cahale wrote:
A few shots of the Big Bend National Park. It is nowhere as green and flowery as some of the other parks but has it's own "charm" if you will. Examine numbers 4 and 5 and post your opinion of which is better. The "realistic" shot with the enhancements of man, or the highly edited shot which would have been equally as "realistic" 150 years ago. Are you in the "nothing except what comes untouched out of the camera" group, or like me adopt the idea that post processing tools are the greatest thing since the invention of women. (You thought I was going to say "sliced bread" didn't you)
A few shots of the Big Bend National Park. It is ... (
show quote)