Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lumix FZ1000 II vs Canon R10
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 25, 2023 09:19:52   #
Jack B Loc: Mount Pleasant, SC
 
mvetrano2 wrote:
Over the years (76 now) I have been trying to go lighter and lighter because holding large, heavey SLR and DSLR cameras and heavy pro lenses has taken its toll. A couple of years ago I traded all DSLRs for an all mirrorless set to lighten the load, and now even these are getting harder and harder to use, so I am even going lighter because I am exercising my hobby lesser ans lesser.

I currently have the canon R6 and R10 with a myriad of RF and EF lenses which have been used less and less frequently nodding to my G7XIII for travel and my (purched used) Panasonic ZS20 for everything else. The ZS20 stays in the car to be available whenever I need to take a photo. These may not take the wonderful photos of the larger (and heavier) equipment, but they are easier on the arms and I can always correct the photos in post processing.

If I were you, in your current situation, (similar to mine) I would opt for the lighter FX1000.
Over the years (76 now) I have been trying to go l... (show quote)


Thank you for your comments. What was your overall impression of the R10?
Jack B

Reply
Nov 25, 2023 10:12:30   #
mvetrano2 Loc: Commack, NY
 
The R10 is much lighter and smaller than the R6, but lacks IBIS and the mechanical shutter is louder than that of the R6. It is always loaded with a Tamron 16-300 and adapter, and is only used for photos of my grandchildren's sporting events because of it's range. I find that it is cumbersome in use, and I do get some shaky shots because of the weight and length. I have tried the ZS20 for some of these events, but find it's accuracy a bit lacking.

Reply
Nov 25, 2023 10:13:39   #
47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
 
I have a Canon R5 and a single RF lens plus a bunch of EF, the latter left over from buys over the years ending with a 5d4. Years ago with a 60d on vacation, I also discovered that it got heavier during the day. For the next getaway, I brought a G1x iii and G3x instead, and have never looked back. Occasionally, we’ll see a RX10, but of the Sony shooters have an RX100 or a60** series.

Reply
 
 
Nov 25, 2023 10:31:36   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Jack B wrote:
Fellow UHHers:
My main camera combination is a Canon R7 with R 24-105mm L lens. There is also a Canon flash with the system. All work beautifully together. Used it extensively at a family Thanksgivig gathering yesterday. By the end of the day, the camera system was feeling very heavy but the photos were great (for the most part!). On the way home thought about how a "bridge" camera would have been easier to work with since the photos do not need to be "world" class. In addition to the R lens listed above, I have four other R lens, not L-types but good glass. The two cameras listed in the intro are current considerations. Of course, the R10 is not a "bridge" camera but with a zoom lens it could be used as one with the built in flash. It would be mucn lighter than the R7 combo and would take excellent photos. The Lumix listed is a true bridge camera and gets good reviews. The photos would probably not equal those from the R10 (my guess). Cost is not a factor as the two are roughly the same price. Know this has been wordy and thank you for reading this far. Please share your thoughts with me on this concernig a possible purchase. Again, thank you.
Jack B
Fellow UHHers: br My main camera combination is a ... (show quote)


Yes, the R10 could be a consideration for you - having a decent/fast zoom lens to put on it is where the big question comes in .... ! ?
OTOH, the Zeiss equipped Sony RX10m4 or the RX100 m6/7 will definitely fit the bill for what you are looking for - don't cheap out here ! The Lumix is a step DOWN in the 1 inch sensor area - especially as concerns the LENS.

Reply
Nov 25, 2023 11:42:35   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
47greyfox wrote:
I have a Canon R5 and a single RF lens plus a bunch of EF, the latter left over from buys over the years ending with a 5d4. Years ago with a 60d on vacation, I also discovered that it got heavier during the day. For the next getaway, I brought a G1x iii and G3x instead, and have never looked back. Occasionally, we’ll see a RX10, but of the Sony shooters have an RX100 or a60** series.


The only current Canon in that series is the G7x Mark iii. I went with the Panasonic DMC-ZS100 which has an EVF that the Canon does not and it costs less.

Reply
Nov 25, 2023 12:59:50   #
Retired CPO Loc: Travel full time in an RV
 
jcwall396 wrote:
Iceland was a "bucket list" trip for me and it was just stunning. I'll try to post a few pics here....all taken with the Z50 and the 18-140mm lens....


Outstanding! Thank you for sharing these!...Some day!

Reply
Nov 25, 2023 16:17:09   #
joecichjr Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
 
jcwall396 wrote:
Iceland was a "bucket list" trip for me and it was just stunning. I'll try to post a few pics here....all taken with the Z50 and the 18-140mm lens....


Unadulterated, utter photographic magnificence +++ 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

Reply
 
 
Dec 5, 2023 12:18:17   #
Jack B Loc: Mount Pleasant, SC
 
To all who responded to my original posting, I again thank you. The following is to let you know the outcome. During the searching process, a number of bridge cameras were considered. The decision to purchase the Canon R10 was made based on two factors: the offerings of the R10 and the price offered by Canon for a rehab R10. The price was $599 which was roughly $400 less than the original price and $300 less than sale price. The R10 arrived yesterday. After taking a number of photos, the R10 was the right choice for me. Attached are three sample photos taken this morning. They were shot in RAW with minor cropping, no other modificatioins. The mass of the R10 is less than half of thr R7 plus attached flash.
Jack B


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Dec 5, 2023 14:25:01   #
mvetrano2 Loc: Commack, NY
 
Jack B wrote:
To all who responded to my original posting, I again thank you. The following is to let you know the outcome. During the searching process, a number of bridge cameras were considered. The decision to purchase the Canon R10 was made based on two factors: the offerings of the R10 and the price offered by Canon for a rehab R10. The price was $599 which was roughly $400 less than the original price and $300 less than sale price. The R10 arrived yesterday. After taking a number of photos, the R10 was the right choice for me. Attached are three sample photos taken this morning. They were shot in RAW with minor cropping, no other modificatioins. The mass of the R10 is less than half of thr R7 plus attached flash.
Jack B
To all who responded to my original posting, I aga... (show quote)


Good luck and good choice.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.