Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Kodak
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Sep 4, 2023 21:11:45   #
Paul Moshay Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
WOW, you are the champ Nikon collector! There are some great ones there, enjoy!

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 21:12:25   #
ruzbynik Loc: Victoria BC
 
spaceytracey wrote:
I agree, mostly. I do miss the darkroom with the lovely chemical smells. Some definitel skills were needed to get just the print you wanted. Will not go back though. Still have a Pentax 6X7 If I ever get the urge to shoot film again though. W/not be developing it myself.


The darkroom smells, I can do without, but the Pentax 6x7 was my favorite. The Shutter sound could be heard a block away, so not a stealthy beast.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 22:11:27   #
baer
 
Thanks very much for your comment! I use a lot of film along with digital. For film I use a 4x5 speed grafted, a medium format fuji rangefinder, and for 35 mm my old Nikon Fan and a Nikkormat (both in mint condition). for Digital I use a D500. I just got a Durst enlarger and darkroom accoutrements that I need to set up a home darkroom.

Perhaps we could talk or meet sometime. I can be reached at my office voicemail at (personal info removed), 1 or by texting me at (personal info removed).
Thanks,
Baer

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2023 05:54:13   #
Randyfrieder Loc: Long Island, New York
 
RodeoMan wrote:
I really like your mini museum. Did you have a favorite film camera?


Yes, I do have a few favorites.
The f100 and f5 were my last used 35mm film cameras, and they just felt “right” to me. I actually favored the f100 over the f5.
I bought my first camera, when I was 12, (1970) a nikkormat FTn. I have such fond memories of using that camera and working in the darkroom, all through my elementary school years
And at 18, when I started to shoot weddings and bar/bat mitzvah’s, I bought 2 Hasselblads, because the studio I worked for, required them.
I used those two hassy’s for almost 10 years, with big Tony Armato brackets, and Metz flashes, before we all started shooting events on 35mm, and then digital.
They are on display, along with a Bronica sq-a, in my living room, as well.
But, in reality, I have used every one of the cameras on display, and I enjoyed using each and every one of them, at the time.
What is impressive, is that each and every camera still works perfectly, a testament to how well they were made.
These days, I shoot with a z9 and D850. And I know that in only 20 years, more or less, they will be worthless paperweights, the software won’t be updated, and the electronics will eventually fail, batteries won’t be made, etc.
but the film cameras will still most likely continue to work, but who knows if film will still be available??
But,
Whatever is next,
I am ready and excited for it!!

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 06:05:05   #
Randyfrieder Loc: Long Island, New York
 
GeneG wrote:
My first "camera" was a fake that I acquired at the 1939-40 NY World Fair. It had a bit of film attached to the inside of a wooden box and a bit of glass in front, with a shutter. But it got me interested in photography, and my parents gave me a "real" camera - a plastic box shaped like a Leica, with 2 speeds ("Instant" and "Bulb") that
helped me learn a little about things like exposure. My first REAL camera was a Kodak Brownie Reflex with a flashbulb attachment, that I received when I graduated from 6th grade. That led to a lifelong hobby and a series of increasingly better equipment. I agree that digital processing is much more convenient than film processing, and a little easier for me as I approach the age of 95.
My first "camera" was a fake that I acqu... (show quote)


Wow, almost 95!!!
That’s impressive and enviable. I hope that 30 years from now I am still alive, and still shooting people!!!
(I tell my clients, that “I shoot people for a living, and if I don’t like them, I cut their heads off!!! And, if I do like them, I take them home and “blow them up”!)

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 06:32:01   #
whfowle Loc: Tampa first, now Albuquerque
 
My photography journey began with the family Brownie box 616 during the 50's. In those days, I wanted to get a Kodak Retina III but could not afford one. Waited until I had some money of my own while in the service overseas and bought my first Nikon F. I still use that camera.

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 06:42:38   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
cliff Hilbert wrote:
On this day in 1888 George Eastman received a patent for his roll-film box camera, and registered his trademark:“Kodak”.


For those who like a good read, try “Making Kodak Film,” by Robert L. Shanebrook.

