Bidenomics Positivity vs. Trumpolitics The Sky is Falling (Page 3): Delete...

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

DaveO wrote:

Hmmm, so you want to change the subject from the o... (show quote)

Delete

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

DaveO wrote:

Hmmm, so you want to change the subject from the o... (show quote)

Don’t try to argue/debate anyone whose last resort is asking you prove a negative .
“””… why is Biden not part of the problem.”””

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

btbg wrote:

I didn't think you could explain either the high p... (show quote)

You're boring me. The topic we're arguing is my response on this thread and nothing else. Your interpretation of my political preferences has nothing to do with anything. Are you really this dense? Are you just trolling for social interaction?

Pitiful that you insist on not informing yourself and instead you attack me. Why do you continue to prove my point? By the way, the so called respect of morons like you means nothing. Any who can't be bothered to verify factual information and instead continue with deflections, attacks and political innuendo is worthless.

You're out of gas, Ignorant One.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

DennyT wrote:

Don’t try to argue/debate anyone whose last resort is asking you prove a negative .
“””… why is Biden not part of the problem.”””

LOL, he is just being his usual uninformed pile of bs and choking on his political inhibitions.

He sounds like Den-Den has been blowing in his ear!

btbg

DaveO wrote:

You're boring me. The topic we're arguing is my r... (show quote)

I offered the chance for you to enlighten me. You chose not to. Triple g went to the trouble to try to.

If you look at his links the problem started with how the world handled covid which I already stated. Where he disagrees with me is that he believes that the global market forces coupled with the war in Ukraine have caused the problem rather than Biden. My contention is tje war in Ukraine would not have happened vut for the incompetence of Biden. And although 3g is correct that the oil leases that the Biden administration have either not put up for sale or have canceled would not be producing yet Biden has struck an anti oil response that is hurting development.

Example although canceling Keystome has done nothing to decrease current production or distribution it has sent a clear message to investors not to invest as government may cancel your project after you have already spent your money but before you can get a return on your investment
.

Truly bad policy.

Tex-s

ArtzDarkroom wrote:

Yeah, but that's not what I'm saying. His message is always optimistic. I wasn't talking about the results you dislike.

I have to be misreading your posts. You seem to be lauding optimistic messaging over positive results. Biden SAYS optimistic things about the economy and delivers dismal results. Trump has been pessimistic in he is messaging, but prior to Covid, delivered almost unilaterally positive results i the economy. Blacks, for example had the best statistics in employment, income, education and other economic markers since the state have been measured.

Triple G

btbg wrote:

I offered the chance for you to enlighten me. You ... (show quote)

Those aren't represented as my opinions. but experts' opinions. It's not as much cause and effect as you state. Record production absolutely shuts down your assertion.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/sep/12/us-pace-record-oil-production-despite-bidens-green/

btbg

Triple G wrote:

Those aren't represented as my opinions. but experts' opinions. It's not as much cause and effect as you state. Record production absolutely shuts down your assertion.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/sep/12/us-pace-record-oil-production-despite-bidens-green/

Notice the headline says despite. We would have more production without the Biden administration and their incompetence.

Triple G

btbg wrote:

Notice the headline says despite. We would have more production without the Biden administration and their incompetence.

You are operating on conjecture, emotion and political bias; not facts and accumulated reports by oil companies.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2022/06/17/how-has-the-oil-industry-fared-under-president-biden/?sh=44b02e603890

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/09/business/oil-production-biden-trump

btbg

Triple G wrote:

You are operating on conjecture, emotion and political bias; not facts and accumulated reports by oil companies.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2022/06/17/how-has-the-oil-industry-fared-under-president-biden/?sh=44b02e603890

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/09/business/oil-production-biden-trump

Not really. Who was more friendly to big oil, Biden or Trump. No question ot was Trump.

Which president did Putin attack someone under and which did he not. Putin has started wars when Obama and Biden have been president but not when Trump was. None of that is conjecture.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

ArtzDarkroom wrote:

Yeah, but that's not what I'm saying. His message is always optimistic. I wasn't talking about the results you dislike.

Yeah, but remember Biden is the consummate liar, he drove the economy over a cliff and now he lies to tell you how great he is doing, seems to me Art that you would have figured this out by now.

ArtzDarkroom Loc: Near Disneyland-Orange County, California

Blurryeyed wrote:

Yeah, but remember Biden is the consummate liar, he drove the economy over a cliff and now he lies to tell you how great he is doing, seems to me Art that you would have figured this out by now.

You assume I haven't.
You must understand that I am only referring to the style of delivery which is different between the two of them (Biden, Trump). One appeals to the hopeful optimist, the other to those that believe they are victims of a failed society.

One could argue fact differences and how they came to choose one Party over the other, but a LONG time ago, a professor pointed out that most people vote the same way their parents do.

Triple G

btbg wrote:

Not really. Who was more friendly to big oil, Biden or Trump. No question ot was Trump.

Which president did Putin attack someone under and which did he not. Putin has started wars when Obama and Biden have been president but not when Trump was. None of that is conjecture.

Why should a president be friendly to big oil, big pharma, big auto mfg, etc.? Are you sure you are not a communist? You've run out of cogent arguments against Biden policies so now you begin spouting knee jerk political talking points.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

btbg wrote:

Not really. Who was more friendly to big oil, Biden or Trump. No question ot was Trump.

Which president did Putin attack someone under and which did he not. Putin has started wars when Obama and Biden have been president but not when Trump was. None of that is conjecture.

Boy o . Something to proud of “ friendly to big oil”” !!!!

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

btbg wrote:

I offered the chance for you to enlighten me. You ... (show quote)

I offered you a chance to broaden your knowledge by using your computer and you opt to remain wrapped up with your politically motivated misconceptions.

Best wishes...