fourlocks wrote:
But what if he photographed both the sky and his subject, separately. The combined end result is "his" photograph, isn't it? Back in the old 35mm days, we would experiment with double exposures which was essentially using the camera to combine two shots. What's the difference? Basically, I agree with you; I'm just playin' the devil's advocate here.
Understood.
Even if he took one photo of the sky and another of the subject, it would not be
photograph that a he took.