Timmers wrote:
Yes, there are certain times when an image does not need to be 'sharp', see the two attached examples.
The pinhole image was a self portrait by a boy at a children's photo class. The camera was a Kodak 100 sheet box from a 4X5 inch three part film box, with a hole made by the point of a #10 sewing needle. The shutter was a piece of black photo tape. The 'film' was Ilford RC paper processed in a darkroom usin dilute B&W developer by visual inspection. The negative was then printed on B&W paper the next weekend by the young Hispanic boy.
What is so creative about the image is that he quietly watched the other children who would up end their box before closing the shutter on their camera, which would then steak an image of raw sun light from the sun across the paper. Several did this and were told to always close the shutter before they moved their camera.
This creative and brilliant youth then went off making some more portraits. When I saw the negative he had produced I asked how he did it, and he explained making his portrait and trying different ways of marking the sun as a burst striking his portrait in the head.
I took him out to find his parents and finding his father set him up with a summer scholarship to our children's summer art classes. I left him to explain what and why he had made his self portrait with his father (yes, I quickly dried his negative and made a print for him to take home to show his family.
Remember that any and all contact prints are ALL un-sharp. Yet an un-sharp mind and fuzzy thinking is the responsibility of out of focus thinking, and nothing will ever sharpen the mind for creative thought.
Yes, there are certain times when an image does no... (
show quote)
Proving my point.
No need to chase gear.