biologically excluded genetics into the tent of ‘man’ or ‘woman’ the result is a loss of definition of all terms related to L G B people and a loss of any meanigful. Protections for them.
And don’t even get me, a girls athletics coach, going on the abject violation of women’s protections that is occurring by allowing people of XY biology into women’s sports. There is nothing more anti-woman than declaring a former male to be a superior or noteworthy ‘woman’.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.