Retirement Camera (Page 3): Beautiful images and a great set! The Z50 clearly punches above its weight class.

yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey

jcwall396 wrote:

These are with the Z50 and the 18-140mm lens....

Beautiful images and a great set! The Z50 clearly punches above its weight class.

Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak

yssirk123 wrote:

Beautiful images and a great set! The Z50 clearly punches above its weight class.

From what I’ve seen and read, Bill, the Z50 is an outstanding camera, especially when paired with the right lens. I understand that the two kit lenses are very good.

Hip Coyote

Wingpilot wrote:

The OP states he is considering a light weight cam... (show quote)

I didn’t think of that. Also a great idea! The Sony A6xxx is a great alternative to the mu43 systems.

One question. As I mentioned and
I think Chg_Canon mentioned the IBIS is an important feature for us traveling photogs. How does the Sony match up in that area?

I see a lot of folks in tourist areas carrying them for sure. May be a good alternative.

Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak

Hip Coyote wrote:

I didn’t think of that. Also a great idea! The Sony A6xxx is a great alternative to the mu43 systems.

One question. As I mentioned and
I think Chg_Canon mentioned the IBIS is an important feature for us traveling photogs. How does the Sony match up in that area?

I see a lot of folks in tourist areas carrying them for sure. May be a good alternative.

I believe the higher end A6xxx cameras such as the A6500,6600 and 6700 have IBIS. The others rely on the OIS system in the lenses. The OIS works well, but with IBIS there is full axis stabilization.

PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA

Small and lightweight is at odds with top quality images. The more of 1, the less of the other. The 1" pocketable or bridge cameras are in the middle with good quality and lightweight. I favor the Panasonic offerings because of the bang for buck. The ZS100 (aka TZ100) or ZS200D pocketable or the FZ1000 or FZ2500 bridge cameras in particular. The much more expensive Sony models competing are the RX100vii pocketable or the RX10iv bridge. I wonder if the pop-up EVF on the RX100 is too weak to stand up to rough handling. Also, some comment that the Sony menus are not very intuitive. However, they may have slightly better quality images.

The 1" sensor models are much better than the 1/2.3" alternatives (in similar packages) in having lower noise levels, especially important in low light situations.
The bridge models have more "reach" with zooms that go further into the tele range but are bigger.

I own the ZS100 and love it. The only drawbacks for me is that the built-in flashes on pocketables aren't very strong, and my subjects need long lenses, so I also have the ZS80, a 1/2.3" model which allows for longer "reach".

User ID

Hip Coyote wrote:

I didn’t think of that. Also a great idea! The Sony A6xxx is a great alternative to the mu43 systems.

One question. As I mentioned and
I think Chg_Canon mentioned the IBIS is an important feature for us traveling photogs. How does the Sony match up in that area?

I see a lot of folks in tourist areas carrying them for sure. May be a good alternative.

The IBIS is not in the lower range of a6XXX.
An a6000 would be more travel friendly if you stick to OIS. Was using the 6000 but bumped up to the 6500 to get IBIS *and* Silent mode. Getting both functions really jusified the cost.

The Sony APSC range includes some compact "street primes". Acoarst small primes tend to lack OIS, so again IBIS rules.

All you need. (Or later a6700 and 18-135.)

(Download)

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

imagemeister wrote:

Will the Z50 and 18-140 lens fit in your pocket ??

He didn’t ask for that.

dsims1960 Loc: Texas

Not really sure what all you have as a camera. I have a Canon Rebel T5 that has 2 lens with it, and a few other things. I’m sorry to hear about you health issues and I will pray for you. I will send you pictures of this camera if you would like it. I upgraded to a Nikon d5600 then I upgraded to a Nikon z50.

jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana

I would suggest a bridge camera.

tgreenhaw

Modern medicine is almost miraculous, and coupled with a positive attitude enables our bodies to heal.

As a Canon guy, I would opt for an RP with a 24-240 & 16mm lens. Get a USA Gear case and neck strap with pouches for an extra battery and memory card.

User ID

tgreenhaw wrote:

Modern medicine is almost miraculous, and coupled with a positive attitude enables our bodies to heal.

As a Canon guy, I would opt for an RP with a 24-240 & 16mm lens. Get a USA Gear case and neck strap with pouches for an extra battery and memory card.

If ... IF !!! ... you need FF, the RP is a good lightweight option. I verrrrry nearly bought one. No opinion on a 24-240 but OTOH that 16mm ?? For $250 I couldnt resist that one. EVERY Canon FF users should have one. Its compact, cheap, and just great.

Acoarst its not as amazing for APSC, but its not too big, is plenty wide even though not "ultra", and at its refurbed price its still THE bargain "utility wide" OEM lens for an APSC. Its my one and only RF lens cuz its just so damnt irresistable (everything else are EOS SLR lenses via the adapter).

BTW I think the RP became the R8 ????

dbrugger25 Loc: Raleigh, NC

Tay wrote:

Recently retired with a disability. Got some horri... (show quote)

This might be larger than what you have in-mind but the Canon R7 is much smaller than a full size and much lighter. It has an RF-s 30 MB sensor. Add the 10-150 mm or the 24-240 lens and it can capture high detailed imaged over a very broad effective focal range. It's relatively affordable and has many of Canon's most advanced features that are found on the R5 and other premium cameras. It has a crop factor of 1.6. All the full size RF lenses are compatible.

I have an R5 and an EOS 5D-MkIV. I find myself reaching for the R7 very often. Look at Ken Rockwell's review for a full summary of its qualities and capabilities.

larryepage Loc: North Texas area

xt2 wrote:

I think the OP wanted a light weight camera system…

I read his post once again...just to make sure. He lists several criteria. Lightweight is nowhere on the list, although it could be inferred that he is not looking for any 5 pound lenses.

By the way...I have been mobility-limited, with a placard, since 2012. So I understand. Having some limitations does not mean that life as we know it has ended, or that it must end.

lreisner Loc: Union,NJ

Tay wrote:

Recently retired with a disability. Got some horri... (show quote)

I haven't read through the entire thread but I am recommending the Sony RX 10IV. It is the most under rated camera made. It is not cheap on face value but once you think about it, it is a great buy since you will not need to buy any extra lenses. It has a 24-600mm Carls Zeiss Zoom lens that can be doubled 1200 digital. It will do anything that a non bridge camera can do. It has amazing autofocus and a 1 inch sensor. This camera is not very heavy and is great for street photography. The reason why Sony will probably never come out with a V, is because if they promoted this camera, it would destroy their lens sales.

This is a great camera for wildlife as well since it can shoot in burst. Yes it is around $1698.00 but you will not need any extra lenses. This camera is perfect if you do not want to carry extra weight. It has a built in flash that is very strong.

I recommend that you check it out in a camera store or order one from someplace like B&H where you can return it if you do not like it. I have only touch on a few of its positive. The main downside of the camera is that there is a learning curve to lean how to use its menu.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1368989-REG/sony_cyber_shot_dsc_rx10_iv_digital.html

I hope that your health situation improves and that you have a great time in you travels.

Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak

Actually his second criteria is light weight. He spelled it “lightweight” so it could be overlooked. To be fair, light weight is fairly relative, depending on the gear. So I am assuming he’s not interested in a DSLR, but an M4/3 might fit the ticket or a camera such as the Sony A6xxx series, Nikon Z50 or Canon R6 might fit in his category. Probably full frame not so much.