SuperflyTNT wrote:
While those stores can produce a better print than an HP All-in-one they are chemical process printers and can’t compare to a dedicated photo inkjet printer. The OP also should learn about calibrating his work environment, using specific profiles for his printer and the paper choice, and soft-proofing his images before printing. (And if you’re watching YouTube videos on soft-proofing, DO NOT WATCH Anthony Morganti’s video. I know some people really like his Lightroom tutorials, but when it comes to soft-proofing he has no clue)
While those stores can produce a better print than... (
show quote)
Nope, no chemicals, in most of the drug store chains.
Most have a Kodak or Fuji kiosk. You insert your memory card, edit the print for exposure, cropping, color, then you click print, and the inkjet printer inside the kiosk spits out the prints.
Even if they do use a chemical process, that is fine.
My advice was to print out one of his images, or one he likes on line, make a print in a store so he can go home, compare the results with what he is getting, and maybe that will help diagnose the issue.
Maybe he’s not adding enough or too much contrast, same with exposure adjustments, when editing.
Maybe it’s the paper choice, etc.
The point is to have a known good print in order to have something to strive for and compare to.
If the op is not going to do enough volume with a new printer, they can clog.
It would be good idea to make his prints at a kiosk to test the market, before investing in a photo printer, ink and paper. If he buys a quality (ie: costly) printer, and finds that his prints don’t sell, he’s out a lot of money.
If he does sell a decent amount, of the kiosk prints, then he can go, spend his money and make beautiful prints at home.
One step at a time.
And I wish him much luck with his chosen journey.