Longshadow wrote:
I found this for Facebook:
"When you share a photo on Facebook the EXIF location data is automatically removed from the photo before it's included in the post, which is good news for many adoptive parents."
However, Facebook may use your photo for whatever purpose they wish:
"When you share, post, or upload content that is covered by intellectual property rights (like photos or videos) on or in connection with our Service, you hereby grant to us a non-exclusive, royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide license to host, use, distribute, modify, run, copy, publicly perform or display, translate, and create derivative works of your content (consistent with your privacy and application settings)."
There are ways to remove the metadata in properties, some data would need a software program to remove it. Google: how to strip exif data from images
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
My basic rule: Do not put anythg online that you do not want to share. It is simply like that! Other than that, disable the GPS on your camera- you know where the images were made- who else needs to know?
Wrong. GPS data is (at least to me) a very valuable piece of information. Rather, delete the info from a picture itself before you post it.
Curmudgeon wrote:
I don't have any reason to believe Facebook. Strip all data from all photos before posting to any site, even this one
Are you really in s.e. Arizona? I agree with what you're saying.
If you want to take and post images of children’s genitalia, the GPS coordinates will be quite useful to law enforcement, along with your copyright, IP address and username.
wow did this thread go way off course.
home brewer wrote:
In this crazy world are my concerns justified. It seems to me that if I post downloadable photos of very pretty grand children they could end up anywhere. MY EXIF data shows latitude and longitude thus people know exactly where I took the shot.
As others say do not put GPS information on your posted photos.
As to downloading, anything posted can be downloaded no matter what you do.
Why would anyone want to post "public photos" such as those in the first place?
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
home brewer wrote:
wow did this thread go way off course.
Actually I found it stimulating in a nasty but, OH SO GOOD way.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
KindaSpikey wrote:
Why would anyone want to post "public photos" such as those in the first place?
Because we live in a new age of sharing. Young folks see nothing wrong with it.
Longshadow wrote:
I also found this:
"Let's start with the most popular places to share images on the web. Imgur, Facebook and Instagram all scrub all metadata from photos upon upload. You don't have to worry about leaking metadata when uploading images to these sites."
It's easy to check, upload an image containing the metadata, then download it and see if the metadata exists in the download.
They may scrub all the data but they still have it.
omoore3 wrote:
This is an important question/issue. In the old days we used to take cute children's pictures in the bathtub. This week, we received an email from a niece with a picture of their 5 -year old son and 3-year old daughter lying together on their backs in the tub. Their genitalia was clearly visible. This picture was posted on their family Facebook page. It is my belief that this picture should not be publicly posted. I worry that the picture could get them in trouble violating child pornography laws. Does anyone know the law?
This is an important question/issue. In the old da... (
show quote)
Then your niece is just plain dumb!
Robertl594
Loc: Bloomfield Hills, Michigan and Nantucket
Times have changed. My wife won’t let me take pictures of children. And I do understand why. When I do, I get the permission of the parents first, then if they give me permission, I send them parents the photos. If there is one I want to post, I ask if it’s ok first. I never argue with them. If they say no, I gracefully say I understand and walk away.
Have to be careful these days. The last thing I want to do is offend someone or be inappropriate.
Back in 2000, I took a photo of my own daughter playing in a fountain in South Africa. The image won AOL photo of the year by a long shot. There were some people who thought it was child porn. I did not defend myself, I let the community do it for me. It was obviously not child porn, but some people are just a little crazy.
home brewer wrote:
In this crazy world are my concerns justified. It seems to me that if I post downloadable photos of very pretty grand children they could end up anywhere. MY EXIF data shows latitude and longitude thus people know exactly where I took the shot.
Some post-processing applications allow you to edit or remove metadata before you export the finished image.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.