Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Question on changing from DSLR to Mirrorless for Landscape Photography (Nikon)
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
Oct 4, 2023 03:41:19   #
Randyfrieder Loc: Long Island, New York
 
ELNikkor wrote:
Since the sensors have the same res, if you use the same lenses, I would consider that an expensive sideways move. To really see any difference at all, you'd have to also get the Z lenses. I'm still very satisfied with my D750, but the Z8 with a Z 24-120 has been tempting me.


I switched from my D850, to the Z9, and the only Z mount lens I bought was the 24-120 f4 S.
As a wedding, event and live music ‘tog, I find that focal range is perfect for me.
The new 24-120 on the Z9, is better overall, than the previous 24-120 f4, F mount, on the D850.
I see a big improvement in my work, with the Z9. I use the ftz2 for my f mount trinity glass, specialty glass and big lenses. The ibis in the full frame Z bodies m akes all these lenses stabilized, whether they have VR or not. If they do have vr, they get the benefit from both systems.
I do indeed see a big difference in IQ, between the two bodies, the Z9 has made a big improvement.
Another advantage, is the absolute elimination of shutter sounds, and the mirror slap, making it easier to be discreet and have sharper images.
I can shoot without alerting or distracting my subjects, if so desired.
I gave the D850/grip to my son in law, because I knew that I would probably never use it again. It had become a third spare body. I kept the d810 with the grip, (because I didn’t need two 46mp bodies), just to be able to use my older D lenses, and I will eventually replace them with z glass, and add another Z9 body.
Since I got the Z9, I think I have used the d810 for only 3 photos.
Be aware, that there is a big learning curve, whenever you switch to a different type of camera.
I found that the Z9 took me a few extra days to “make it mine”, but after that, it has been a pleasure to work with.
If the money is available, and you are serious about your photography, I can recommend a Z8 or Z9, without any hesitation.
FTR: I waited until the Z8 was introduced, before I decided that the Z9 was the better camera for me. I never shoot without a grip, and having the grip inbuilt, makes for a better balanced body.
Also, the battery life is phenomenal. I can shoot 1600 shots, and still have 30-40% of the battery life left. The Z8 can’t use these more powerful batteries.
I never worried about battery life with the en-el18 batteries in the D850 grip.
And although I heard all the hype about bad battery life in the Z9, I don’t worry at all with the Z9 and a single en-el18d battery. Since I can use the same en-el18 batteries from my other gripped cameras, I have plenty of fire power available, and never had a need to use them. The newest battery, the en-el 18D does have a higher mah rating, so they do provide more shots per charge. But the older ones are just fine.
Ymmv
Imho
📸 Regards, Randy 📸

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 04:15:31   #
BandeauRouge Loc: usa
 
ELNikkor wrote:
Since the sensors have the same res, if you use the same lenses, I would consider that an expensive sideways move. To really see any difference at all, you'd have to also get the Z lenses. I'm still very satisfied with my D750, but the Z8 with a Z 24-120 has been tempting me.


I once did the math, and i believe it came out to be z8 is 4,000. z9 is 5,500.

D850 brand new per Nikon website, 2800.

850 gives you 7 fps but z8 gives you 20 raw fps... interesting but not exactly worth the cost.

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 05:00:34   #
cmc4214 Loc: S.W. Pennsylvania
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You can never reach the future by looking into mirrors.


Not true! there is no way what I see in the mirror is me now...MUST be the future

Reply
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Oct 4, 2023 06:25:12   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
larryepage wrote:
David--I shoot a D850, along with a D810 and D500. After being disappointed by the Z 7/Z 7ii and shut out by the entry cost to the Z 9 (very close to $8-9000 or even a little more), I decided to just sit back and wait for a while. When the Z 8 rumors started, it seemed that a viable path to a Nikon mirrorless system worth migrating to (or at least adding) might be on the horizon.

As factual data became available, my excitement grew, and I went so far as to assemble just under $7000 in an envelope. That's about what is needed to pay for a camera, a decent amount if memory, grip, extra battery, adaptor and lens. And it would be a camera that shared an operating system with my D850, which I definitely planned to keep. The Z 8 does not include some of the cool functions that I routinely use on my D850, and it won't fully utilize my array of highly useful AF-D lenses, which don't have focus motors.

