Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Contests, Challenges, Periodicals
You're welcome to post all of your 'Super Blue Moon' shots...
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Sep 3, 2023 13:49:34   #
nervous2 Loc: Provo, Utah
 

Reply
Sep 3, 2023 13:51:27   #
nervous2 Loc: Provo, Utah
 
I like this one a lot!

Reply
Sep 3, 2023 14:35:01   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
alberio wrote:
Every one is excellent.


Thak you.

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2023 15:30:58   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
dbfalconer wrote:
I am an amateur and don't know if these are any good or not! I'd welcome feedback and suggestions. All taken with Sony a7iii and Tamron 150-500mm on tripod with wire remote. From my patio in Salida, Colorado.

Note dates on photos: I think the best one is from Aug 2, an earlier super moon. One is from Aug 31 in the morning, as the moon was setting. I know the moon is blown out in 2 shots. I do minimal editing in Luminar 4 (no Lightroom). I don't focus stack or combine photos. I have not figured out masking yet. I had trouble focusing on Aug 31 at night. I think DSC1408(2) is too dark and over-processed with too much detail... Thanks for looking!
I am an amateur and don't know if these are any go... (show quote)


I like the morning shot of the moon setting behind the mountain. Maybe turn the highlights down a bit to bring out some lunar detail.

Reply
Sep 3, 2023 20:43:04   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
alberio wrote:
I like the morning shot of the moon setting behind the mountain. Maybe turn the highlights down a bit to bring out some lunar detail.


Ok. Thanks! The moon sure dropped quickly. I’ll play with the files some more.

Reply
Sep 3, 2023 22:52:38   #
OldCADuser Loc: Irvine, CA
 
Note that I've ordered an H-Alpha Emission 656nm Narrow Band Pass filter for future shots of the Moon. This filter is designed to only allow a narrow band of light to pass making any astronomic photo much better as it blocks the background light from the sun. In the case of shots of the Moon, it's supposed to enhance contrast, and in the case of photos of the Sun, it allows you to see through the photosphere giving you a view of the actual surface of the Sun and not just the corona.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 00:49:14   #
kb6kgx Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
Nikon D7200; 200-500mm f5.6 @ 500mm
ISO 400, 1/800, f10
Location: Simi Valley, CA


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2023 08:00:51   #
mscott842
 
This one taken in West Los Angeles. Nikon 800D with 500mm PF and 1.4 extender. Original photo, not composite. I was distracted for a moment after taking shots of the Blue moon and barely noticed silhouette of plane crossing through frame. I saw another plane inbound, far away on same flight path and wondered what are chances it will cross moon at same spot as earlier plane? I figured no way given its distance and precise trajectory required. But I waited to see if it would come close and surprisingly it passed exactly where previous plane had crossed. I got three shots off, the middle one attached.



Reply
Sep 4, 2023 09:15:16   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
kb6kgx wrote:
Nikon D7200; 200-500mm f5.6 @ 500mm
ISO 400, 1/800, f10
Location: Simi Valley, CA


Very. Nice. Thanks for posting settings too.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 09:17:13   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
mscott842 wrote:
This one taken in West Los Angeles. Nikon 800D with 500mm PF and 1.4 extender. Original photo, not composite. I was distracted for a moment after taking shots of the Blue moon and barely noticed silhouette of plane crossing through frame. I saw another plane inbound, far away on same flight path and wondered what are chances it will cross moon at same spot as earlier plane? I figured no way given its distance and precise trajectory required. But I waited to see if it would come close and surprisingly it passed exactly where previous plane had crossed. I got three shots off, the middle one attached.
This one taken in West Los Angeles. Nikon 800D wit... (show quote)


Great shot! You were ready! Right place, right time.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 11:16:13   #
Traveller_Jeff
 
These shots' details are amazing! Please tell us the camera, lens, and post processing you used for this series. I don't think I've ever seen so much crater detail in moon shots. Your optics are really outstanding.

Jeff

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2023 12:36:46   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
Traveller_Jeff wrote:
These shots' details are amazing! Please tell us the camera, lens, and post processing you used for this series. I don't think I've ever seen so much crater detail in moon shots. Your optics are really outstanding.

Jeff


You need to click on quote reply so we know who you are referring to

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 13:07:47   #
mscott842
 
Shot at ISO 160, 1/320, F8, at 700mm (500mm pf telephoto w/1.4 extender). Color balance set at 4600k. I shot a few dozen shots experimenting with moon settings prior and I liked this WB setting. All I did was brighten the image slightly in post.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 13:55:31   #
kb6kgx Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
dbfalconer wrote:
Very. Nice. Thanks for posting settings too.


Sure. I know that we all like to know what settings were used. It helps us to make OUR photos better.

Reply
Sep 4, 2023 14:17:49   #
mscott842
 
Forgot to mention - Shot raw with Nikon D800 and Nikkor 500mm.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Contests, Challenges, Periodicals
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.