Technology generally evolves from the rudimentary level to the spectacular level. AI will evolve as processing power, creativity, competition and demand progresses. Consider how digital cameras have evolves since the 1980's. Think about the evolution of personal computers, hard drives, solid state storage, automobiles and televisions. AI is still in its infancy.
This certainly does not look real to me. Looks like a very slick illustration.
milescherkasky wrote:
This certainly does not look real to me. Looks like a very slick illustration.
What gives you the idea that it's supposed to look real?
JohnSwanda wrote:
What gives you the idea that it's supposed to look real?
You get full marks for that one !
After reading through many of these remarks, including my own, I believe that the future problems we are to face is not the presences of artificial intelligence, but reather the absence of any other.
This thread was about AI as it applies to photography and the image posted did not look like a photograph.
milescherkasky wrote:
This thread was about AI as it applies to photography and the image posted did not look like a photograph.
"Photography" (a very broad spectrum) and "photograph" are not necessarily equal......
Albeit some think they are or
must be.
milescherkasky wrote:
This thread was about AI as it applies to photography and the image posted did not look like a photograph.
The OP stated early on he should have posted it in the AI section because it isn't a photograph.
JohnSwanda wrote:
The OP stated early on he should have posted it in the AI section because it isn't a photograph.
Seems just fine in "Main Photography
Discussion"...
Canisdirus wrote:
Except your conclusion is...delusional.
AI will completely take over still pro photography statistically...hobby?...few care...but AI will dominate there as well.
Folks will choose the path of least resistance...like we always have...that's AI.
There are trillions being spent on AI...right now...many trillions to come.
AI hasn't even gotten started yet.
With war it could be a gamechanger, in photography, not so much.
It is just going to be another tool to use, misuse and be confused with.
No amount of descriptions, money or time will enable AI rendering to show the actual & real event.
As previously mentioned by our fellow, try using that with "colonoscopy".
Because, even if one sniffs glue from birth or read through the whole congress library, an illustration and a photograph will never be the same banana.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.