ksmmike wrote:
I'm starting to like this lens more and more. Again, I don't think it's outstanding in any aspect, but it's good to very good in most so far. I don't think the micro contrast is as good as my voigtlander primes, but why should I expect it to be? I'm going to try and shoot some landscapes and compare it closer to the Nikon Z 24-200 at the 100 and 200mm end and also the 300 f4 that's the F mount lens at F8 and F10 and see if the Tamron holds it's own against those 2 lenses. I suspect it will against the 24-200, not as sure against the 300 prime but it should be close enough for me to want to part with those 2 lenses and keep the Tamron. I have the 24-120 S lens as well. So between the 20mm prime, the 24-120 and the 70-300, that should be all I need for landscapes in the future since I dont do astro and most of my images are at F8 and F10 for landscapes. Not all of course but the 20 is a f1.8 and the 24-120 is an F4, but you likely knew that already :0
Mike
I'm starting to like this lens more and more. Agai... (
show quote)
Posts do not come up after the one you replied to. Best to quote reply.