In the meantime, I took my D850 out shooting three or four times. It reminded me of everything it can do and how well it can do it. In the course of those outings, it also made a case for how silly it would be to spend $7000 for a Z 8 or any other camera when I already own three incredibly capable cameras.

For now, the money has gone back in the drawer. It will be a travel and emergency fund. I'm having renewed fun shooting three different cameras that are incredibly more advanced than I could have even imagined ten years ago. The mirrors have never caused me even a hint of a problem. Nor do I expect that they ever will.
David--I shoot a D850, along with a D810 and D500.... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 4, 2023 06:35:33   #
cmceagle
 
gunflint wrote:
Hello,

This question is for Nikon Mirrorless users...I have been using the D850 since it came out. I am primarily a landscape photographer (not professional) and do some wildlife. I understand the various advantages the mirrorless cameras have for wildlife but am not clear on if there are advantages for landscape photography. I am considering the Z8 so I would appreciate any information you can share with me.

A second part...is there any quality loss or problem if I continue to use my current Nikon lenses with the adapter for the Z cameras?

Thank you so much, and if this has already been discussed I appologize.

David
Hello, br br This question is for Nikon Mirrorles... (show quote)


I enjoy the comments and offer a perspective from my experience with Canon. You get an increasing percentage of good shots with increasing experience and knowledge of your camera systems. I used a 7DMkII for six years and had great muscle memory using the button driven camera.. Switching to the R7 mirrorless presented a completely different menu/touch screen managed system. I’m still on the learning curve with the R7 and how to compensate for the differences, some negative, using the camera for BIF. My point though is that after using the R7 for six months, I went back to the DLSR and had forgotten how to quickly use the button controls. While I don’t know the differences between the Nikon DLSR and mirrorless camera controls, I suspect that you will not be able to go back without a loss of proficiency.

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 06:43:10   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
BandeauRouge wrote:
I once did the math, and i believe it came out to be z8 is 4,000. z9 is 5,500.

D850 brand new per Nikon website, 2800.

850 gives you 7 fps but z8 gives you 20 raw fps... interesting but not exactly worth the cost.


Problem is, you can't make the switch by just buying a camera. To gain the performance you list requires at the very least a very large CF Express Type B that you probably were not using in your D850. That plus a lens adaptor will be close to $750. It would not surprise me to learn that F mount lenses (or at least some of them) will not support full 20 fps shooting. They were never designed to work at that rate, and even if they do "work," they may not last very long doing so. Prices for a native lens vary, but all are more expensive than their F mount equivalents.. some by a lot. I need a battery grip. The grip for the Z 8 is a design that I don't prefer (not quick and easy to install and remove) and represents another substantial expenditure. I buy my cameras locally, so sales tax is added to each item.

So no, I do not believe that one can start shooting a Z 8 for $4000.

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 07:01:47   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
I happily used a D3S and D800E for many years but would never switch back to a DSLR after purchasing my Z7ii. The Z lenses are superb and the ability to see a preview of my shot prior to pressing the shutter button was worth the price of admission all by itself.

Also, all development is now focused on Nikon's mirrorless lineup of cameras.

Reply
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Oct 4, 2023 07:07:33   #
A. T.
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
David, you know the UHH community is mostly populated with a bunch of retirees with more time and money than sense, right? Keeping up with this bunch of Joneses is a fool's errand. I had a look at Rockwell's Z8 review. Lots of great technology, and a lot of weaknesses vs the top two in the mirrorless camera market, Canon and Sony.

If you let the UHH community spend your money, nothing you have will ever be good enough to their standards. Digital cameras are plenty good enough now, especially anything released since the resolution standard reached 24MP across the industry, well below your D850. Buying another $4000 camera (or several), and even more new lenses, is well within the means of much of the UHH community. Only you can decide if that's the best idea for you.
David, you know the UHH community is mostly popula... (show quote)


GREAT response.

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 07:24:53   #
riderxlx Loc: DFW area Texas
 
gunflint wrote:
Hello,

This question is for Nikon Mirrorless users...I have been using the D850 since it came out. I am primarily a landscape photographer (not professional) and do some wildlife. I understand the various advantages the mirrorless cameras have for wildlife but am not clear on if there are advantages for landscape photography. I am considering the Z8 so I would appreciate any information you can share with me.

A second part...is there any quality loss or problem if I continue to use my current Nikon lenses with the adapter for the Z cameras?

Thank you so much, and if this has already been discussed I appologize.

