Walking around lens
Jun 13, 2023 19:13:34 #
Vault wrote:
The Nikon 18-200 DX VR-II is an outstanding do everything lens. Wide enough and fast enough at all lengths.
Stays on my D7200 90% of the time.Don
Jun 13, 2023 20:04:33 #
Hello, while I can't answer your question about which would be the sharpest lens I will say that I prefer the F 2.8 because of the extra stops it gives. If I really want to separate the for ground from the back ground then the 2.8 is far better. I guess it comes down to your shooting preference.
Good Luck, David
Good Luck, David
Jun 13, 2023 20:19:34 #
rehess wrote:
I had a 18-270mm lens back when I used Canon, but I had gone back to my combination of 18-55mm and 70-300mm before I went back to Pentax. Designers have to deal with compromises that often are noticeable without ‘peeping’, and usually I knew which focal length range I needed before I had mounted the lens.
I am currently using a Tamron 18-270 3.5-6.3 VC on my D80 and a Nikon 24-120 3.5-5.6 on my D90. Very pleased with the images.
Jun 13, 2023 21:32:36 #
imagemeister wrote:
Just to reiterate, the OP wants SHARP images - not likely with all these high ratio and kit zooms being recommended !
Exactly. That is why I recommend the 16-85 VR glass, and not one of the myriad of “superzooms” that others are speaking of. I know from experience that the 16-85 will deliver the goods. 👍
https://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/nikon/16-85mm-f3.5-5.6g-ed-vr-dx-af-s-nikkor/review/
https://www.opticallimits.com/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/635-nikkor16853556vr
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/nikon-16-85mm-f-3-5-5-6g-ed-vr-af-s-dx-review-17451
https://www.cameralabs.com/nikkor_dx_16-85mm_vr/
👍😃
Jun 13, 2023 21:35:41 #
larryepage wrote:
I have been using the 24-120mm f/4 Nikkor as my 'd... (show quote)
Color saturation, can be adjusted to suit, in White balance target. I have 24-120 f4 both in Z & "gold ring" . They are my go to for walking around & general work. If i have to reach out, the 70-200, or 200-500 take care of that . I find the greater the multiplication of lens, the less quality of imagery.
Jun 13, 2023 22:15:12 #
Jun 13, 2023 22:35:54 #
I have the 24-120mm Nikon lens and it a very sharp lens. I have compared it to my 24-70mm and my 70-200mm and there is very little difference in the sharpness. Great lens, look for it used on sites like B&H, it usually sells for around $700 vs the $1100 new.
Jun 14, 2023 00:21:50 #
bobburk3 wrote:
I'm looking for a good lens to use on my Nikon D72... (show quote)
I've used my original Nikon 24-120 'street sweeper' on the 7200, and still do on my D4. Even without the newer model VR features, it's a fine lens. I still use the older 70-200 f2.8 model, the weight difference is noticeable, it extends further, and I'd hate to replace it if it was damaged, it's hard to find unless you buy new. I like the lightweight 18-200mm, but mainly use the newer model Tamron 28-300 VC/Di. The Nikon70-300 P model lens is very light, quick and silent. The older film-era Tamron 28-300mm is amazingly sharp and focuses fast, if you're lucky enough to find one in good condition. Mine was bumped by a passerby on the street in 2015 but I finally found a replacement in extremely good condition on ebay from a seller in Japan, and though the older model wasn't made for digital era bodies, my DSLRs never got the memo, and they still get along fine with in AF or manual mode.
The newer Tamron 28-300mm VC/Di is as light as the Nikon 18-200mm VR, practically feather weight, they used to sell between $50 to $100 in good condition. I found my VC/Di model at Roberts in 2018 in nearly-new condition and seldom take it off the 7200, and hardly ever use the 18-200 (or the 24-120mm). I've been fortunately enough to own many good Tamron and Nikon model lenses since I started traveling in the 70's. I never turned down a chance to try a different model lens, and ignored folks who informed me it wasn't wise to use a film lens on a modern digital camera. From the olden 'wooden shutter' days, I've never been hesitant about swapping between film DX or FX lenses between the bodies, depending on the situation, though you do have to know when a very old lens is capable of damaging a new body. Older lens are can be very good buy as long as they've been treated well. For many years now, I buy used gear from Roberts. Both of my Tammy 28-300mm models (and their 150-600mm cousins) are among my favorites on the 7200, and I still employ one of my old 200-400mm Tamrons; it's a bit long but heavy for the 7200, but not as much as the 15-600, and like the others it's extremely sharp and fast.
The last time I found any of these for sale used, it was only $85. If you don't need that reach and don't mind a used lens, an old model street sweeper is a great walking around lens in the city. Hope this helps and happy shooting.
Jun 14, 2023 01:32:09 #
imagemeister wrote:
Just to reiterate, the OP wants SHARP images - not likely with all these high ratio and kit zooms being recommended !
Indeed. Superzoom = compromise (and it's not just the sharpness that's compromised. Fringing, contrast, vignetting, distortion).
Also worth reiterating is that 24-120mm on a DX camera will leave it lacking at the wide end (36mm equiv. - hardly what you'd call general purpose or walkaround).
Jun 14, 2023 06:03:54 #
bobburk3 wrote:
I'm looking for a good lens to use on my Nikon D72... (show quote)
There was a 24-120mm lens offered for sale yesterday or day before in the classified section for a very good price. Check it out.
Jun 14, 2023 07:10:29 #
bobburk3 wrote:
I'm looking for a good lens to use on my Nikon D72... (show quote)
I had a Nikon D 7100 with Nikon's 18-140 lens. It was sharp, very versatile and not heavy. I regret selling both.
Jun 14, 2023 08:16:24 #
R.G. wrote:
Indeed. Superzoom = compromise (and it's not just the sharpness that's compromised. Fringing, contrast, vignetting, distortion).
Also worth reiterating is that 24-120mm on a DX camera will leave it lacking at the wide end (36mm equiv. - hardly what you'd call general purpose or walkaround).
Also worth reiterating is that 24-120mm on a DX camera will leave it lacking at the wide end (36mm equiv. - hardly what you'd call general purpose or walkaround).
Jun 14, 2023 08:34:06 #
AndyT wrote:
I had a Nikon D 7100 with Nikon's 18-140 lens. It was sharp, very versatile and not heavy. I regret selling both.
I love my D7200, which is very similar to your D7100. Thanks for your comments. I will take a look at the 18-140.
Jun 14, 2023 09:03:01 #
R.G. wrote:
Indeed. Superzoom = compromise (and it's not just the sharpness that's compromised. Fringing, contrast, vignetting, distortion).
Also worth reiterating is that 24-120mm on a DX camera will leave it lacking at the wide end (36mm equiv. - hardly what you'd call general purpose or walkaround).
Also worth reiterating is that 24-120mm on a DX camera will leave it lacking at the wide end (36mm equiv. - hardly what you'd call general purpose or walkaround).
Just trying to understand all this info about lenses. I have learned a ton through this discussion and am so happy to get replies from such knowledgeable photography people.
What do you mean by "lacking at the wide end"?
Jun 14, 2023 09:16:03 #
bobburk3 wrote:
Just trying to understand all this info about lenses. I have learned a ton through this discussion and am so happy to get replies from such knowledgeable photography people.
What do you mean by "lacking at the wide end"?
What do you mean by "lacking at the wide end"?
24mm is not really wide enough on DX - is = to 35mm on full frame.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.