Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Annular solar eclipse and filters
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Oct 9, 2023 00:45:00   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
dbfalconer wrote:
I’ll contact them first thing. Thx.


Remember that you have at least one proper filter for the one camera. Ordering another filter at this time for another camera will be iffy at this time. Be sure to at least use the one you have if the other does not get there in time.

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 00:47:19   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
wdross wrote:
One of the three total eclipses I have been to ended up under the clouds. It still offers a different perspective but it is nothing like a total eclipse. Hopefully there will be a clear area close by so you can at least see your annular eclipse.

Also, you can see where all the eclipses of the world, including the USA, will occur using the NASA web site.


Good to know! It will be fun just to be there. I’m sure many will post on UHH soon after.

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 00:51:48   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
User ID wrote:
Likewise the full moon. The lighting and the "composition" are not of the photographers doing so who cares who shot whatever full moon pic is posted. Material proof that one can aim and focus a long lens isnt worth a second glance (really not even a first glance).

Blue moons and super moons are not visually distinct from any other moons, but dimbulbs anxiously seek advice about recording those "rare special events".


I guess that’s true, but for novices like me, it is fun trying to get the shot and improve those basic focusing skills.

Reply
 
 
Oct 9, 2023 01:03:55   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
bnsf wrote:
Oct 9th is Monday.


Yup. But I needed to order from them last week at latest. Leave for Cortez Tuesday. It’s all ok. Did practice shots. Sensor is fine. Thx.

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 09:33:42   #
Canisdirus
 
If you don't know how to instill your artistic skills into shooting the moon...then it won't seem to be a worthy subject to you.

But it can be for those with an artistic bent.



Reply
Oct 9, 2023 09:49:24   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Canisdirus wrote:
If you don't know how to instill your artistic skills into shooting the moon...then it won't seem to be a worthy subject to you.

But it can be for those with an artistic bent.

I also have seen moon after moon with no “artistic” effect. They also don’t seem like a worthy subject to me - same as a solar eclipse.

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 10:23:41   #
Canisdirus
 
rehess wrote:
I also have seen moon after moon with no “artistic” effect. They also don’t seem like a worthy subject to me - same as a solar eclipse.


Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Some can get more from their efforts than others.

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Oct 9, 2023 10:32:47   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
rehess wrote:
I also have seen moon after moon with no “artistic” effect. They also don’t seem like a worthy subject to me - same as a solar eclipse.


The moon and sun by themselves don't have much artistic value. It's more a challenge for you to try to capture the most detail or in the case of eclipses, the event. Something we don't see every day, tends to garner lots of attention. I consider the moon as one of the most challenging objects to get clear in focus detail. Annular and total solar eclipses are not just about a picture of the event, but also the experience, kinda like The Grand Canyon.

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 10:40:35   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
alberio wrote:
The moon and sun by themselves don't have much artistic value. It's more a challenge for you to try to capture the most detail or in the case of eclipses, the event. Something we don't see every day, tends to garner lots of attention. I consider the moon as one of the most challenging objects to get clear in focus detail. Annular and total solar eclipses are not just about a picture of the event, but also the experience, kinda like The Grand Canyon.

I photograph people who are experiencing the experience; NASA could have taken some of the photos we’ll be seeing in a few days {even here - not in the gallery where they belong}

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 11:17:15   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
Canisdirus wrote:
If you don't know how to instill your artistic skills into shooting the moon...then it won't seem to be a worthy subject to you.

But it can be for those with an artistic bent.


Stunning~ Inspirational! I'm too focused on the technical...want to be more creative! Thanks!

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 11:39:11   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
rehess wrote:
I also have seen moon after moon with no “artistic” effect. They also don’t seem like a worthy subject to me - same as a solar eclipse.