David
Hello, br br This question is for Nikon Mirrorles... (show quote)


Why?
Bruce.

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 08:28:38   #
mrozzoo Loc: Illinois
 
my side of the story..... I have been a retired full-time photographer for 45+ years... I too said "no mirrorless"... I'm done. long live DSLRs.

Having owned most DSLRs that were made...My last DSLRs were 3-D500s body the trinity of lenses and 2-D850s.

I decided to downsize even though I still do side gigs and pleasure shoots. So I sold my D500s and my 200-500mm lens. I did replace the 200-500 with a 500mm pf. Again long live DSLRs.

Then becoming more interested and hearing others' stories.... I told myself if I sold my D850/w grip I'd purchase a Z8, Which was sold fast, and purchased the Z8 and FTZII plus a used like new 24-120mm Z lens. I'll keep the last D850 for backup.

I Fell in love with it and brought my interest and life back into my photography... 3D focus, eye tracking, pre-capture fast, quiet.... all the above and more.

Then Nikon had a recall.... hummmmm... when I purchased my Niko D810 back in its day, it too had a recall... and that camera is still working perfectly for my friend who owns it now. So the recall didn't bother me as much as a brief setback. 9 days.

My FTZ adapter was on backorder... when I got the call to pick it up. I was waiting in line and behind another photographer... his main camera just went down. He was there to purchase a Nikon D850.

I said I had one that I was considering selling. We chatted and three hours later... SOLD. Now first time in my career I only own one camera body. What happens when I send in my Z8 for the recall repair? So... my brains and cash dribbled out. I purchased a Z6II w/50mm 1.8 as my backup. So when I recoup... the 180-600mm may be next if I sell the 500mm PF.

And yes I'm happier.... just to be able to look into the viewfinder to see your image in the bright sun is reason enough.

There is a learning curve for sure.... but it's like getting a new computer to set up or a new car the figure out.

EXCITING TIMES.

Remember... "the clock stops for no one"

do what you want and can, ASAP... tick tick tick...

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 09:47:38   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
I'm sure I missed probably several others.[/quote]

Thank you for this useful summary. And yes, I'll hang onto my D850.

Reply
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Oct 4, 2023 10:21:55   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
Is there an actual quality difference in the photos taken by a quality DSLR versus a mirrorless or is it all about one technology versus another? Assume the photographer is of the highest quality.

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 10:49:29   #
Randyfrieder Loc: Long Island, New York
 
850 gives you 7 fps but z8 gives you 20 raw fps... interesting but not exactly worth the cost.[/quote]

That is just one of the many advantages of the Z9 over the D850.

Trust that there are so many others

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 11:03:52   #
Randyfrieder Loc: Long Island, New York
 
Regarding going back to a dslr,
after using a mirrorless camera, I had the same experience. I had stopped using my D850 and D810, when I got the Z9.
A few days ago, I picked up the D810, which I used for years, and is now just a second body, I kept it to use the few D lenses, that I still have, but it seemed so foreign to me.
All the buttons were in the wrong place!
And, I couldn’t see all the same information in the viewfinder.
There is such a big generational difference, and I personally think that it is a huge improvement to the user experience.
The ability to remap almost every button, is time saving and has allowed me to grab images that I couldn’t before.
Since I don’t plan on going backwards, eventually I will sell the D810 (I gave the D850 to my son in law) and get another Z9.
FTR: I was one of the holdouts.
I “was sure” that the new camera would not make that much of a difference.
I was very wrong.

I wish I had purchased the Z9 earlier, but I waited until the Z8 was released, and made the decision that the 9 was much better suited to my needs than the 8.
Ymmv
IMHO
📸 Regards, Randy 📸

Reply
Oct 4, 2023 11:51:45   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
gvarner wrote:
Is there an actual quality difference in the photos taken by a quality DSLR versus a mirrorless or is it all about one technology versus another? Assume the photographer is of the highest quality.


The mirrorless if the latest versions do out perform DSLRs.
I went from a DSLR to mirrorless and even my wife who is usually happy with cell phone shots commented how much better the new mirrorless is and greater looking depth in the photos.
Of course I don't buy the latest cameras every moment a new one comes out but any DSLR older than 5-6 years old (Date of introduction, not purchase date) will be outclassed by Mirrorless cameras introduced in the past 1-2 years.
Technology has moved on that much.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.