Original, or cropped?
Oct 22, 2023 20:03:18 #
Longshadow wrote:
Read some of the responses....
I must have skipped the first two.
Sorry if I was redundant.Oct 22, 2023 20:08:55 #
Muddyvalley wrote:
I must have skipped the first two. Sorry if I was redundant.
Sorry if I was redundant.Yes, they are two different pictures,
but that's not the point......
Oct 22, 2023 22:03:41 #
Reuss Griffiths
Loc: Ravenna, Ohio
AviRoad wrote:
I really had no idea that anyone might take this other than as humor.
It is funny and a clever double entendre. I might offer the observation that maybe the candles in some of our pumpkins aren't too bright.
Oct 22, 2023 22:40:04 #
Oct 23, 2023 01:39:29 #
Oct 23, 2023 05:25:03 #
AviRoad wrote:
I'm not sure which I prefer.
I prefer the original photo. It seems that the other version was over cropped. Sometimes the corner barber does the same. He won’t get a great tip!!
LOL!!
Oct 23, 2023 05:35:12 #
AviRoad wrote:
I'm not sure which I prefer.
Hey, this is really nice. It gave me a smile first thing this morning. And yes I see the humor too bad others don’t I guess they’re just too seriously full of themselves. Anyway, it’s a fun post. Thank you for sharing.
Bruce.
Oct 23, 2023 05:46:04 #
Oct 23, 2023 05:47:43 #
AviRoad wrote:
I'm not sure which I prefer.
Funny! Some got it and some were clueless. Oh well, you tried.
Oct 23, 2023 05:59:44 #
Canonuser
Loc: UK and South Africa
AviRoad wrote:
I really had no idea that anyone might take this other than as humor.
Don’t worry, they walk amongst us. I certainly found it humorous.
Oct 23, 2023 06:15:36 #
Oct 23, 2023 06:25:22 #
the difference between farmer-talk and photographer-talk...(actually a cross-over, or hybrid statement; farmers would have said, "Cropped field.")
Oct 23, 2023 06:59:38 #
ed3
Loc: Belton, MO
from a camera standpoint, very funny, I really enjoyed the humor. From a soil health standpoint neither one is very good. Although the first picture shows less of a problem. Neither one has live roots in the soil where photosynthesis is pumping nutrients into the microbes below, in the soil; 2/3rds of the biomass is in the soil not what we normally look at as living plants above the soil. Second picture is worse because it also shows bear ground, many more issues with bear-ground. Regenerative farming practices are attempting to correct the mistakes we have been making, thereby reducing the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere. A good read on the subject is a book "Dirt to Soil" by Gabe Brown.
Oct 23, 2023 07:00:49 #
ed3
Loc: Belton, MO
from a camera standpoint, very funny, I really enjoyed the humor. From a soil health standpoint neither one is very good. Although the first picture shows less of a problem. Neither one has live roots in the soil where photosynthesis is pumping nutrients into the microbes below, in the soil; 2/3rds of the biomass is in the soil not what we normally look at as living plants above the soil. Second picture is worse because it also shows bear ground, many more issues with bear-ground. Regenerative farming practices are attempting to correct the mistakes we have been making, thereby reducing the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere. A good read on the subject is a book "Dirt to Soil" by Gabe Brown.
Oct 23, 2023 07:01:43 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.