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2023 06:47:06   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Randyfrieder wrote:
Yes, I do have a few favorites.
The f100 and f5 were my last used 35mm film cameras, and they just felt “right” to me. I actually favored the f100 over the f5.
I bought my first camera, when I was 12, (1970) a nikkormat FTn. I have such fond memories of using that camera and working in the darkroom, all through my elementary school years
And at 18, when I started to shoot weddings and bar/bat mitzvah’s, I bought 2 Hasselblads, because the studio I worked for, required them.
I used those two hassy’s for almost 10 years, with big Tony Armato brackets, and Metz flashes, before we all started shooting events on 35mm, and then digital.
They are on display, along with a Bronica sq-a, in my living room, as well.
But, in reality, I have used every one of the cameras on display, and I enjoyed using each and every one of them, at the time.
What is impressive, is that each and every camera still works perfectly, a testament to how well they were made.
These days, I shoot with a z9 and D850. And I know that in only 20 years, more or less, they will be worthless paperweights, the software won’t be updated, and the electronics will eventually fail, batteries won’t be made, etc.
but the film cameras will still most likely continue to work, but who knows if film will still be available??
But,
Whatever is next,
I am ready and excited for it!!
Yes, I do have a few favorites. br The f100 and f... (show quote)

I began with several Kodak cameras, and ‘graduated’ to 35mm rangefinders only when I began Grad School, then SLRs only about the time I finished Grad School.

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 07:58:04   #
clemente21
 
And if you are in the Rochester N.Y. area, don't miss the Eastman Museum and Mansion.
https://www.eastman.org/

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 08:08:40   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
cliff Hilbert wrote:
On this day in 1888 George Eastman received a patent for his roll-film box camera, and registered his trademark:“Kodak”.


A great day for all!

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 09:11:40   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
Randyfrieder wrote:
Wow, almost 95!!!
That’s impressive and enviable. I hope that 30 years from now I am still alive, and still shooting people!!!
(I tell my clients, that “I shoot people for a living, and if I don’t like them, I cut their heads off!!! And, if I do like them, I take them home and “blow them up”!)



Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2023 09:14:48   #
profbowman Loc: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
 
jerryc41 wrote:
A great day for all!


It is hard to believe that Eastman began with the more inexpensive cameras that long ago. Thanks to all for the memories this thread has brought to the fore for me. --Richard

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 10:05:08   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
profbowman wrote:
It is hard to believe that Eastman began with the more inexpensive cameras that long ago. Thanks to all for the memories this thread has brought to the fore for me. --Richard

Kodak cameras always were ‘cheap’ - no aperture adjustment {typically set at the equiv of F/16 in 35mm}, other than very close ‘in focus’, no shutter speed adjustment, expecting ‘latitude’ to take care of ISO.

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 13:58:12   #
BE KIND
 
I'm 77 and have similarly fond memories of the film days but I gotta tell ya, digital cameras, editing software, and printers are absolutely awesome and fun to work with. IMO, it's hard to make a bad photo with today's technology...unless one is totally inept.

Reply
Sep 5, 2023 14:17:20   #
RodeoMan Loc: St Joseph, Missouri
 
Randyfrieder wrote:
Yes, I do have a few favorites.
The f100 and f5 were my last used 35mm film cameras, and they just felt “right” to me. I actually favored the f100 over the f5.
I bought my first camera, when I was 12, (1970) a nikkormat FTn. I have such fond memories of using that camera and working in the darkroom, all through my elementary school years
And at 18, when I started to shoot weddings and bar/bat mitzvah’s, I bought 2 Hasselblads, because the studio I worked for, required them.
I used those two hassy’s for almost 10 years, with big Tony Armato brackets, and Metz flashes, before we all started shooting events on 35mm, and then digital.
They are on display, along with a Bronica sq-a, in my living room, as well.
But, in reality, I have used every one of the cameras on display, and I enjoyed using each and every one of them, at the time.
What is impressive, is that each and every camera still works perfectly, a testament to how well they were made.
These days, I shoot with a z9 and D850. And I know that in only 20 years, more or less, they will be worthless paperweights, the software won’t be updated, and the electronics will eventually fail, batteries won’t be made, etc.
but the film cameras will still most likely continue to work, but who knows if film will still be available??
But,
Whatever is next,
I am ready and excited for it!!
Yes, I do have a few favorites. br The f100 and f... (show quote)


I'd have a great time nosing around your collection. I imagine you have examples of images from many, if not most of your cameras. You are right about the old film cameras continuing to work. You didn't buy a camera back then and immediately start wondering what would be the first glitch or even when the first update would be coming down the pike. As a regular reader this forum you have seen time and time again where someone has written that they have this or that model of a digital camera and this or that function is on the "fritz" and please help them. Either that or they have got themselves into a setting they can't get out of. I am sure that there would have been problems with the film cameras that folks would have posted had the "hog" existed back in those times, but not nearly as many. Thanks for a great post.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.