gwilliams6 wrote:
IMHO, there are some nuggets of good info sometimes in their videos. But they are mostly good entertainment.
They are NOT really taken seriously by my fellow professional photographers that I know, but their 1.4 million subscribers love them, and keep them in the money with clicks, buying their books and videos, etc.
They are an attractive couple and that certainly helps them get watched. I respect the niche and living they have carved out for themselves, and I acknowledge all the hard work it took to get to their level of success, and what it takes to stay there.
They are big enough to feel they should take on any subject, some of which they should have stayed away from like the Steve McCurry bashing fiasco. Sometimes their research is incomplete and/or flawed when they test new gear and dont even know how to properly set up the gear beforehand, LOL
I dont hate them, I dont love them. They are the kings of the clickbait title, which does get those clicks and make them more money. I do check out what subjects they are talking about, and if it is a subject I care about, I might watch to see what they think they know, and check their facts with the reality I know. Yes sometimes I agree with them, their findings and their opinions, sometimes I dont.
I much prefer reviewers/photographers Dustin Abbott, Gerald Undone, Huge Brownstone of Three Men and an Elephant, Gordan Laing, Dan Watson, Jason Vong, Mark Smith, Mark Galer, etc.
Cheers and all the best to you all.
IMHO, there are some nuggets of good info sometime... (
show quote)
I second all these sentiments. Tony and Chelsea have helped a lot of beginners, but they have also unnecessarily stirred up a lot of muck they knew nothing about... Their "how to" videos are their best. Their camera reviews are mediocre. Their opinion pieces are often irrelevant click bait sensationalism.