Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Tyranny
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
Jul 9, 2023 10:09:41   #
paulrph1 Loc: Washington, Utah
 
Kraken wrote:
I am not so sure anyone wants to find a cure for the common

cold or even a simple early-warning blood test for cancer. The loss of

cancer donations and selling cold remedies would be devastating to the

pharmaceutical companies.


As of current there are no antiviral drugs, hence no cure for the common colds, flu, etc. Viruses are in a completely different field from bacteria. So it is hard get a cure. The best cure is natural immunity where we get exposure and build our own immunity.
The loss of

cancer donations and selling cold remedies would be devastating to the

pharmaceutical companies. As would be the monies made off of vaccines. 5 new billionaires were formed.

Reply
Jul 9, 2023 15:17:31   #
National Park
 
Sirsnapalot wrote:
I’ve have had all three of the Covid shots, what I’m saying is that the mandate is ridiculous since it will not eliminate Covid, how does someone loosing there job protect you or me? It will only lead to crippling the economy!


The threat of losing a job causes more people to get vaccinated, which reduces the spread of the disease, which protects you and me.

Reply
Jul 9, 2023 15:21:26   #
National Park
 
OldSchool-WI wrote:
This issue separates the POLITICAL SPECTRUM. The right wing and libertarians criticize the lockdowns and the multiple jabs as much worse than allowing natural immunity and letting the pandemic expire on its own and the left wing in politics insists on masks, distances, all the jabs and closures including schools. If one reads the responses on this thread you can see which political persuasion the respondents hold. But the codgers on UHH should be more cautious andyway. As for the Canadians and Ausies---they are socialists so pushing people around is ingrained. But maybe they smile and joke with you while they do it? I suggest people read the blockbuster book by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on the topic and the history of vaccines. "This ain't you grandfather's smallpox jab!"-----ew
This issue separates the POLITICAL SPECTRUM. The ... (show quote)


Kennedy's book is trash. He cites people totally out of context and fails to even mention the numerous studies that don't support his theories. His father and uncle must be turning over in their graves.

Reply
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Jul 9, 2023 16:40:49   #
paulrph1 Loc: Washington, Utah
 
National Park wrote:
The threat of losing a job causes more people to get vaccinated, which reduces the spread of the disease, which protects you and me.


It is the fear of the disease.

Reply
Jul 10, 2023 00:32:38   #
btbg
 
StanMac wrote:
1 in 4 sounds like a reasonable number. I’m just guessing, but you would probably find a similar number in a significant number of countries that have been hard hit by any pandemic that could be mitigated by a vaccine. Here in the U.S. in many localities, we still jail people who use an innocuous weed that does no harm to anyone but the user. Why not jail people who could, most likely eventually would, be a vector for transmitting a deadly disease?

We all got on board about innoculating or vaccinating entire generations of people to eliminate smallpox, measles, and other diseases that were highly transmissible and could be deadly. Why not COVID?

Let the vilification begin . . .

Stan
1 in 4 sounds like a reasonable number. I’m just ... (show quote)


Are you serious? The covid vaccine neither prevented anyone from getting covid, it did not prevent anyone from transmitting it either. The only thing it did is make the disease less serious for those at high risk.

In spite of that we forced our military, high school and college students, professional athletes and many other groups that were at no risk from the virus to take the vaccine regardless of the side effects. It should never have been allowed to be given to anyone other than those at high risk from the virus.

Reply
Jul 10, 2023 00:37:14   #
btbg
 
National Park wrote:
The threat of losing a job causes more people to get vaccinated, which reduces the spread of the disease, which protects you and me.


Getting vaccinated did not reduce the spread of the disease. It only reduced the severity of the disease in some individuals. That is not the same thing. People can and still do get the virus that have been vaccinated. And, those who have been vaccinated and get the virus can still spread the disease, so how does the vaccine reduce the spread?

Reply
Jul 10, 2023 00:38:23   #
btbg
 
AGO wrote:
My father, a very wise man, taught me that you should not argue with idiots because it will only frustrate you and an idiot will never listen to either facts or logic. For that reason, I am done with this strand. Those on this site who do not trust the science are proving the wisdom of my father's words. Those who are looking for excuses to not get vaccinated or wear masks have not presented any verified facts, just misinformation. And, worse yet, they accuse those of us who understand science, of being sheep who blindly make decisions based on facts. Their lack of logic and understanding of the harm they cause others is amazing. Sadly, it is impossible to educate them because they refuse to think.

So, I will no longer argue with the idiots who either don't or won't understand why it is important for all to get vaccinated and wear masks. It's been fun, but it's time to talk about cameras and photography.
My father, a very wise man, taught me that you sho... (show quote)


The Cochran report shows conclusively that masks did not work. Try reading the report.

Reply
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Jul 10, 2023 08:59:28   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
btbg wrote:
The Cochran report shows conclusively that masks did not work. Try reading the report.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2023/03/11/cochrane-says-review-does-not-show-that-face-masks-dont-work-against-covid-19/?sh=1e6dbb771937

That is just one link that shows your beloved Cochrane Review has been misinterpreted. Choose what you want to believe, and I will choose my beliefs.

I see a difference in claiming “masks don’t work” vs “masks didn’t work.” I have seen how people wore masks, and it is no surprise that they were not as effective as they could have been.

Reply
Jul 10, 2023 13:24:21   #
btbg
 
JohnFrim wrote:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2023/03/11/cochrane-says-review-does-not-show-that-face-masks-dont-work-against-covid-19/?sh=1e6dbb771937

That is just one link that shows your beloved Cochrane Review has been misinterpreted. Choose what you want to believe, and I will choose my beliefs.

