Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Artificial Intelligence Pictures
Apr 15, 2023 10:55:21 #
I don't know how hedgehoggers feel about AI pictures. I am including a couple here. They have a little bit more of an artistic feel to them rather than a really sharp photo. Hopefully some will like them. I have to give credit to "Photobacks" for their AI design engine. I think Adobe has a really good engine too, and Shutterstock, and several others.
Apr 15, 2023 10:58:03 #
gener202002 wrote:
I don't know how hedgehoggers feel about AI pictures. I am including a couple here. They have a little bit more of an artistic feel to them rather than a really sharp photo. Hopefully some will like them. I have to give credit to "Photobacks" for their AI design engine. I think Adobe has a really good engine too, and Shutterstock, and several others.
I like 2 especially.
Apr 15, 2023 10:59:08 #
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Apr 15, 2023 11:04:34 #
Apr 15, 2023 11:07:29 #
Toment wrote:
look overcooked to me...
I kind of think that may be a good point. I may try to underplay a little more in future ai photos.
Apr 15, 2023 11:15:32 #
Apr 15, 2023 11:21:36 #
Apr 15, 2023 11:24:38 #
Apr 15, 2023 11:29:29 #
Scary-nice. They do look a bit "artificial," but at a glance they're okay, especially #2.
See my separate post: Fractals.
See my separate post: Fractals.
Apr 15, 2023 11:40:51 #
kenArchi
Loc: Seal Beach, CA
I'm glad you tell us they are ai pictures.
Helps me appreciate more your artistic endeavors.
I like them both.
Helps me appreciate more your artistic endeavors.
I like them both.
Apr 15, 2023 11:42:01 #
Toment wrote:
look overcooked to me...
That’s the whole point for some images — to create altered states of reality.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Apr 15, 2023 13:11:37 #
Apr 15, 2023 17:41:03 #
Apr 15, 2023 18:24:34 #
kenArchi wrote:
I'm glad you tell us they are ai pictures.
Helps me appreciate more your artistic endeavors.
I like them both.
Helps me appreciate more your artistic endeavors.
I like them both.
Thanks, Ken
Yes, I feel I am obligated to mention they are artificial as I would have a problem taking credit for something that belongs elsewhere. And I think the source should be duly noted. As I understand it Photobacks is coming up with a new version of AI soon.
I am using it as now that I am getting older, it is getting harder to get out and take pictures of new things. A lot of the pictures I take around town are crowded with little empty space. I want to get out and take pictures of beaches, mountains, and landscapes, but cannot do it. This is the next best thing for me.
I put into the engine the type of picture I would like. It creates images. Then I modify them colorwise and other ways, so the image is only partly mine. Often, what I have in mind when I put the information in, is not what I get out of it, but things do come up often that are workable even if not what I had in mind. I just do some modifications.
Apr 15, 2023 19:32:17 #
NMGal wrote:
I really like number 2. Number 1 to me is unreal looking (?).
Thanks, NMGal
I've created a softer version of #1, maybe I will put it out later. Basically, I desaturated and I think it does look better. I question myself, what is real photography? Is it a picture of exactly what is there? Or is it an art? Often I create various versions and can't decide which way is best.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.