I do not always photograph the moon with artistic intentions. I often photograph the moon in order to be able to see and ponder that which can be difficult to see and ponder. There are also other things that I photograph because they are difficult to see...too small, too dark, too inaccessible...you get the idea. Many times, no one else ever sees these photographs. If they do, I do not care what they might think about them. I'd never share them here. Only with my PWC (People Who Care) circle.

One of the unfortunate things that has happened as a result of the internet and forums and social media sites is that we share too much stuff with too many people who really don't matter. Then when they happen not to like something, we get all bent out of shape over it.

If I show Taylor or Stephanie or Shelby or James or Linda a nice picture of the moon, it might not trigger against their deepest interests. But their response will never be, "That is the dumbest, most unartistic waste of time and energy I have ever seen." Instead, their response will be something more like, "Wow! Have you thought about what you could do with that? What if..."

One of my biggest complaints about this forum is the huge excess of pragmatism that tries to permeate it. I can't figure out for sure whether this pragmatism is real or fake. But either way, it is the antithesis of artistic endeavor. So I am also suspicious of whether comments around the relative "artisticness" of things is real or fake.

I believe that photographs of the moon and sun are as valid as any other photographs, even if they are 'only' snapshots or "fancy snapshots."

Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Oct 9, 2023 11:49:50   #
Machinedoc Loc: Yorktown Heights, NY
 

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 12:46:29   #
OldCADuser Loc: Irvine, CA
 
I'm planning on using a couple of ND 100000 filters, a 55mm and 67mm, on my two set-ups for this Saturday's annular eclipse. And yes, since these are actual 'Neutral Density' filters, so the resulting image of the Sun will be white.

For a much more in-depth discussion of this and other issues related to photographing the up-coming eclipses (the one next week and the total eclipse in April 2024), I've got another thread that you might be interested in:

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-785225-1.html

Reply
Oct 9, 2023 15:56:14   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
OldCADuser wrote:
I'm planning on using a couple of ND 100000 filters, a 55mm and 67mm, on my two set-ups for this Saturday's annular eclipse. And yes, since these are actual 'Neutral Density' filters, so the resulting image of the Sun will be white.

For a much more in-depth discussion of this and other issues related to photographing the up-coming eclipses (the one next week and the total eclipse in April 2024), I've got another thread that you might be interested in:

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-785225-1.html
I'm planning on using a couple of ND 100000 filter... (show quote)


Thanks very much! This forum has such helpful members.

Reply
Oct 16, 2023 10:39:45   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
dbfalconer wrote:
I am preparing to photograph the annular solar eclipse in Cortez, CO, next week. Plan to use Tamron 150-500 on Sony a6000. With a ICE ND100000 filter—16.5. Will this be adequate sensor protection? I will only use LCD screen, not look through eyepiece, so I do not understand if electronic viewfinder will be activated. ND use is not advised for optical viewfinders. The Sony is, of course, mirrorless. I just heard of ND1000000 (6 zeroes = 20), but could not obtain one now in time for the trip. Am hoping my brand new ICE ND100000 will do the job. The literature and sales sites have seemed contradictory and misleading. I am exhausted with researching this. Thanks.
I am preparing to photograph the annular solar ecl... (show quote)


To all the folks who chimed in with advice and encouragement for my solar eclipse shoot---I just wanted to post a couple of quick screenshots from our morning Oct 14 at Bisti Wilderness south of Farmington, NM. My friend Chuck Winter coached me through the process of shooting the annular solar eclipse and I'm very happy with my results. We enjoyed our road trip, which included a great tour at Mesa Verde and a visit to the "Aztec Ruins." Thanks for all the help! Now I'm eager for the April 8,2024 full eclipse!

I used my Sony a6000, Tamron 150-500mm, and ND100,000 (16.5).

Some of the sequence Annular solar eclipse
Some of the sequence  Annular solar eclipse...
(Download)

Full eclipse Bisti NM 10:34am Oct 14, 2023
Full eclipse  Bisti NM   10:34am  Oct 14, 2023...
(Download)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.