I see a difference in claiming “masks don’t work” vs “masks didn’t work.” I have seen how people wore masks, and it is no surprise that they were not as effective as they could have been.


Use whatever semantics you wish. They didn't work so mask mandates were not only worthless they were tyranical.

Reply
Jul 10, 2023 14:21:20   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
btbg wrote:
Use whatever semantics you wish. They didn't work so mask mandates were not only worthless they were tyranical.


Operationally, masking might have been less effective than it could have been. And the toll on the economy and the human psyche may have been massively excessive. But NOT because masks do not work.

I am reminded of the joke about the guy with a large family. The doctor told him to put a rubber on his organ during sex. A few months later the wife is pregnant again, and the doctor asks why the man didn’t follow the advice. The man said he tried, but didn’t have rubbers or an organ, so he put a pair of boots on the piano.

And your comment does not address your misinterpretation of the Cochrane Report.

Reply
Jul 10, 2023 14:50:53   #
btbg
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Operationally, masking might have been less effective than it could have been. And the toll on the economy and the human psyche may have been massively excessive. But NOT because masks do not work.

I am reminded of the joke about the guy with a large family. The doctor told him to put a rubber on his organ during sex. A few months later the wife is pregnant again, and the doctor asks why the man didn’t follow the advice. The man said he tried, but didn’t have rubbers or an organ, so he put a pair of boots on the piano.

And your comment does not address your misinterpretation of the Cochrane Report.
Operationally, masking might have been less effect... (show quote)


Ok, lets address the Cochran Report and the "misinterpretation." From your article.

“It would be accurate to say that the review examined whether interventions to promote mask wearing help to slow the spread of respiratory viruses, and that the results were inconclusive. Given the limitations in the primary evidence, the review is not able to address the question of whether mask-wearing itself reduces people's risk of contracting or spreading respiratory viruses.”

The results were not inconclusive. They showed a very slight difference between masks and no masks, in favor of the non-masked. The difference is too small to be statistically valid. Inconclusive in this context means that there was no detectable benefit of mask wearing.

Even if only 10 percent of the population that wore masks wore them correctly there should have been a clear statistical benefit to wearing them. The fact that there was not shows that they did not work. As to the "difference" between the flu and covid and the claim that because the two are not the same the Cochrane Report mixed apples and oranges, that is just plain bull from scientists attempting to cover their butts for their incorrect recommendations on masking.

Covid is more contagious than the flu, yet the evidence is clear that masks do not work on the flu. The less contagious the virus the more benefit the masks should show. The claim that flu is not in aerosols but covid is means nothing as aerosols will pass right through a mask because of their small size.

Believe whatever you want, but masks mandates did not work because masks are ineffective. The covid vaccine did not slow the spread of the disease because it still allowed transmission. So, everything they told us was a lie.

Reply
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Jul 10, 2023 19:29:56   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
btbg wrote:
Ok, lets address the Cochran Report and the "misinterpretation." From your article.

“It would be accurate to say that the review examined whether interventions to promote mask wearing help to slow the spread of respiratory viruses, and that the results were inconclusive. Given the limitations in the primary evidence, the review is not able to address the question of whether mask-wearing itself reduces people's risk of contracting or spreading respiratory viruses.”

The results were not inconclusive. They showed a very slight difference between masks and no masks, in favor of the non-masked. The difference is too small to be statistically valid. Inconclusive in this context means that there was no detectable benefit of mask wearing.

Even if only 10 percent of the population that wore masks wore them correctly there should have been a clear statistical benefit to wearing them. The fact that there was not shows that they did not work. As to the "difference" between the flu and covid and the claim that because the two are not the same the Cochrane Report mixed apples and oranges, that is just plain bull from scientists attempting to cover their butts for their incorrect recommendations on masking.

Covid is more contagious than the flu, yet the evidence is clear that masks do not work on the flu. The less contagious the virus the more benefit the masks should show. The claim that flu is not in aerosols but covid is means nothing as aerosols will pass right through a mask because of their small size.

Believe whatever you want, but masks mandates did not work because masks are ineffective. The covid vaccine did not slow the spread of the disease because it still allowed transmission. So, everything they told us was a lie.
Ok, lets address the Cochran Report and the "... (show quote)


Doesn’t “inconclusive” mean you cannot say “they did not work?”

Reply
Jul 10, 2023 21:30:19   #
btbg
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Doesn’t “inconclusive” mean you cannot say “they did not work?”


No. In scientific terms iteans there is no statistical difference between the two groups.

No statistical difference .Evans the masks did no harm, at least when it comes to the virus, which surprised me.

Had the minute difference between the masked and non masked group been skewed in favor of masks instead of the other way that would indicate that further study was needed to see if different types of masks got better results and to see if behavior might be altered to improve mask function.

However the data actually skewed slightly the other way meaning that the next study should be regarding the behavior of the masked vs the unmasked to see if that made a difference.

What is really interesting about the whole thing is that states with no or limited mask requirements fared virtually identical to other states with the exception of Alaska and Hawaii who both isolated themselves from visitors. The same with percentage of vaccinated individuals. That also seemed to make no difference in the number of people who got sick. In fact by 2023 more vaccinated than unvaccinated were getting seriously ill suggesting that the vaccine does not last very long and that natural immunity does work.

That means the best defense from the virus is extreme social distancing rather than any requirements government made.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.