Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Retirement Camera
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Nov 5, 2023 15:11:48   #
bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.
 
a fantastic camera and coming down in price all the time. The nikon d850 ...

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 15:15:43   #
srt101fan
 
bdk wrote:
a fantastic camera and coming down in price all the time. The nikon d850 ...


Light weight?

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 15:36:25   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
srt101fan wrote:
Light weight?


Not the D850!

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2023 15:45:28   #
rwoodvira
 
[quote=Tay]
Sorry for your disability and upcoming surgery - good luck with that. I've had cancer twice, chemo, radiation and multiple surgeries.

I have a Sony a7riii which is large; but i don't use it as much as I do my all-in-one. I walk, as part of therapy, around a lake daily - roughly a mile. I bought a used Sony rx100 vi which has a Zeiss zoom 28-200 equivalent with a 1 inch center and have gotten some great shot with it. There is a newer model, the vii. the series has consistently been recommended as one of the best travel cameras. If you go used, I'd check with KEH, mpb, or Usedcamerapro. If you want something with a longer range, the Sony rx10 iv goes to 600, but its quite a bit heavier.


(Download)

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 16:40:58   #
photophile Loc: Lakewood, Ohio, USA
 
[quote=rwoodvira]
Tay wrote:

Sorry for your disability and upcoming surgery - good luck with that. I've had cancer twice, chemo, radiation and multiple surgeries.

I have a Sony a7riii which is large; but i don't use it as much as I do my all-in-one. I walk, as part of therapy, around a lake daily - roughly a mile. I bought a used Sony rx100 vi which has a Zeiss zoom 28-200 equivalent with a 1 inch center and have gotten some great shot with it. There is a newer model, the vii. the series has consistently been recommended as one of the best travel cameras. If you go used, I'd check with KEH, mpb, or Usedcamerapro. If you want something with a longer range, the Sony rx10 iv goes to 600, but its quite a bit heavier.
br Sorry for your disability and upcoming surgery... (show quote)


Nice one.

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 17:23:16   #
Hip Coyote
 
PHRubin wrote:
Small and lightweight is at odds with top quality images. The more of 1, the less of the other. The 1" pocketable or bridge cameras are in the middle with good quality and lightweight. I favor the Panasonic offerings because of the bang for buck. The ZS100 (aka TZ100) or ZS200D pocketable or the FZ1000 or FZ2500 bridge cameras in particular. The much more expensive Sony models competing are the RX100vii pocketable or the RX10iv bridge. I wonder if the pop-up EVF on the RX100 is too weak to stand up to rough handling. Also, some comment that the Sony menus are not very intuitive. However, they may have slightly better quality images.

The 1" sensor models are much better than the 1/2.3" alternatives (in similar packages) in having lower noise levels, especially important in low light situations.
The bridge models have more "reach" with zooms that go further into the tele range but are bigger.

I own the ZS100 and love it. The only drawbacks for me is that the built-in flashes on pocketables aren't very strong, and my subjects need long lenses, so I also have the ZS80, a 1/2.3" model which allows for longer "reach".
Small and lightweight is at odds with top quality ... (show quote)


I have the RX100 and kinda wonder the same thing. Jury is still out on that little thing. Its a nice travel camera, but I did miss my M43 gear on the last trip. The OP had a relatively clear list of things he wanted. MU43 and the Sony 6XXXX series seemed to be more on the mark.

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 17:27:31   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
Wingpilot wrote:
Actually his second criteria is light weight. He spelled it “lightweight” so it could be overlooked. To be fair, light weight is fairly relative, depending on the gear. So I am assuming he’s not interested in a DSLR, but an M4/3 might fit the ticket or a camera such as the Sony A6xxx series, Nikon Z50 or Canon R6 might fit in his category. Probably full frame not so much.


Have to confess to missing that when reading his post on my phone. But in that same #2 he also calls out "durable," which I did see. Resolving between those two requirements may require some significant trade-offs.

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2023 17:38:40   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
This is from my RX100 M7. Next shot is from my A6300 with Sony 18-135 lens.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 18:15:51   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
larryepage wrote:
Have to confess to missing that when reading his post on my phone. But in that same #2 he also calls out "durable," which I did see. Resolving between those two requirements may require some significant trade-offs.


Durable pretty much means heavier gear. Light weight usually means exercising due care to prevent damage to the gear. And a few other trade-offs. I suppose it all boils down to what one requires and what they are willing to accept.

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 18:16:29   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
RKL349 wrote:
Nikon Z50 with either the 16-50mm and 50-250mm lenses or the 24mm f/1.7 in place of the 16-50mm. Great for travel, should fit your budget.


My vote also.

I use it much more than my Z7ii and it was the only one I took to Europe a couple weeks ago. Well, that plus my iPhone 14 plus. It takes awesome images. Can shoot in raw. Up to 44 MP images. Three lenses up to 3X. It would do the job you need and is totally inconspicuous on the streets nowadays. Plus the image editing capability in the camera is awesome.

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 18:55:59   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
bdk wrote:
a fantastic camera and coming down in price all the time. The nikon d850 ...


LOL . and rolling on the ground

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2023 19:00:23   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
larryepage wrote:
Have to confess to missing that when reading his post on my phone. But in that same #2 he also calls out "durable," which I did see. Resolving between those two requirements may require some significant trade-offs.


Not with OM or Panasonic. If the camera is stated as weatherproof, it is weatherproof. That usually means wind, dust, and snow too (at least it is for my former E-M5 and for my present E-M1 mkII and mkIII). There are still videos of an E-M1 sitting for a half hour in a shower. And once wiped relatively dry, kept right on taking pictures. And I have been literally soaked down to my underwear and socks and still shooting in the rain. I should have taken a picture of all the other cameras being kept out of the rain and not being used in Mikonos. And when on a cruise, one shoots because that is the time one is there - sunny weather or not.

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 19:00:27   #
ArtzDarkroom Loc: Near Disneyland-Orange County, California
 
Start shooting exclusively with a high end Smartphone. They are light weight, always available and the images can be edited in/camera/phone and the best part... they upload to an online account easily for your friends/family to see immediately what you are upto while you are on this quest. Your images right now want to be seen by those who love you and are interested in your work. Even us here in UHH would like to be a part of this journey.

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 19:11:29   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
Wingpilot wrote:
Durable pretty much means heavier gear. Light weight usually means exercising due care to prevent damage to the gear. And a few other trade-offs. I suppose it all boils down to what one requires and what they are willing to accept.


No heavy gear for OM or Panasonic to meet durable. I have shot in the pouring rain using my E-M1 mkIII and 300 f4 Pro IS lens (600 f4 in 35mm angle of view). I paid $2350 for my lens. Which one of the 600 f4 IS lenses of Canon, Nikon, and Sony at $12,000+ can be taken out in the rain without any special additional gear? 4/3rds is one of the most durable brands out there for the dollar.

Reply
Nov 5, 2023 19:27:08   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
wdross wrote:
No heavy gear for OM or Panasonic to meet durable. I have shot in the pouring rain using my E-M1 mkIII and 300 f4 Pro IS lens (600 f4 in 35mm angle of view). I paid $2350 for my lens. Which one of the 600 f4 IS lenses of Canon, Nikon, and Sony at $12,000+ can be taken out in the rain without any special additional gear? 4/3rds is one of the most durable brands out there for the dollar.


Good to know. I haven’t tried M 4/3, but I could be lured.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.